Department of Psychology, University of Trier.
Faculty for Human Sciences, University of Potsdam.
Dev Psychol. 2021 Mar;57(3):325-346. doi: 10.1037/dev0001147. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
Differentiation hypotheses concern changes in the structural organization of cognitive abilities that depend on the level of general intelligence (ability differentiation) or age (developmental differentiation). Part 1 of this article presents a review of the literature on ability and developmental differentiation effects in children, revealing the need for studies that examine both effects simultaneously in this age group with appropriate statistical methods. Part 2 presents an empirical study in which nonlinear factor analytic models were applied to the standardization sample ( = 2,619 German elementary schoolchildren; 48% female; age: = 8.8 years, = 1.2, range 6-12 years) of the THINK 1-4 intelligence test to investigate ability differentiation, developmental differentiation, and their interaction. The sample was nationally representative regarding age, gender, urbanization, and geographic location of residence but not regarding parents' education and migration background (overrepresentation of children with more educated parents, underrepresentation of children with migration background). The results showed no consistent evidence for the presence of differentiation effects or their interaction. Instead, different patterns were observed for figural, numerical, and verbal reasoning. Implications for the construction of intelligence tests, the assessment of intelligence in children, and for theories of cognitive development are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
分化假说涉及认知能力的结构组织变化,这些变化取决于一般智力(能力分化)或年龄(发展分化)的水平。本文的第 1 部分回顾了关于儿童能力和发展分化效应的文献,揭示了需要在这个年龄组中同时使用适当的统计方法研究这两种效应。第 2 部分介绍了一项实证研究,该研究将非线性因素分析模型应用于 THINK 1-4 智力测验的标准化样本(= 2619 名德国小学生;48%为女性;年龄:= 8.8 岁,= 1.2,范围为 6-12 岁),以调查能力分化、发展分化及其相互作用。该样本在年龄、性别、城市化和居住地理位置方面具有全国代表性,但在父母教育和移民背景方面不具有代表性(具有较高教育背景的父母的孩子比例过高,具有移民背景的孩子比例过低)。结果没有一致的证据表明存在分化效应或其相互作用。相反,对于图形推理、数字推理和言语推理观察到了不同的模式。讨论了这些结果对智力测验编制、儿童智力评估以及认知发展理论的意义。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。