Department of Cardiac Surgery (M.P.T., H.H., D.S.L., R.L.P.), Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor MI.
Michigan Value Collaborative, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (M.P.T., J.M.Y., J.D.S.).
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Feb;14(2):e007144. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007144. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with improved outcomes for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, CR enrollment remains low and there is a dearth of real-world data on hospital-level variation in CR enrollment. We sought to explore determinants of hospital variability in CR enrollment during CAD episodes of care: medical management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI-MM), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
A cohort of 71 703 CAD episodes of care were identified from 33 hospitals in the Michigan Value Collaborative statewide multipayer registry (2015 to 2018). CR enrollment was defined using professional and facility claims and compared across treatment strategies: AMI-MM (n=18 678), PCI (n=41 986), and CABG (n=11 039). Hierarchical logistic regression was used to estimate effects of predictors and hospital risk-adjusted rates of CR enrollment.
Overall, 20 613 (28.8%) patients enrolled in CR, with significant differences by treatment strategy: AMI-MM=13.4%, PCI=29.0%, CABG=53.8% (<0.001). There were significant differences in CR enrollment across age groups, comorbidity status, and payer status. At the hospital-level, there was over 5-fold variation in hospital risk-adjusted CR enrollment rates (9.8%-51.6%). Hospital-level CR enrollment rates were highly correlated across treatment strategy, with the strongest correlation between AMI-MM versus PCI (R=0.72), followed by PCI versus CABG (R=0.51) and AMI-MM versus CABG (R=0.46, all <0.001).
Substantial variation exists in CR enrollment during CAD episodes of care across hospitals. However, within-hospital CR enrollment rates were significantly correlated across all treatment strategies. These findings suggest that CR enrollment during CAD episodes of care is the product of hospital-specific rather than treatment-specific practice patterns.
心脏康复(CR)可改善冠心病(CAD)患者的预后。然而,CR 的参与率仍然较低,并且缺乏关于医院层面在 CR 参与率方面差异的真实世界数据。我们试图探讨在 CAD 护理期间,与医疗管理急性心肌梗死(AMI-MM)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)相关的医院间 CR 参与率差异的决定因素。
从密歇根州价值合作组织全州多支付方注册中心的 33 家医院中确定了 71703 例 CAD 护理病例。CR 参与情况通过专业和医疗机构的索赔来定义,并在不同的治疗策略之间进行比较:AMI-MM(n=18678)、PCI(n=41986)和 CABG(n=11039)。使用分层逻辑回归来估计预测因子和医院风险调整的 CR 参与率的影响。
总体而言,20613 名(28.8%)患者参加了 CR,不同治疗策略之间存在显著差异:AMI-MM=13.4%,PCI=29.0%,CABG=53.8%(<0.001)。在年龄组、合并症状况和支付者状况方面,CR 参与情况存在显著差异。在医院层面,医院风险调整的 CR 参与率差异超过 5 倍(9.8%-51.6%)。在治疗策略方面,医院间 CR 参与率高度相关,其中 AMI-MM 与 PCI 之间的相关性最强(R=0.72),其次是 PCI 与 CABG(R=0.51)和 AMI-MM 与 CABG(R=0.46,均<0.001)。
在 CAD 护理期间,各医院之间的 CR 参与情况存在较大差异。然而,同一医院内的 CR 参与率在所有治疗策略中均显著相关。这些发现表明,CAD 护理期间的 CR 参与率是医院特定而非治疗特定实践模式的产物。