Klee G G, Forsman R W
Division of Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):371-3.
Laboratory results judged as unacceptable in external proficiency surveys do not always signal laboratory testing problems. This is a report of the results of a user's investigation of the proficiency testing flags encountered in our laboratory from three survey programs over a two-year period. The survey programs were administered by the College of American Pathologists, the Centers for Disease Control, and the State of New York. The explanations for the abnormal survey results were classified into six categories: possible analytic measurement problem (28%), clerical error in transcription or completion of forms (16%), inappropriate survey criteria (17%), specimen problem (11%), agency amended report (5%), and no identifiable cause (23%).
在外部能力验证调查中被判定为不可接受的实验室结果并不总是意味着实验室检测存在问题。这是一份关于用户对我们实验室在两年时间里从三个调查项目中遇到的能力验证标记结果进行调查的报告。这些调查项目由美国病理学家学会、疾病控制中心和纽约州管理。对异常调查结果的解释分为六类：可能的分析测量问题（28%）、表格转录或填写中的文书错误（16%）、不适当的调查标准（17%）、标本问题（11%）、机构修改报告（5%）以及无法确定原因（23%）。
