Suppr超能文献

提高美国低摄入食物组和营养素消费水平的具有成本效益的选择。

Cost-effective options for increasing consumption of under-consumed food groups and nutrients in the USA.

机构信息

PepsiCo R&D Nutrition, Chicago, IL, USA.

Nutrition Impact LLC, 9275 D Drive North, Battle Creek, MI49014, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2022 Mar;25(3):710-716. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021000537. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the most cost-effective options/contributors of under-consumed food groups and nutrients in the USA.

DESIGN

Twenty-four-hour dietary recall data were used for the dietary sources of under-consumed food groups and nutrients. Costs were estimated using USDA National Food Price Database 2001-2004 after adjustments for inflation using Consumer Price Index.

SETTING

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013-2016.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 10 112 adults aged 19+ years.

RESULTS

Top five cost-effective options for food groups were apple and citrus juice, bananas, apples, and melons for fruit; baked/boiled white potatoes, mixtures of mashed potatoes, lettuce, carrots and string beans for vegetables; oatmeal, popcorn, rice, yeast breads and pasta/noodles/cooked grains for whole grain; and reduced-fat, low-fat milk, flavoured milk and cheese for dairy. Top five cost-effective sources of under-consumed nutrients were rice, tortillas, pasta/noodles/cooked grains, rolls and buns, and peanut butter-jelly sandwiches for Mg; grits/cooked cereals, low- and high-sugar ready-to-eat (RTE) cereal, rolls and buns, and rice for Fe; low- and high-sugar RTE cereals, rice, protein and nutritional powders, and rolls and buns for Zn; carrots, margarine, other red and orange vegetables, liver and organ meats, butter and animal fats for vitamin A; and citrus juice, other fruit juice, vegetable juice, mustard and other condiments, and apple juice for vitamin C.

CONCLUSIONS

Apple/citrus juice, white potatoes/carrots, oatmeal, RTE cereals and milk were the most cost-effective food sources of multiple under-consumed food groups and nutrients and can help promote healthy eating habits at minimal cost.

摘要

目的

确定美国未充分摄入食物组和营养素的最具成本效益的选择/贡献者。

设计

使用 24 小时膳食回顾数据来确定未充分摄入食物组和营养素的膳食来源。在使用消费者价格指数对通货膨胀进行调整后,使用 USDA 国家食品价格数据库 2001-2004 来估算成本。

设置

全国健康和营养检查调查,2013-2016 年。

参与者

共有 10112 名 19 岁及以上的成年人。

结果

水果中最具成本效益的五种选择是苹果和柑橘汁、香蕉、苹果和瓜类;蔬菜中最具成本效益的五种选择是烤/煮白土豆、土豆泥混合物、生菜、胡萝卜和青豆;全谷物中最具成本效益的五种选择是燕麦片、爆米花、大米、酵母面包和面条/煮熟的谷物;乳制品中最具成本效益的五种选择是低脂、低脂肪牛奶、风味牛奶和奶酪。未充分摄入的五种最具成本效益的营养素来源是大米、玉米饼、面条/煮熟的谷物、面包卷和小圆面包、花生酱-果冻三明治,用于 Mg;玉米粥/煮熟的谷物、低糖和高糖即食(RTE)谷物、面包卷和小圆面包、大米用于 Fe;低糖和高糖 RTE 谷物、大米、蛋白质和营养粉、面包卷和小圆面包用于 Zn;胡萝卜、人造黄油、其他红色和橙色蔬菜、肝脏和器官肉、黄油和动物脂肪用于维生素 A;以及橙汁、其他果汁、蔬菜汁、芥末和其他调味料、苹果汁用于维生素 C。

结论

苹果/柑橘汁、白土豆/胡萝卜、燕麦片、RTE 谷物和牛奶是多种未充分摄入食物组和营养素的最具成本效益的食物来源,并且可以以最小的成本帮助促进健康的饮食习惯。

相似文献

8
Dietary intake of whole grains.全谷物的膳食摄入量。
J Am Coll Nutr. 2000 Jun;19(3 Suppl):331S-338S. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2000.10718969.

本文引用的文献

9
Are socio-economic disparities in diet quality explained by diet cost?饮食质量的社会经济差异是否可以用饮食成本来解释?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Jun;66(6):530-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.122333. Epub 2010 Dec 10.
10
Relation of food cost to healthfulness of diet among US women.美国女性饮食健康与食物成本的关系。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Nov;92(5):1197-203. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29854. Epub 2010 Sep 1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验