• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

退行性二尖瓣后叶脱垂的四边形切除术与腱索置换术对比

Quadrangular resection versus chordal replacement for degenerative posterior mitral leaflet prolapse.

作者信息

Ma Jiexu, Liu Jian, Wei Peijian, Yao Ximeng, Zhang Yuyuan, Fang Liangzheng, Chen Zhao, Liu Yanjun, Tan Tong, Wu Hongxiang, Huang Huanlei, Xie Bin, Chen Jimei, Zhuang Jian, Guo Huiming

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Guangzhou, China.

Medical College, Shantou University, Shantou, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(1):60. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7475.

DOI:10.21037/atm-20-7475
PMID:33553353
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7859790/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aims of the present study was to compare midterm results of quadrangular leaflet resection versus chordal replacement for the repair of degenerative posterior mitral leaflet (PML) prolapse, and to explore the risk factors for recurrent severe mitral regurgitation (MR).

METHODS

From January 2012 to December 2018, 1,423 consecutive patients underwent mitral valve (MV) repair. A total of 317 had degenerative PML prolapse and constituted the study population. Of these, 74 (23.3%) underwent quadrangular leaflet resection, and 243 (76.7%) underwent chordal replacement. Outcomes were compared by using unadjusted data and propensity score-matched analyses.

RESULTS

Patients with multiple leaflet prolapse were more likely to undergo chordal replacement (18.4% 41.9%, P<0.001), and performed as a minimally invasive approach (47.3% 61.7%, P=0.027). Of the entire cohort, 1 death (0.3%) occurred due to intraoperative aortic dissection, and 1 patient who had undergone chordal replacement required reoperation before discharge for posterior leaflet tearing. There was no significant difference in the probability of freedom from recurrent severe MR at 82 months between the resection and neochordae groups in both the pre-matched (95.6% 88.8%, P=0.105) and matched (95.2% 88.5%, P=0.170) cohorts, which was consistent across all of the examined subgroups (P>0.05). Multivariate Cox regression indicated that dilated left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) was an independent risk factor for recurrent severe MR [<40 >40 mm, hazards ratio (HR): 3.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20-8.39, P=0.020]; however, surgical technique was not (resection neochordae, HR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.07-1.37, P=0.122).

CONCLUSIONS

Chordal replacement for the repair of degenerative posterior MV prolapse yields similar satisfactory outcomes when compared with quadrangular resection, and is promising in minimally invasive cardiac surgery for various lesions. However, it is also associated with more recurrent severe MR, albeit non-significant, for which patients with dilated LVESD are at high risk.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较四边形瓣叶切除术与腱索置换术治疗退行性二尖瓣后叶(PML)脱垂的中期结果,并探讨复发性严重二尖瓣反流(MR)的危险因素。

方法

2012年1月至2018年12月,1423例连续患者接受二尖瓣(MV)修复术。共有317例患有退行性PML脱垂,构成研究人群。其中,74例(23.3%)接受四边形瓣叶切除术,243例(76.7%)接受腱索置换术。通过使用未调整数据和倾向评分匹配分析比较结果。

结果

多瓣叶脱垂患者更有可能接受腱索置换术(18.4%对41.9%,P<0.001),并且作为微创方法进行(47.3%对61.7%,P=0.027)。在整个队列中,1例(0.3%)因术中主动脉夹层死亡,1例接受腱索置换术的患者在出院前因后叶撕裂需要再次手术。在未匹配队列(95.6%对88.8%,P=0.105)和匹配队列(95.2%对88.5%,P=0.170)中,切除组和新腱索组在82个月时无复发性严重MR的概率无显著差异,在所有检查的亚组中均一致(P>0.05)。多变量Cox回归表明,左心室舒张末期内径(LVESD)扩大是复发性严重MR的独立危险因素[<40对>40 mm,风险比(HR):3.17,95%置信区间(CI):1.20-8.39,P=0.020];然而,手术技术不是(切除对新腱索,HR:0.31,95%CI:0.07-1.37,P=0.122)。

结论

与四边形切除术相比,腱索置换术治疗退行性二尖瓣后叶脱垂的效果相似,令人满意,并且在微创心脏手术治疗各种病变方面很有前景。然而,它也与更多的复发性严重MR相关,尽管不显著,LVESD扩大的患者对此风险较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c8f/7859790/13ad92a16c5e/atm-09-01-60-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c8f/7859790/89d53e63f4ed/atm-09-01-60-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c8f/7859790/a5ea61347163/atm-09-01-60-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c8f/7859790/c2c53eb47345/atm-09-01-60-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c8f/7859790/1e2e5ed0dcd6/atm-09-01-60-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c8f/7859790/13ad92a16c5e/atm-09-01-60-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c8f/7859790/89d53e63f4ed/atm-09-01-60-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c8f/7859790/a5ea61347163/atm-09-01-60-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c8f/7859790/c2c53eb47345/atm-09-01-60-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c8f/7859790/1e2e5ed0dcd6/atm-09-01-60-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c8f/7859790/13ad92a16c5e/atm-09-01-60-f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Quadrangular resection versus chordal replacement for degenerative posterior mitral leaflet prolapse.退行性二尖瓣后叶脱垂的四边形切除术与腱索置换术对比
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(1):60. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7475.
2
Mitral-valve repair without annuloplasty rings: results after repair of anterior leaflet versus posterior-leaflet defects using polytetrafluoroethylene sutures for chordal replacement.不使用瓣环成形环的二尖瓣修复:使用聚四氟乙烯缝线进行腱索置换修复前叶与后叶缺损后的结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000 Mar;17(3):206-12. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00352-3.
3
Chordal replacement versus quadrangular resection in degenerative posterior mitral leaflet repair.退行性二尖瓣后叶修复中腱索置换与四边形切除的比较
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Mar;11(3):827-838. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.02.17.
4
Left ventricular performance early after repair for posterior mitral leaflet prolapse: Chordal replacement versus leaflet resection.二尖瓣后叶脱垂修复术后早期左心室功能:腱索置换与瓣叶切除。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;150(3):538-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.06.022. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
5
Chordal replacement versus quadrangular resection for repair of isolated posterior mitral leaflet prolapse.腱索置换与四边形切除术治疗孤立性二尖瓣后叶脱垂。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;89(4):1163-70; discussion 1170. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.12.057.
6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of chordal replacement versus leaflet resection for posterior mitral leaflet prolapse.系统评价和荟萃分析:后二尖瓣叶脱垂中腱索置换与瓣叶切除的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jan;155(1):120-128.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.07.078. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
7
Neochordae implantation versus leaflet resection in mitral valve posterior leaflet prolapse and dilated left ventricle: a propensity score matching comparison with long-term follow-up.腱索植入与瓣叶切除治疗二尖瓣后叶脱垂伴左心室扩张:长期随访的倾向性评分匹配比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Oct 4;64(4). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad274.
8
Controversy in mitral valve repair, resection or chordal replacement?二尖瓣修复、切除或腱索置换的争议?
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Oct;62(10):581-5. doi: 10.1007/s11748-014-0459-x. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
9
Long-term outcomes of chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures to repair mitral leaflet prolapse.采用膨体聚四氟乙烯缝线行腱索置换修复二尖瓣瓣叶脱垂的长期疗效。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Aug;160(2):385-394.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
10
Chordae replacement versus resection for repair of isolated posterior mitral leaflet prolapse: à ègalité.孤立性二尖瓣后叶脱垂修复中腱索置换与切除:效果相同。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jun;87(6):1715-20. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Posterior leaflet reconstruction in mitral valve repair: Does resect versus respect strategy matter?二尖瓣修复术中后叶重建:切除与保留策略重要吗?
JTCVS Open. 2025 Jun 23;26:94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.06.009. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Survival and Durability of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair: Insights from Different Repair Techniques.微创二尖瓣修复的生存率和耐久性:不同修复技术的见解。
Med Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 2;12(3):46. doi: 10.3390/medsci12030046.
3
Recurrent mitral regurgitation after repair of Barlow's disease in a single-center retrospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Combined off-pump mitral repair and thoracoscopic maze surgery.体外循环下二尖瓣修复联合胸腔镜迷宫手术。
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2021 Mar;29(3):217-219. doi: 10.1177/0218492320963978. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
2
Outcomes with percutaneous mitral repair optimal medical treatment for functional mitral regurgitation: systematic review.经皮二尖瓣修复术与功能性二尖瓣反流最佳药物治疗的疗效:系统评价
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Aug;8(15):962. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.202.
3
Percutaneous treatment with Mitraclip for functional mitral regurgitation: medium-term follow up according to left ventricular function.
一项单中心回顾性队列研究:巴洛氏病修复术后复发性二尖瓣反流
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Aug 1;14(8):5946-5960. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-1768. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
4
Midterm outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery in a heterogeneous valve pathology cohort: respect or resect?不同瓣膜病变队列中行微创二尖瓣手术的中期结果:保留还是切除?
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Jun 30;15(6):3013-3024. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-1796. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
5
Propensity Matched Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Mitral Surgery: Does a Heart-Team Approach Eliminate Female Gender as an Independent Risk Factor?微创二尖瓣手术的倾向匹配结果:心脏团队方法能否消除女性作为独立危险因素的影响?
J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 3;13(6):949. doi: 10.3390/jpm13060949.
6
Simple and Safe: Inverse Plication of the Posterior Mitral Leaflet in Everyday Mitral Valve Reconstruction with and without Concomitant Procedures.简单且安全:在日常二尖瓣重建术中,联合或不联合其他手术时,对二尖瓣后叶瓣叶进行反向折叠。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 23;59(2):218. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020218.
经皮使用Mitraclip治疗功能性二尖瓣反流:根据左心室功能进行的中期随访
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Aug;8(15):959. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.122.
4
Two-Port Thoracoscopic Myectomy for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy With Three-Dimensional Printing.双端口胸腔镜心肌切除术治疗肥厚型心肌病的三维打印技术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Mar;111(3):e165-e168. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.183. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
5
A novel cross-species model of Barlow's disease to biomechanically analyze repair techniques in an ex vivo left heart simulator.一种新型的巴洛氏病跨物种模型,用于在体外左心模拟器中对修复技术进行生物力学分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 May;161(5):1776-1783. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.01.086. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
6
Degenerative Mitral Valve Repair Simplified: An Evolution to Universal Artificial Cordal Repair.退行性二尖瓣修复简化:向通用人工腱索修复的演进。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Aug;110(2):464-473. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.10.068. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
7
Long-term outcomes of chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures to repair mitral leaflet prolapse.采用膨体聚四氟乙烯缝线行腱索置换修复二尖瓣瓣叶脱垂的长期疗效。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Aug;160(2):385-394.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
8
Chordal replacement versus quadrangular resection in degenerative posterior mitral leaflet repair.退行性二尖瓣后叶修复中腱索置换与四边形切除的比较
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Mar;11(3):827-838. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.02.17.
9
Mitral Valve Repair Versus Replacement in Elderly With Degenerative Disease: Analysis of the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.老年退行性心脏瓣膜病患者二尖瓣修复与置换的比较:STS 成人心脏外科学数据库分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Mar;107(3):747-753. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
10
Transapical NeoChord mitral valve repair.经心尖NeoChord二尖瓣修复术。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Nov;7(6):812-820. doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.11.04.