• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在炎症性肠病中使用益生菌、益生元和合生菌的临床效果和肠道微生物群变化:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Clinical effects and gut microbiota changes of using probiotics, prebiotics or synbiotics in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, 100 Kexue Avenue, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, China.

出版信息

Eur J Nutr. 2021 Aug;60(5):2855-2875. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02503-5. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00394-021-02503-5
PMID:33555375
Abstract

PURPOSE

Probiotics have been reported to be beneficial for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but the types, number of strains, dosage, and intervention time of probiotics used remain controversial. Furthermore, the changes of gut microbiota in IBD's patients are also intriguing. Thus, this meta-analysis was to explore the clinical effects and gut microbiota changes of using probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in IBD.

METHODS

The search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane library from inception to April 2020. Qualified randomized controlled trials were included. IBD's remission rate, disease activity index and recurrence rate were extracted and analyzed. Changes in the gut microbiota of patients with IBD are comprehensively described.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight articles were included. Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics can induce/maintain IBD's remission and reduce ulcerative colitis (UC) disease activity index (RR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.02, 1.26, P < 0.05; SMD = 1.00, 95% CI 0.27, 1.73, P < 0.05). In subgroup analyses of IBD remission rate and UC disease activity index, we obtained some statistically significant results in some subgroup (P < 0.05). To some extent, probiotic supplements can increase the number of beneficial bacteria (especially Bifidobacteria) in the intestinal tract of patients with IBD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the treatment of IBD (especially UC) with pro/pre/synbiotics, and synbiotics are more effective. Probiotic supplements that are based on Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium or more than one strain are more likely to be beneficial for IBD remission. The dose of 10-10 CFU/day may be a reference range for using probiotics to relieve IBD.

摘要

目的

益生菌已被报道对炎症性肠病(IBD)有益,但使用的益生菌的种类、菌株数量、剂量和干预时间仍存在争议。此外,IBD 患者肠道微生物群的变化也很有趣。因此,本荟萃分析旨在探讨益生菌、益生元和合生菌在 IBD 中的临床疗效和肠道微生物群变化。

方法

从建库到 2020 年 4 月,在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆中进行了检索。纳入合格的随机对照试验。提取并分析 IBD 的缓解率、疾病活动指数和复发率。综合描述 IBD 患者肠道微生物群的变化。

结果

共纳入 38 篇文章。益生菌、益生元和合生菌可诱导/维持 IBD 缓解,降低溃疡性结肠炎(UC)疾病活动指数(RR=1.13,95%CI 1.02,1.26,P<0.05;SMD=1.00,95%CI 0.27,1.73,P<0.05)。在 IBD 缓解率和 UC 疾病活动指数的亚组分析中,我们在一些亚组中获得了一些具有统计学意义的结果(P<0.05)。在一定程度上,益生菌补充剂可以增加 IBD 患者肠道内有益菌(特别是双歧杆菌)的数量。

结论

我们的结果支持使用 pro/pre/synbiotics 治疗 IBD(尤其是 UC),并且合生菌更有效。基于乳杆菌和双歧杆菌或以上菌株的益生菌补充剂更有可能有益于 IBD 缓解。10-10 CFU/天的剂量可能是使用益生菌缓解 IBD 的参考范围。

相似文献

1
Clinical effects and gut microbiota changes of using probiotics, prebiotics or synbiotics in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在炎症性肠病中使用益生菌、益生元和合生菌的临床效果和肠道微生物群变化:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Nutr. 2021 Aug;60(5):2855-2875. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02503-5. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
2
Role of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics in management of inflammatory bowel disease: Current perspectives.益生元、益生菌和合生菌在炎症性肠病治疗中的作用:当前观点。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 14;29(14):2078-2100. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i14.2078.
3
The effects of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics on the reduction of IBD complications, a periodic review during 2009-2020.益生菌、益生元和合生菌对减少炎症性肠病并发症的影响,2009-2020 年定期综述。
J Appl Microbiol. 2021 Jun;130(6):1823-1838. doi: 10.1111/jam.14907. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
4
Beneficial Effects of Probiotics, Prebiotics, Synbiotics, and Psychobiotics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.益生菌、益生元、合生元和精神益生菌在炎症性肠病中的有益作用。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015 Jul;21(7):1674-82. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000364.
5
Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in inflammatory bowel disease.益生菌、益生元及合生元用于炎症性肠病的随机对照试验的系统评价
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 9;7:473-87. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S27530. eCollection 2014.
6
The Efficacy of Probiotics, Prebiotics, Synbiotics, and Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.益生菌、益生元、合生菌和粪便微生物群移植治疗肠易激综合征的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2024 Jul 2;16(13):2114. doi: 10.3390/nu16132114.
7
Efficacy of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.益生菌、益生元和合生剂在肠易激综合征中的疗效:随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Microbiol. 2023 Sep;72(9). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001758.
8
Reviewing the potential of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics: advancements in treatment of ulcerative colitis.探讨益生菌、益生元和合生菌的潜力:溃疡性结肠炎治疗的新进展。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Dec 8;13:1268041. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1268041. eCollection 2023.
9
The effect of probiotics, prebiotics or synbiotics on metabolic outcomes in individuals with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.益生菌、益生元或合生菌对糖尿病患者代谢结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetologia. 2021 Jan;64(1):26-41. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05295-1. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
10
Prebiotics, synbiotics and inflammatory bowel disease.益生元、合生元与炎症性肠病
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2008 Aug;52(8):898-905. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200700139.

引用本文的文献

1
Emerging concepts and shifting paradigms for understanding the microbial basis of inflammatory bowel diseases.理解炎症性肠病微生物基础的新观念与转变中的范式
J Clin Invest. 2025 Sep 2;135(17). doi: 10.1172/JCI193969.
2
Unraveling the Converging Roles of ASC-Dependent Inflammasomes, Interleukin-1 Superfamily Members, Serum Amyloid A, and Non-Sterile Inflammation in Disease Pathology and Fibrosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.解析ASC依赖性炎性小体、白细胞介素-1超家族成员、血清淀粉样蛋白A以及非无菌性炎症在炎症性肠病和原发性硬化性胆管炎的疾病病理学和纤维化中的共同作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Aug 20;26(16):8042. doi: 10.3390/ijms26168042.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Endogenous LC-PUFA biosynthesis capability in commercially important mollusks.商业上重要的软体动物内源性 LC-PUFA 生物合成能力。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(10):2836-2844. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1860896. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
2
in Neuropsychiatric Disorders-A Systematic Review.在《神经精神疾病的系统综述》中。
Nutrients. 2020 Dec 19;12(12):3894. doi: 10.3390/nu12123894.
3
Clinical utilization of chromosomal microarray analysis for the genetic analysis in subgroups of pregnancy loss.染色体微阵列分析在妊娠丢失亚组遗传分析中的临床应用。
A Systemic Perspective of the Link Between Microbiota and Cardiac Health: A Literature Review.
微生物群与心脏健康关联的系统视角:文献综述
Life (Basel). 2025 Aug 7;15(8):1251. doi: 10.3390/life15081251.
4
Probiotics in inflammatory bowel diseases: emphasis on mechanisms and clinical application.炎症性肠病中的益生菌:着重于作用机制及临床应用
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 1;12:1620079. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1620079. eCollection 2025.
5
Acute pancreatitis gut dysbiosis persists at 1-year follow-up and is associated with clinical outcomes.急性胰腺炎肠道菌群失调在1年随访时持续存在,并与临床结局相关。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2025 Sep;81(3):690-698. doi: 10.1002/jpn3.70135. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
6
Cheese starter cultures attenuate inflammation in the in vitro Caco-2 model.奶酪发酵剂培养物可减轻体外Caco-2模型中的炎症。
AIMS Microbiol. 2025 May 28;11(2):369-387. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025017. eCollection 2025.
7
Anti-Inflammatory Peptides as Promising Therapeutics Agent Against Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review.抗炎肽作为治疗炎症性肠病的有前景的治疗剂:一项系统评价。
JGH Open. 2025 Jun 29;9(7):e70212. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70212. eCollection 2025 Jul.
8
Gut Microbiota-Targeted Therapeutics for Metabolic Disorders: Mechanistic Insights into the Synergy of Probiotic-Fermented Herbal Bioactives.针对代谢紊乱的肠道微生物群靶向疗法:对益生菌发酵草药生物活性成分协同作用的机制洞察
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jun 7;26(12):5486. doi: 10.3390/ijms26125486.
9
Prebiotics and Probiotics Supplementation in Pigs as a Model for Human Gut Health and Disease.以猪为模型补充益生元和益生菌对人类肠道健康与疾病的研究
Biomolecules. 2025 May 3;15(5):665. doi: 10.3390/biom15050665.
10
Anti-inflammatory effects and gut microbiota modulation of synbiotic mulberry in DSS-induced colitis rats.合生元桑椹对葡聚糖硫酸钠诱导的结肠炎大鼠的抗炎作用及肠道微生物群调节作用
Mol Cell Biochem. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s11010-025-05309-9.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Nov;35(22):4404-4411. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1849126. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
4
The effects of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics on the reduction of IBD complications, a periodic review during 2009-2020.益生菌、益生元和合生菌对减少炎症性肠病并发症的影响,2009-2020 年定期综述。
J Appl Microbiol. 2021 Jun;130(6):1823-1838. doi: 10.1111/jam.14907. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
5
Vitamin D Therapy in Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.成人炎症性肠病的维生素 D 治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2020 Nov 19;26(12):1819-1830. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa087.
6
Effect of Lactocare® Synbiotic on Disease Severity in Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Clinical Trial.Lactocare®益生菌对溃疡性结肠炎疾病严重程度的影响:一项随机安慰剂对照双盲临床试验
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2020 Jan;12(1):27-33. doi: 10.15171/mejdd.2020.160.
7
Preclinical and clinical relevance of probiotics and synbiotics in colorectal carcinogenesis: a systematic review.益生菌和合生菌在结直肠癌变中的临床前和临床相关性:系统评价。
Nutr Rev. 2020 Aug 1;78(8):667-687. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuz087.
8
The microbiome and inflammatory bowel disease.肠道微生物群与炎症性肠病。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Jan;145(1):16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.11.003.
9
Glucose-induced microRNA-218 suppresses the proliferation and promotes the apoptosis of human retinal pigment epithelium cells by targeting RUNX2.葡萄糖诱导的 microRNA-218 通过靶向 RUNX2 抑制人视网膜色素上皮细胞的增殖并促进其凋亡。
Biosci Rep. 2019 Dec 20;39(12). doi: 10.1042/BSR20192580.
10
Efficacy and safety of bifid triple viable plus aminosalicylic acid for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.双歧三联活菌联合氨基水杨酸治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(47):e17955. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017955.