Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
Department of Health Services Research, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Chest. 2021 Jul;160(1):330-340. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.041. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
Lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces lung cancer mortality, but it also carries a range of risks. Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process of engaging patients in their health care decisions and is a vital component of LCS.
What is the quality of SDM among patients recently assessed for LCS?
Cross-sectional study of screened patients recruited from two academic tertiary care centers in the South Central Region of the United States. Self-reported surveys assessed patient demographics, values related to outcomes of LCS, knowledge, SDM components including receipt of educational materials, and decisional conflict.
Recently screened patients (n = 266) possessed varied LCS knowledge, answering an average of 41.4% of questions correctly. Patients valued finding cancer early over concerns about harms. Patients indicated that LCS benefits were presented to them by a health care provider far more often than harms (68.3% vs 20.8%, respectively), and 30.7% reported they received educational materials about LCS during the screening process. One-third of patients had some decisional conflict (33.6%) related to their screening decisions, whereas most patients (86.6%) noted that they were involved in the screening decision as much as they wanted. In multivariate models, non-White race and having less education were related to lower knowledge scores. Non-White patients and former smokers were more likely to be conflicted about the screening decision. Most patients (n = 227 [85.3%]) indicated that a health care provider had discussed smoking cessation or abstinence with them.
Among recently screened patients, the quality of decision-making about LCS is highly variable. The low use of educational materials including decision aids and imbalance of conveying benefit vs risk information to patients is concerning. A structured approach using decision aids may assist with providing a balanced presentation of information and may improve the quality of SDM.
肺癌筛查(LCS)可降低肺癌死亡率,但也存在一系列风险。共同决策(SDM)是让患者参与其医疗保健决策的过程,是 LCS 的重要组成部分。
最近接受 LCS 评估的患者的 SDM 质量如何?
这是一项在美国中南部地区的两个学术三级保健中心招募的筛查患者的横断面研究。自我报告的调查评估了患者的人口统计学特征、与 LCS 结果相关的价值观、知识、包括接受教育材料在内的 SDM 组成部分以及决策冲突。
最近接受筛查的患者(n=266)具有不同的 LCS 知识,平均正确回答了 41.4%的问题。患者重视早期发现癌症,而不是担心危害。患者表示,医疗保健提供者向他们介绍 LCS 的益处远远多于危害(分别为 68.3%和 20.8%),30.7%的患者报告在筛查过程中收到了有关 LCS 的教育材料。三分之一的患者在筛查决策中存在一定程度的决策冲突(33.6%),而大多数患者(86.6%)表示他们参与了筛查决策。在多变量模型中,非白种人和受教育程度较低与较低的知识得分相关。非白种人和前吸烟者更有可能对筛查决策感到冲突。大多数患者(n=227 [85.3%])表示,医疗保健提供者曾与他们讨论过戒烟或戒断。
在最近接受筛查的患者中,关于 LCS 的决策质量差异很大。低使用教育材料,包括决策辅助工具,以及向患者传达益处与风险信息的不平衡,令人担忧。使用决策辅助工具的结构化方法可能有助于提供信息的平衡呈现,并可能提高 SDM 的质量。