Larkins Lindsay W, Baker Russell T, Baker Jayme G
Department of Movement Sciences, Athletic Training Programs, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID.
University of Washington School of Medicine, WWAMI Medical Education Program, Moscow, ID.
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2020 Jul 8;2(3):100072. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100072. eCollection 2020 Sep.
To review the literature, identify and describe commonly used special tests for diagnosing injury to the ligaments of the ankle complex, present the distinguishing characteristics and limitations of each test, and discuss the current evidence for the clinical use of each test.
Multiple PubMed (1920-2018) and CINAHL (1920-2018) searches were conducted and various musculoskeletal examination textbooks were reviewed to examine common orthopedic tests used to assess the ankle. The articles were reviewed for additional references and the search continued until the original description was found when possible.
All articles discussing the performance of the test or its validity (ie, sensitivity and specificity) were reviewed and summarized.
Articles were reviewed for additional references and the search continued until the original description was found when possible.
The literature was reviewed, commonly used special tests for diagnosing ankle injuries were identified and described, distinguishing characteristics and limitations of each test were presented, and the current evidence for the clinical use of each test was discussed.
A complete physical examination is critical in the diagnosis of ankle injuries. The combination of available information such as mechanism of injury, all signs and symptoms, and changes in gait, is key to a conclusive and correct diagnosis. Clinicians should be aware of the severely limited evidence supporting the use of many commonly used special tests. Applying evidence from the literature will improve diagnostic accuracy. Further research is needed to understand the performance ability of special tests, both individually and when grouped as part of a test battery.
回顾文献,识别并描述用于诊断踝关节复合体韧带损伤的常用特殊检查,阐述每项检查的鉴别特征和局限性,并讨论每项检查临床应用的现有证据。
在PubMed(1920 - 2018年)和CINAHL(1920 - 2018年)进行了多次检索,并查阅了各种肌肉骨骼检查教科书,以研究用于评估踝关节的常见骨科检查。对文章进行回顾以获取更多参考文献,尽可能持续检索直至找到原始描述。
对所有讨论检查的执行情况或其有效性(即敏感性和特异性)的文章进行回顾和总结。
对文章进行回顾以获取更多参考文献,尽可能持续检索直至找到原始描述。
回顾文献,识别并描述用于诊断踝关节损伤的常用特殊检查,阐述每项检查的鉴别特征和局限性,并讨论每项检查临床应用的现有证据。
全面的体格检查对踝关节损伤的诊断至关重要。损伤机制、所有体征和症状以及步态变化等可用信息的综合是做出确定性正确诊断的关键。临床医生应意识到支持许多常用特殊检查使用的证据非常有限。应用文献中的证据将提高诊断准确性。需要进一步研究以了解特殊检查单独使用以及作为一组检查的一部分时的性能能力。