Wissenschaftsbereich Psychologie, Freie Universität Berlin.
Hist Psychol. 2021 Aug;24(3):193-214. doi: 10.1037/hop0000183. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
In 2 articles, this journal has presented critical psychology (CP), which emerged in Germany during the 1980s, as an exemplary paradigm that committed itself to both scientific and political objectives and became a victim of Cold-War confrontations. The presentation was mainly based on narratives and writings circulating within CP itself. I have reexamined the case using archival materials and supplementary literary sources. This allows for a more complete and balanced account of postwar psychology and the contemporary political situation in general. In particular, I argue against Teo's hypothesis that CP was an indigenous paradigm that had to assert itself against American psychology. Marxism, constructivism, and subject orientation are analyzed as principal components of CP, and a claim for sole representation is identified as a predominant reason for the isolation of CP within German psychology. Finally, I briefly report on CP following the collapse of Soviet communism and comment on the present historicization of CP. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
在这两篇文章中，本刊将批判性心理学（CP）作为典范范例进行了介绍，CP 于 20 世纪 80 年代在德国兴起，致力于实现科学和政治目标，并成为冷战对抗的受害者。该介绍主要基于 CP 内部的叙述和著作。我使用档案材料和补充文献资源重新审查了这个案例。这使得对后战争心理学和一般当代政治形势有了更完整和平衡的描述。特别是，我反对 Teo 的假设，即 CP 是一种必须反对美国心理学的本土范式。马克思主义、建构主义和主体取向被分析为 CP 的主要组成部分，而对独家代表权的主张被确定为 CP 在德国心理学中孤立的主要原因。最后，我简要报告了苏联共产主义崩溃后 CP 的情况，并对 CP 的当前历史化进行了评论。（《心理学文献摘要数据库》记录（c）2021 APA，保留所有权利）。
