Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Feb 7;100(3):e14. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00497.
The physical and psychological impact of brachial plexus injury (BPI) has not been comprehensively measured with BPI-specific scales. Our objective was to develop and test a patient-derived questionnaire to measure the impact and outcomes of BPI.
We developed a questionnaire in 3 phases with preoperative and postoperative patients. Phase 1 included interviews of patients using open-ended questions addressing the impact of BPI and improvement expected (preoperative patients) or received (postoperative patients). Phase 2 involved assembling a draft questionnaire and administering the questionnaire twice to establish test-retest reliability. Phase 3 involved selecting final items, developing a scoring system, and assessing validity. Patient scores using the questionnaire were assessed in comparison with scores of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and RAND-36 measures.
Patients with partial or complete plexopathy participated. In Phase 1 (23 patients), discrete categories were discerned from open-ended responses and became items for the preoperative and postoperative versions of the questionnaire. In Phase 2 (50 patients [14 from Phase 1]), test-retest reliability was established, with weighted kappa values of ≥0.50 for all items. In Phase 3, 43 items were retained and grouped into 4 subscales: symptoms, limitations, emotion, and improvement expected (preoperative) or improvement received (postoperative). A score for each subscale, ranging from 0 to 100, can be calculated, with higher scores indicating more symptoms, limitations, and emotional distress, and greater improvement expected (or received). Preoperative scores were worse than postoperative scores for the symptoms, limitations, and emotion subscales (composite score of 48 compared with 38; p = 0.05), and more improvement was expected than was received (69 compared with 53; p = 0.01). Correlations with the DASH (0.44 to 0.74) and RAND-36 (0.23 to 0.80) for related scales were consistent and moderate, indicating that the new questionnaire is valid and distinct.
We developed a patient-derived questionnaire that measures the physical and psychological impact of BPI on preoperative and postoperative patients and the amount of improvement expected or received from surgery. This BPI-specific questionnaire enhances the comprehensive assessment of this population.
臂丛神经损伤(BPI)的身心影响尚未通过 BPI 专用量表进行全面测量。我们的目的是开发和测试一种源自患者的问卷,以测量 BPI 的影响和结果。
我们分三个阶段,在术前和术后患者中进行了研究。第 1 阶段包括对患者进行访谈,使用开放式问题来解决 BPI 的影响以及预期(术前患者)或接受(术后患者)的改善。第 2 阶段涉及制定调查问卷草案并进行两次问卷调查,以建立测试-重测可靠性。第 3 阶段涉及选择最终项目,制定评分系统,并评估有效性。使用问卷评估患者的分数,并与手臂,肩部和手残疾(DASH)和 RAND-36 测量结果进行比较。
部分或完全神经丛病变患者参与了研究。在第 1 阶段(23 名患者),从开放式回答中发现了离散类别,并成为术前和术后问卷的项目。在第 2 阶段(50 名患者[来自第 1 阶段的 14 名]),建立了测试-重测可靠性,所有项目的加权kappa 值均≥0.50。在第 3 阶段,保留了 43 个项目,并将其分为 4 个分量表:症状,限制,情绪和预期改善(术前)或改善(术后)。每个分量表的分数范围为 0 到 100,可以计算出分数,分数越高表示症状,限制和情绪困扰越多,预期改善(或获得)越多。与术后相比,术前症状,限制和情绪分量表的评分更差(综合评分为 48 比 38;p=0.05),并且预期的改善比实际获得的改善更多(69 比 53;p=0.01)。与相关量表的 DASH(0.44 到 0.74)和 RAND-36(0.23 到 0.80)的相关性一致且适中,表明新问卷是有效且独特的。
我们开发了一种源自患者的问卷,可测量术前和术后患者的 BPI 对身体和心理的影响,以及手术预期或获得的改善程度。这种针对 BPI 的问卷增强了对此类人群的全面评估。