• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

飞秒激光辅助与超声乳化白内障手术的比较:着眼于内皮细胞分析。

Comparison of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted and Ultrasound-Assisted Cataract Surgery with Focus on Endothelial Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Basel University Hospital, Mittlerestr str. 91, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.

Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2021 Feb 2;21(3):996. doi: 10.3390/s21030996.

DOI:10.3390/s21030996
PMID:33540680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7867300/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery has the potential to make critical steps of cataract surgery easier and safer, and reduce endothelial cell loss, thus, improving postoperative outcomes. This study compared FLACS with the conventional method in terms of endothelial cells behavior, clinical outcomes, and capsulotomy precision.

METHODS

In a single-center, randomized controlled study, 130 patients with cataracta senilis received FLACS or conventional cataract surgery.

RESULTS

A significant endothelial cell loss was observed postoperatively, compared to the preoperative values in both groups. The endothelial cell counts was significantly better in the FLACS group in cataract grade 2 ( = 0.048) patients, compared to conventionally at 4 weeks. The effective phaco time was notably shorter in grade 2 of the FLACS group ( = 0.007) compared to the conventional. However, no statistically significant differences were found for the whole sample, including all cataract grades, due to the overall cataract density in the FLACS group being significantly higher (2.60 ± 0.58, < 0.001) as compared to conventional methods (2.23 ± 0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Low energy FLACS provides a better result compared to endothelial cell loss, size, and shape variations, as well as in effective phaco time within certain cataract grade subgroups. A complete comparison between two groups was not possible because of the higher cataract grade in the FLACS. FLACS displayed a positive effect on endothelial cell preservation and was proven to be much more precise.

摘要

未加标签

飞秒激光辅助白内障手术有可能使白内障手术的关键步骤更容易和更安全,并减少内皮细胞损失,从而改善术后结果。本研究比较了飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS)与传统方法在角膜内皮细胞行为、临床结果和囊袋切开精度方面的差异。

方法

在一项单中心、随机对照研究中,130 名老年性白内障患者接受了 FLACS 或传统白内障手术。

结果

与两组术前值相比,术后均观察到明显的内皮细胞丢失。与传统组相比,FLACS 组白内障 2 级( = 0.048)患者术后内皮细胞计数明显更好,4 周时差异有统计学意义。FLACS 组 2 级的有效超声乳化时间明显短于传统组( = 0.007)。然而,由于 FLACS 组的整体白内障密度明显高于传统组(2.60 ± 0.58, < 0.001),包括所有白内障分级在内的全样本并没有表现出统计学上的显著差异。

结论

低能量的飞秒激光辅助白内障手术在某些白内障分级亚组中,在角膜内皮细胞丢失、大小和形状变化以及有效超声乳化时间方面提供了更好的结果。由于 FLACS 组的白内障分级较高,无法对两组进行完全比较。FLACS 对内皮细胞的保护有积极的影响,并且被证明更加精确。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5790/7867300/1df92a0a9e2d/sensors-21-00996-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5790/7867300/ac59e9862fbc/sensors-21-00996-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5790/7867300/e83a2112e37c/sensors-21-00996-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5790/7867300/735d4c6436f4/sensors-21-00996-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5790/7867300/7fc4c63b88bb/sensors-21-00996-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5790/7867300/8c2cedbf0d5e/sensors-21-00996-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5790/7867300/1df92a0a9e2d/sensors-21-00996-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5790/7867300/ac59e9862fbc/sensors-21-00996-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5790/7867300/e83a2112e37c/sensors-21-00996-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5790/7867300/735d4c6436f4/sensors-21-00996-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5790/7867300/7fc4c63b88bb/sensors-21-00996-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5790/7867300/8c2cedbf0d5e/sensors-21-00996-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5790/7867300/1df92a0a9e2d/sensors-21-00996-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted and Ultrasound-Assisted Cataract Surgery with Focus on Endothelial Analysis.飞秒激光辅助与超声乳化白内障手术的比较:着眼于内皮细胞分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Feb 2;21(3):996. doi: 10.3390/s21030996.
2
Endothelial cell loss and refractive predictability in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with conventional cataract surgery.与传统白内障手术相比,飞秒激光辅助白内障手术中的内皮细胞丢失和屈光可预测性。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;92(7):617-22. doi: 10.1111/aos.12406. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
3
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus 2.2 mm clear corneal phacoemulsification.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与2.2毫米透明角膜超声乳化术
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;65(10):942-948. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_152_17.
4
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery--current status and future directions.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术——现状与未来方向。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar-Apr;61(2):103-31. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
5
Effect of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery (FLACS) on Endothelial Cell Count.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS)对内皮细胞计数的影响。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2017 Dec;27(12):763-766.
6
Comparison of ultrasound energy consumption between low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery in patients with different cataract densities.不同白内障密度患者中低能量飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障手术的超声能量消耗比较
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2023 May;33(3):1373-1379. doi: 10.1177/11206721221147952. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery Compared with Manual Cataract Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of 14 567 Eyes.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与手动白内障手术的疗效和安全性比较:14567 只眼的荟萃分析。
Ophthalmology. 2016 Oct;123(10):2113-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
8
Intraoperative outcomes and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: Canadian perspective.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的术中结果和安全性:加拿大视角。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;54(1):130-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2018.02.022. Epub 2018 May 1.
9
[Preliminary evaluation of the femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in 300 cases].[300例飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的初步评估]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Sep;51(9):689-93.
10
Determinants of Visual Outcomes in Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery and Phacoemulsification: A Nested Case Control Study.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术和超声乳化白内障吸除术中视觉效果的决定因素:一项巢式病例对照研究。
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul-Sep;22(3):356-61. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.159762.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Clear Corneal Incisions via Femtosecond Laser Versus Manual Incisions on Corneal Aberrations in Cataract Surgery.飞秒激光与手动切口的透明角膜切口对白内障手术中角膜像差的影响
Micromachines (Basel). 2025 Aug 15;16(8):939. doi: 10.3390/mi16080939.
2
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障手术:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27569. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13174-1.
3
Comparison of corneal endothelial cell loss in FLACS: impact on endothelial cells in different regions.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-Term Evaluation of Capsulotomy Shape and Posterior Capsule Opacification after Low-Energy Bimanual Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery.低能量双手飞秒激光辅助白内障手术后囊切开术形状及后囊膜混浊的长期评估
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 23;2020:6431314. doi: 10.1155/2020/6431314. eCollection 2020.
2
Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional cataract surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与常规白内障手术的比较:荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Aug;46(8):1075-1085. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000228.
3
Anterior segment optical coherence tomography and its clinical applications.
FLACS 中角膜内皮细胞丢失的比较:不同区域对内皮细胞的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Sep 1;50(9):912-918. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001474.
4
Cataract: Advances in surgery and whether surgery remains the only treatment in future.白内障:手术进展以及手术在未来是否仍为唯一治疗方法。
Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2021 Oct 21;1(1):100008. doi: 10.1016/j.aopr.2021.100008. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard ultrasound phacoemulsification cataract surgery.激光辅助白内障手术与标准超声乳化白内障手术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 23;6(6):CD010735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010735.pub3.
6
Conventional Phacoemulsification Surgery Versus Femtosecond Laser Phacoemulsification Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of Cumulative Dissipated Energy and Corneal Endothelial Loss in Cataract Patients.传统超声乳化手术与飞秒激光超声乳化手术:白内障患者累积消散能量与角膜内皮损失的比较分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun 19;17:1709-1716. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S408717. eCollection 2023.
7
Comparison of Conventional and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery Regarding Macula Behavior and Thickness.常规和飞秒激光辅助白内障手术对黄斑行为和厚度的比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 23;59(4):639. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040639.
8
Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification on corneal impact: A meta-analysis and systematic review.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术对角膜影响的比较:Meta 分析和系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 14;18(4):e0284181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284181. eCollection 2023.
9
Comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.单手旋转超声乳化术与传统超声乳化术及飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的围手术期参数比较
Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec 18;14(12):1868-1875. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.12.09. eCollection 2021.
10
Why Use Ultrashort Pulses in Ophthalmology and Which Factors Affect Cut Quality.为什么在眼科中使用超短脉冲,以及哪些因素会影响切割质量。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jul 8;57(7):700. doi: 10.3390/medicina57070700.
眼前节光学相干断层扫描及其临床应用。
Clin Exp Optom. 2019 May;102(3):195-207. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12869. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
4
Endothelial parameters in central and peripheral cornea in patients wearing contact lenses.佩戴隐形眼镜患者中央和周边角膜的内皮参数
Int J Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov 18;11(11):1768-1773. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.11.06. eCollection 2018.
5
Comparison of phacoemulsification parameters between manual and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.手动与飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的超声乳化参数比较。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct;53(5):542-547. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
6
Differences in energy and corneal endothelium between femtosecond laser-assisted and conventional cataract surgeries: prospective, intraindividual, randomized controlled trial.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统白内障手术在能量和角膜内皮方面的差异:前瞻性、个体内、随机对照试验。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug 18;11(8):1308-1316. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.08.10. eCollection 2018.
7
Anatomy of cornea and ocular surface.角膜和眼表面解剖。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;66(2):190-194. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_646_17.
8
Femtosecond Lasers and Corneal Surgical Procedures.飞秒激光与角膜外科手术
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2017 Sep-Oct;6(5):456-464. doi: 10.22608/APO.2017163. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
9
Cataract Surgery Performed by High Frequency LDV Z8 Femtosecond Laser: Safety, Efficacy, and Its Physical Properties.高频LDV Z8飞秒激光进行的白内障手术:安全性、有效性及其物理特性
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jun 18;17(6):1429. doi: 10.3390/s17061429.
10
Clinical outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery for hard nuclear cataracts.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术治疗硬核白内障的临床疗效比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Apr;43(4):486-491. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.01.010.