Suppr超能文献

CHA2DS2-VASc、ATRIA、Essen 卒中风险评分与非瓣膜性心房颤动相关性卒中:一项全国多中心注册研究。

CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, ATRIA, and Essen stroke risk scores in stroke with atrial fibrillation: A nationwide multicenter registry study.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine.

Department of Neurology, Seoul Hospital Ewha Womans University College of Medicine.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 22;100(3):e24000. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024000.

Abstract

The performance of scoring systems for risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) was not validated well in patients with stroke. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the risk scoring systems predict vascular outcomes in stroke patients with AF.Data were obtained from a nationwide multicenter registry for acute stroke with AF from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2015. We investigated the predictive power of the CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, ATRIA, and Essen stroke scores in stroke patients with AF. The subjects were further stratified into groups according to treatment with or without oral anticoagulants (OACs).A total of 3112 stroke with AF subjects were included. The rate of recurrent ischemic stroke and any stroke were not associated with the CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, ATRIA, and Essen stroke risk scores. The risks of death and major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events (MACEs) increased sequentially with the increase of each risk score in OAC group. (the range of C-index 0.544-0.558 for recurrent ischemic stroke; 0.523-0.537 for any stroke; 0.580-0.597 for death; 0.564-0.583 for MACEs). However, in the group treated with OACs, all risk scores were significantly associated with the risk of MACEs. The C-statistics of the 4 scoring systems were 0.544 to 0.558, 0.523 to 0.537, 0.580 to 0.597, 0.564 to 0.583, respectively, for recurrent ischemic stroke, any stroke, death, and MACEs.The performance of the CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, ATRIA, and Essen stroke risk scores for the prediction of recurrent stroke was unsatisfactory in stroke patients with AF whereas the performance for the prediction of recurrent stroke was not MACEs or death was good. A new risk stratification scheme that is specific for secondary stroke prevention in the AF population is needed.

摘要

房颤(AF)患者风险分层评分系统的性能在卒中患者中未得到充分验证。本研究旨在评估风险评分系统是否可预测伴有 AF 的卒中患者的血管结局。

数据来自于 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间全国性急性伴 AF 卒中多中心登记研究。我们调查了 CHADS2、CHA2DS2-VASc、ATRIA 和 Essen 卒中评分在伴有 AF 的卒中患者中的预测能力。受试者根据是否接受口服抗凝剂(OAC)治疗进一步分层。

共纳入 3112 例伴有 AF 的卒中患者。复发性缺血性卒中和任何卒中等风险与 CHADS2、CHA2DS2-VASc、ATRIA 和 Essen 卒中风险评分无关。在 OAC 组中,随着每个风险评分的增加,死亡和主要不良脑血管和心血管事件(MACE)的风险呈递增趋势(复发性缺血性卒中的 C 指数范围为 0.544-0.558;任何卒中为 0.523-0.537;死亡为 0.580-0.597;MACE 为 0.564-0.583)。然而,在接受 OAC 治疗的患者中,所有风险评分均与 MACE 风险显著相关。4 种评分系统的 C 统计量分别为 0.544 至 0.558、0.523 至 0.537、0.580 至 0.597、0.564 至 0.583,用于预测复发性缺血性卒中和任何卒中、死亡和 MACE。

CHADS2、CHA2DS2-VASc、ATRIA 和 Essen 卒中风险评分系统预测房颤患者复发性卒中的性能不理想,而预测复发性卒中或死亡的性能不佳。需要一种针对房颤人群二级预防的新风险分层方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0097/7837865/6694c169eb96/medi-100-e24000-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验