Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic, Desk S40, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Spine J. 2021 Jun;21(6):972-979. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.020. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
Preoperative TNF-AI use has been associated with increased rate of postoperative infections and complications in a variety of orthopedic procedures. However, the association between TNF-AI use and complications following spine surgery has not yet been studied.
The purpose of the present study was to assess the risk of reoperation in patients prescribed TNF-AI undergoing spinal fusion surgery.
This is a retrospective review.
A total of 427 patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery at a large healthcare system from 1/1/2009 to 12/31/2018.
Reoperation within 1 year.
We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery at a large healthcare system from 1/1/2009 to 12/31/2018. There were three distinct cohorts of spine surgery patients under study: patients with TNF-AI use in 90 days before surgery, patients with non-TNF-AI DMARD medications use in the 90 days before surgery, and patients taking neither TNF-AI nor other DMARD medications in 90 days before surgery. The primary outcome of interest was reoperation for any reason within 1 year following surgery.
Our study included 90 TNF-AI, 90 DMARD, and 123 control patients. Reoperation up to 1-year postsurgery occurred in 19% (n=17) of the TNF-AI group, 11% (n=10) of the DMARD group, and 6% (n=7) of the control group. The reasons for reoperation for TNF-AI group were 47% (n=8) infection and 53% (n=9) other causes which included failure to fuse and adjacent segment disease. Reasons for reoperation at 1 year were 40% (n=4) infection and 60% (n=6) other causes for DMARD patients and 14% (n=1) infection with 86% (n=6) other causes for control patients. The cox-proportional hazard model of reoperation within 1 year indicated that the odds of reoperation were 3.1 (95% CI:1.4-7.0) and 2.2 (95% CI 0.96-5.3) times higher in the TNF-AI and DMARD groups, respectively, compared to the control group.
Patients taking TNF-AIs before surgery were found to have a significantly higher rate of reoperation in the 1 year following surgery compared to controls. The higher rate of reoperation associated with TNF-AI use before spinal fusion surgery represents the potential for higher morbidity and costs for patient which is important to consider for both surgeon and patient in preoperative decision making.
在各种骨科手术中,术前使用 TNF-AI 与术后感染和并发症的发生率增加有关。然而,TNF-AI 使用与脊柱手术后并发症之间的关联尚未得到研究。
本研究旨在评估接受 TNF-AI 治疗的患者在接受脊柱融合手术后再次手术的风险。
这是一项回顾性研究。
2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间,在一家大型医疗机构接受脊柱融合手术的 427 名患者。
我们回顾性分析了 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间在一家大型医疗机构接受脊柱融合手术的患者的记录。研究中有三个不同的脊柱手术患者队列:术前 90 天内使用 TNF-AI 的患者、术前 90 天内使用非 TNF-AI DMARD 药物的患者以及术前 90 天内未使用 TNF-AI 或其他 DMARD 药物的患者。主要观察结果为术后 1 年内因任何原因再次手术。
我们的研究包括 90 名 TNF-AI 患者、90 名 DMARD 患者和 123 名对照患者。在 TNF-AI 组中,19%(n=17)、DMARD 组中 11%(n=10)和对照组中 6%(n=7)的患者在术后 1 年内需要再次手术。TNF-AI 组再次手术的原因是 47%(n=8)为感染,53%(n=9)为其他原因,包括融合失败和相邻节段疾病。DMARD 患者 1 年时再次手术的原因是 40%(n=4)为感染,60%(n=6)为其他原因,对照组为 14%(n=1)为感染,86%(n=6)为其他原因。术后 1 年内再次手术的 Cox 比例风险模型表明,与对照组相比,TNF-AI 组和 DMARD 组再次手术的可能性分别高出 3.1 倍(95%CI:1.4-7.0)和 2.2 倍(95%CI 0.96-5.3)。
与对照组相比,术前使用 TNF-AI 的患者在术后 1 年内再次手术的发生率明显更高。与脊柱融合术前使用 TNF-AI 相关的较高再次手术率代表了患者更高的发病率和更高的治疗费用,这在术前决策时对于外科医生和患者都很重要。