• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验室检查的医学相关性。临床视角。

Medical relevance of laboratory tests. A clinical perspective.

作者信息

Watts N B

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):379-82.

PMID:3355337
Abstract

To address the role of proficiency testing in the medical usefulness of laboratory tests, nine steps involved in the generation and application of a laboratory test result are identified and discussed: test ordering, patient preparation, specimen, sample, analysis, result, reporting, recognition, and action. Clinical uses of test results are enumerated. Good clinical skills are necessary for optimal test efficiency. Clinicians should improve their selection of tests, pay attention to proper patient preparation, and refine the process of interpretation of test results using disease-based reference ranges and more formal analysis of predictive value. By better definition of the clinical uses of laboratory tests, appropriate attention can be directed to steps in the laboratory domain such as medically relevant goals for accuracy and precision. With clearer understanding of the testing process, proficiency testing for monitoring laboratory performance can be more fully utilized. Audit models should be developed that include assessment of the outcome of the laboratory testing process.

摘要

为探讨能力验证在实验室检测医学实用性中的作用,本文确定并讨论了实验室检测结果产生及应用所涉及的九个步骤:检测医嘱、患者准备、标本、样本、分析、结果、报告、识别及行动。列举了检测结果的临床用途。良好的临床技能对于实现最佳检测效率至关重要。临床医生应改进检测项目的选择,注重患者的适当准备,并利用基于疾病的参考范围和更正式的预测值分析来完善检测结果的解读过程。通过更明确地界定实验室检测的临床用途,可以将适当的注意力导向实验室领域的各个步骤,如医学上相关的准确性和精密度目标。随着对检测过程的更清晰理解,可更充分地利用能力验证来监测实验室性能。应开发包括对实验室检测过程结果评估的审核模型。

相似文献

1
Medical relevance of laboratory tests. A clinical perspective.实验室检查的医学相关性。临床视角。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):379-82.
2
A theoretical basis for clinically relevant proficiency testing evaluation limits. Sensitivity analysis of the effect of inherent test variability on acceptable method error.临床相关能力验证评估限度的理论基础。固有检测变异性对可接受方法误差影响的敏感性分析。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):421-34.
3
Cholesterol measurements. Quality assurance and medical usefulness interrelationships.胆固醇测量:质量保证与医学实用性的相互关系
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):387-91.
4
Proficiency testing in laboratory medicine: uses and limitations.检验医学中的能力验证:用途与局限性
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 Jan;122(1):15-30.
5
Proposed goals for analytical precision and accuracy in single-point diagnostic testing. Theoretical basis and comparison with data from College of American Pathologists proficiency surveys.单点诊断检测中分析精密度和准确度的拟议目标。理论基础及与美国病理学家学会能力验证调查数据的比较。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):416-20.
6
Multiprogram characterization of laboratory bias, precision, and total error. Proposal for improved assessment with shared external and expanded internal (regional) quality control pools.实验室偏倚、精密度和总误差的多程序特征描述。关于利用共享外部和扩展内部(区域)质量控制样本池改进评估的建议。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):454-61.
7
Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals.机构间床边血糖监测项目特征、准确性表现及质量控制文件的比较:美国病理学家学会Q-Probes对226家小型医院床边血糖监测的研究
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 Jun;122(6):495-502.
8
Changes in emergency department turnaround time performance from 1990 to 1993. A comparison of two College of American Pathologists Q-probes studies.1990年至1993年急诊科周转时间表现的变化。两项美国病理学家学会Q-探针研究的比较。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Oct;121(10):1031-41.
9
Use of proficiency test performance to determine clinical laboratory director qualifications.利用能力验证结果来确定临床实验室主任资质。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):349-53.
10
CDC's Model Performance Evaluation Program: assessment of the quality of laboratory performance for HIV-1 antibody testing.美国疾病控制与预防中心的模型性能评估计划:HIV-1抗体检测实验室性能质量评估
Public Health Rep. 1990 Mar-Apr;105(2):167-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolving approaches to management of quality in clinical microbiology.临床微生物学质量控制的不断发展的管理方法。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1994 Jan;7(1):55-88. doi: 10.1128/CMR.7.1.55.