Suppr超能文献

法国具有代表性的工作年龄人群中对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度:一项基于疫苗特性的调查实验

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a representative working-age population in France: a survey experiment based on vaccine characteristics.

作者信息

Schwarzinger Michaël, Watson Verity, Arwidson Pierre, Alla François, Luchini Stéphane

机构信息

Department of Methodology and Innovation in Prevention, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France; University of Bordeaux, Inserm UMR 1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France.

Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Public Health. 2021 Apr;6(4):e210-e221. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00012-8. Epub 2021 Feb 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opinion polls on vaccination intentions suggest that COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is increasing worldwide; however, the usefulness of opinion polls to prepare mass vaccination campaigns for specific new vaccines and to estimate acceptance in a country's population is limited. We therefore aimed to assess the effects of vaccine characteristics, information on herd immunity, and general practitioner (GP) recommendation on vaccine hesitancy in a representative working-age population in France.

METHODS

In this survey experiment, adults aged 18-64 years residing in France, with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, were randomly selected from an online survey research panel in July, 2020, stratified by gender, age, education, household size, and region and area of residence to be representative of the French population. Participants completed an online questionnaire on their background and vaccination behaviour-related variables (including past vaccine compliance, risk factors for severe COVID-19, and COVID-19 perceptions and experience), and were then randomly assigned according to a full factorial design to one of three groups to receive differing information on herd immunity (>50% of adults aged 18-64 years must be immunised [either by vaccination or infection]; >50% of adults must be immunised [either by vaccination or infection]; or no information on herd immunity) and to one of two groups regarding GP recommendation of vaccination (GP recommends vaccination or expresses no opinion). Participants then completed a series of eight discrete choice tasks designed to assess vaccine acceptance or refusal based on hypothetical vaccine characteristics (efficacy [50%, 80%, 90%, or 100%], risk of serious side-effects [1 in 10 000 or 1 in 100 000], location of manufacture [EU, USA, or China], and place of administration [GP practice, local pharmacy, or mass vaccination centre]). Responses were analysed with a two-part model to disentangle outright vaccine refusal (irrespective of vaccine characteristics, defined as opting for no vaccination in all eight tasks) from vaccine hesitancy (acceptance depending on vaccine characteristics).

FINDINGS

Survey responses were collected from 1942 working-age adults, of whom 560 (28·8%) opted for no vaccination in all eight tasks (outright vaccine refusal) and 1382 (71·2%) did not. In our model, outright vaccine refusal and vaccine hesitancy were both significantly associated with female gender, age (with an inverted U-shaped relationship), lower educational level, poor compliance with recommended vaccinations in the past, and no report of specified chronic conditions (ie, no hypertension [for vaccine hesitancy] or no chronic conditions other than hypertension [for outright vaccine refusal]). Outright vaccine refusal was also associated with a lower perceived severity of COVID-19, whereas vaccine hesitancy was lower when herd immunity benefits were communicated and in working versus non-working individuals, and those with experience of COVID-19 (had symptoms or knew someone with COVID-19). For a mass vaccination campaign involving mass vaccination centres and communication of herd immunity benefits, our model predicted outright vaccine refusal in 29·4% (95% CI 28·6-30·2) of the French working-age population. Predicted hesitancy was highest for vaccines manufactured in China with 50% efficacy and a 1 in 10 000 risk of serious side-effects (vaccine acceptance 27·4% [26·8-28·0]), and lowest for a vaccine manufactured in the EU with 90% efficacy and a 1 in 100 000 risk of serious side-effects (vaccine acceptance 61·3% [60·5-62·1]).

INTERPRETATION

COVID-19 vaccine acceptance depends on the characteristics of new vaccines and the national vaccination strategy, among various other factors, in the working-age population in France.

FUNDING

French Public Health Agency (Santé Publique France).

摘要

背景

关于疫苗接种意愿的民意调查表明,全球范围内对新冠疫苗的犹豫情绪正在增加;然而,民意调查对于为特定新疫苗筹备大规模疫苗接种活动以及估计一个国家人口的接受程度的作用有限。因此,我们旨在评估疫苗特性、群体免疫信息以及全科医生(GP)的建议对法国具有代表性的工作年龄人群中疫苗犹豫情绪的影响。

方法

在这项调查实验中,2020年7月从一个在线调查研究小组中随机选取居住在法国、年龄在18 - 64岁且无新冠病毒感染史的成年人,按照性别、年龄、教育程度、家庭规模以及居住地区和区域进行分层,以代表法国人口。参与者完成一份关于其背景和与疫苗接种行为相关变量的在线问卷(包括过去的疫苗接种依从性、新冠重症的风险因素以及对新冠的认知和经历),然后根据全因子设计随机分配到三组中的一组,以接收关于群体免疫的不同信息(18 - 64岁成年人中超过50%必须接种疫苗[通过接种或感染];超过50%的成年人必须接种疫苗[通过接种或感染];或无群体免疫信息),并分配到关于全科医生疫苗接种建议的两组中的一组(全科医生建议接种或未表明意见)。参与者随后完成一系列八个离散选择任务,旨在根据假设的疫苗特性(效力[50%、80%、90%或100%]、严重副作用风险[万分之一或十万分之一]、生产地[欧盟、美国或中国]以及接种地点[全科医生诊所、当地药房或大规模疫苗接种中心])评估疫苗接受或拒绝情况。使用两部分模型对回答进行分析,以区分完全拒绝接种疫苗(无论疫苗特性如何,定义为在所有八个任务中都选择不接种)和疫苗犹豫(接受情况取决于疫苗特性)。

结果

从1942名工作年龄成年人中收集了调查回复,其中560人(28.8%)在所有八个任务中都选择不接种(完全拒绝接种疫苗),1382人(71.2%)并非如此。在我们的模型中,完全拒绝接种疫苗和疫苗犹豫都与女性性别、年龄(呈倒U形关系)、较低的教育水平、过去对推荐疫苗接种的依从性差以及未报告特定慢性病(即无高血压[对于疫苗犹豫]或除高血压外无其他慢性病[对于完全拒绝接种疫苗])显著相关。完全拒绝接种疫苗还与对新冠严重程度的较低感知相关,而当传达群体免疫益处时以及在在职与非在职个体中,以及有新冠经历(有症状或认识新冠患者)的人群中,疫苗犹豫程度较低。对于一个涉及大规模疫苗接种中心并传达群体免疫益处的大规模疫苗接种活动,我们的模型预测法国工作年龄人群中有29.4%(95%CI 28.6 - 30.2)会完全拒绝接种疫苗。对于效力为50%且严重副作用风险为万分之一的中国生产的疫苗,预测的犹豫程度最高(疫苗接受率27.4%[26.8 - 28.0]),而对于效力为90%且严重副作用风险为十万分之一的欧盟生产的疫苗,预测的犹豫程度最低(疫苗接受率61.3%[60.5 - 62.1])。

解读

在法国的工作年龄人群中,新冠疫苗的接受情况取决于新疫苗的特性和国家疫苗接种策略以及其他各种因素。

资金来源

法国公共卫生署(Santé Publique France)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a1a/7864787/7ae88ca5b75b/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验