College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, California, Los Angeles, USA.
Dermatol Ther. 2021 Mar;34(2):e14851. doi: 10.1111/dth.14851. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic and often debilitating inflammatory condition characterized by frequent nodules, abscesses, sinus tracts, and scars impacting the intertriginous areas. Many patients with HS often report limited treatment success and symptom coverage with conventional therapies. Recent studies have reported the widespread use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among patients with HS. In this study, our aim was to examine current physician practice patterns, opinions, and comfort with recommending CAM. Our results indicate that provider comfort and opinions on CAM varied based on the provider's experiences, demographics, and the CAM modality itself. Overall, nearly two-thirds (n = 30, 61.2%) of respondents agreed that CAM and conventional medicine were more effective together than either alone. Meanwhile, 44.9% (n = 22) of respondents routinely recommend CAM while 64.6% (n = 31) of respondents reported that they are routinely asked about CAM. The majority (n = 41, 83.7%) of respondents indicated a lack of scientific evidence in the medical literature as a barrier to recommending CAM along with efficacy concerns (n = 34, 69.4%) and ability to recommend reputable CAM products (n = 32, 65.3%) and practitioners (n = 32, 65.3%). Future investigations are warranted to establish a better understanding of the efficacy and benefit of CAM methods in conjunction with conventional methods.
化脓性汗腺炎(HS)是一种慢性且常使人虚弱的炎症性疾病,其特征是频繁出现结节、脓肿、窦道和疤痕,影响皱褶部位。许多 HS 患者经常报告常规疗法的治疗效果有限,且症状缓解有限。最近的研究报告称,HS 患者广泛使用补充和替代医学(CAM)。在这项研究中,我们旨在检查当前医生的实践模式、意见以及对推荐 CAM 的舒适度。我们的研究结果表明,提供者对 CAM 的舒适度和意见因提供者的经验、人口统计学特征和 CAM 模式本身而异。总体而言,近三分之二(n = 30,61.2%)的受访者认为 CAM 和常规医学一起使用比单独使用更有效。同时,44.9%(n = 22)的受访者经常推荐 CAM,而 64.6%(n = 31)的受访者报告他们经常被问及 CAM。大多数(n = 41,83.7%)受访者表示缺乏医学文献中的科学证据是推荐 CAM 的障碍,同时还存在疗效问题(n = 34,69.4%)、缺乏推荐可靠的 CAM 产品(n = 32,65.3%)和从业者(n = 32,65.3%)。需要进一步的研究来更好地了解 CAM 方法与常规方法联合使用的疗效和益处。