Suppr超能文献

今天回答一个事实问题会增加明天对同样答案的信心——与流利程度无关。

Answering a factual question today increases one's confidence in the same answer tomorrow - independent of fluency.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Williams College, 25 Stetson Ct, Williamstown, MA, 01267, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):962-968. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01882-4. Epub 2021 Feb 5.

Abstract

We investigated the cognitive processes that cause confidence to increase. Participants were asked 48 general-knowledge questions either once or three times, without feedback. After 2 min (Experiment 1) or 48 h (Experiment 2) they were asked the same questions again, and rated their confidence. Repeated questioning increased confidence but not accuracy. This increase, which replicated research on episodic memory in the eyewitness literature (e.g., Shaw, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2: 126-146, 1996), occurred even though accuracy was only around 25%. A mediation analysis identified response repetition, but not fluency, as a mechanism underlying growth in confidence. Thus, the basis for confidence judgments appears to be whether one's current response has been generated previously. In sum, answering a factual question increases confidence, but not accuracy, and this happens because learners use response repetition as a cue for confidence judgments.

摘要

我们研究了导致信心增加的认知过程。参与者被要求回答 48 个一般知识问题,要么只回答一次,要么重复回答三次,且没有反馈。2 分钟后(实验 1)或 48 小时后(实验 2),他们再次被要求回答相同的问题,并对自己的信心进行评分。重复提问会增加信心,但不会提高准确性。这种增加与目击者文献中的情景记忆研究(例如,Shaw,《实验心理学杂志:应用》2:126-146,1996)相吻合,即使准确性只有 25%左右。中介分析确定了反应重复,而不是流畅性,是信心增长的机制。因此,信心判断的基础似乎是一个人当前的反应是否之前已经产生过。总之,回答一个事实问题会增加信心,但不会提高准确性,这是因为学习者将反应重复作为信心判断的线索。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验