College of Physical Education, Shandong Normal University.
Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, The First Hospital Affiliated With Shandong First Medical University.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 22;100(3):e23963. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023963.
Exercise has been believed to have positive effects on blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, few medical evidences have been found to ascertain which type of exercise has the best effect on blood glucose control in diabetes and which type of exercise is more acceptable. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects and acceptability of different exercise modes on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients by using systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Relevant randomized controlled trial studies will be searched from PubMed, EMbase, CochraneCENTRAL, CNKI, VIP, and Chinese medical paper libraries. Primary outcome indicators: glycosylated hemoglobin and dropout rate of the research (number of dropouts/numbers of initially enrolled subjects). Secondary outcome measures: fasting blood glucose, body weight, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), diastolic pressure, systolic pressure (SBP). Two reviewers are arranged to screen Title, Abstract, and then review full text to further extract data. Standard meta-analysis and network meta-analysis of the data are performed afterward. Methodological quality assessment is planned to be conducted using Cochrane risk of bias tool. The outcome will be analyzed statistically according to Bayesian analysis methods. After that, subgroup analysis is conducted on the duration of intervention, whether there is supervision of intervention, frequency of intervention per week, age, gender, and medication use.
PROSPERO CRD42020175181.
The systematic review and network meta-analysis include evidence of the impact of different exercise modes on blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. There are 2 innovative points in this study. One is to conduct a classified study on exercise in as much detail as possible, and the other is to study the acceptability of different exercise modes. The network meta-analysis will reduce the uncertainty of intervention and enable clinicians, sports practitioners, and patients to choose more effective and suitable exercise methods.
The findings of the study will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences and symposia. Further, no ethical approval is required in this study.
运动被认为对 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制有积极影响。然而,很少有医学证据能够确定哪种运动对糖尿病患者的血糖控制效果最好,哪种运动更被接受。本研究旨在通过系统评价和网络荟萃分析比较不同运动方式对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的效果和可接受性。
将从 PubMed、EMbase、CochraneCENTRAL、CNKI、VIP 和中国医学文献库中搜索相关的随机对照试验研究。主要结局指标:糖化血红蛋白和研究的辍学率(辍学人数/最初纳入的受试者人数)。次要结局指标:空腹血糖、体重、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、甘油三酯(TG)、舒张压、收缩压(SBP)。安排两名评审员筛选标题、摘要,然后审阅全文以进一步提取数据。随后对数据进行标准荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析。计划使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具进行方法学质量评估。根据贝叶斯分析方法对结果进行统计分析。之后,根据干预持续时间、干预是否有监督、每周干预频率、年龄、性别和用药情况进行亚组分析。
PROSPERO CRD42020175181。
系统评价和网络荟萃分析包括不同运动方式对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制影响的证据。本研究有 2 个创新点。一是尽可能详细地对运动进行分类研究,二是研究不同运动方式的可接受性。网络荟萃分析将减少干预的不确定性,使临床医生、运动从业者和患者能够选择更有效和合适的运动方法。
本研究的结果将通过发表在同行评议期刊和科学会议和研讨会上进行传播。此外,本研究不需要伦理批准。