Sherman M E, Arkin C F, Chaplin A
Department of Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10467.
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1988 Jan-Feb;18(1):19-23.
While many features are regularly considered in selecting control reagents, the responsiveness of these products to methodologic errors is frequently overlooked. To address this issue with regard to commercially prepared whole blood cell controls, mean cell volume (MCV) determinations were performed on several preserved red blood cell controls and fresh blood in the presence of various artifacts. The effects contaminating the isotonic diluent with water, saline, or bleach were compared. Although our results indicate that preserved and fresh RBCs generally behave similarly, large differences were observed in the responses to hypotonic stress among controls and between controls and fresh specimens. As this may have clinical relevance, our data highlight the need for testing the responsiveness of controls to commonly encountered methodologic variables as part of the routine evaluation of these products.
虽然在选择对照试剂时通常会考虑许多特性,但这些产品对方法学误差的反应性常常被忽视。为了解决商业制备的全血细胞对照的这一问题,在存在各种假象的情况下,对几种保存的红细胞对照和新鲜血液进行了平均红细胞体积(MCV)测定。比较了用水、盐水或漂白剂污染等渗稀释剂的影响。尽管我们的结果表明保存的和新鲜的红细胞通常表现相似,但在对照之间以及对照与新鲜标本之间,对低渗应激的反应存在很大差异。由于这可能具有临床相关性,我们的数据强调了作为这些产品常规评估的一部分,测试对照对常见方法学变量的反应性的必要性。