Suppr超能文献

评估用于捕捉临床实践复杂性的HexCom模型的表面效度:一项德尔菲研究。

Assessing Face Validity of the HexCom Model for Capturing Complexity in Clinical Practice: A Delphi Study.

作者信息

Busquet-Duran Xavier, Jiménez-Zafra Eva Maria, Tura-Poma Magda, Bosch-de la Rosa Olga, Moragas-Roca Anna, Martin-Moreno Susana, Martínez-Losada Emilio, Crespo-Ramírez Silvia, Lestón-Lado Lola, Salamero-Tura Núria, Llobera-Estrany Joana, Oriol-Peregrina Núria, Moreno-Gabriel Eduard, Manresa-Domínguez Josep Maria, Torán-Monserrat Pere

机构信息

Home Care Program, Granollers Support Team (PADES), Vallès Oriental Primary Care Service, Catalan Health Institute, 08520 Granollers, Spain.

Multidisciplinary Research Group on Health and Society (GREMSAS), (2017 SGR 917), 08007 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 4;9(2):165. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020165.

Abstract

Capturing complexity is both a conceptual and a practical challenge in palliative care. The HexCom model has proved to be an instrument with strong reliability and to be valid for describing the needs and strengths of patients in home care. In order to explore whether it is also perceived to be helpful in enhancing coordinated and patient-centred care at a practical level, a methodological study was carried out to assess the face validity of the model. In particular, a Delphi method involving a group of 14 experts representing the full spectrum of healthcare professionals involved in palliative care was carried out. The results show that there is a high level of agreement, with a content validity index-item greater than 0.92 both with regard to the complexity model and the HexCom-Red, HexCom-Basic, and the HexCom-Clin instruments, and higher than 0.85 regarding the HexCom-Figure and the HexCom-Patient instruments. This consensus confirms that the HexCom model and the different instruments that are derived from it are valued as useful tools for a broad range of healthcare professional in coordinately capturing complexity in healthcare practice.

摘要

在姑息治疗中,把握复杂性既是一个概念上的挑战,也是一个实际操作上的挑战。HexCom模型已被证明是一种可靠性很强的工具,并且在描述居家护理患者的需求和优势方面是有效的。为了探究该模型在实际层面是否也被认为有助于加强协调一致且以患者为中心的护理,开展了一项方法学研究来评估该模型的表面效度。具体而言,采用了德尔菲法,涉及一组14名代表姑息治疗领域所有医疗专业人员的专家。结果表明,达成了高度共识,复杂性模型、HexCom-Red、HexCom-Basic和HexCom-Clin工具的内容效度指数项均大于0.92,HexCom-Figure和HexCom-Patient工具的内容效度指数项高于0.85。这一共识证实,HexCom模型及其衍生出的不同工具被视为有用的工具,可帮助广大医疗专业人员在医疗实践中协调一致地把握复杂性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ba/7913893/918a2d57bdc1/healthcare-09-00165-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing Face Validity of the HexCom Model for Capturing Complexity in Clinical Practice: A Delphi Study.
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 4;9(2):165. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020165.
2
Intra-rater reliability and feasibility of the HexCom advanced disease complexity assessment model.
Aten Primaria. 2022 Jun;54(6):102343. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2022.102343. Epub 2022 May 9.
4
Describing Complexity in Palliative Home Care Through HexCom: A Cross-Sectional, Multicenter Study.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Mar 19;13:297-308. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S240835. eCollection 2020.
6
[Care complexity and place of death in palliative home care].
Gac Sanit. 2022 Dec 15;37:102266. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2022.102266. eCollection 2023.
7
Gender and Observed Complexity in Palliative Home Care: A Prospective Multicentre Study Using the HexCom Model.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 23;18(23):12307. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312307.
8
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
9
A systematic review of classifications systems to determine complexity of patient care needs in palliative care.
Palliat Med. 2021 Apr;35(4):636-650. doi: 10.1177/0269216321996983. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
10
Systemic strengths and needs in palliative home care: exploring complexity.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2024 Jan;224(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rceng.2023.12.004. Epub 2023 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Describing Complexity in Palliative Home Care Through HexCom: A Cross-Sectional, Multicenter Study.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Mar 19;13:297-308. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S240835. eCollection 2020.
2
The impact of a personalised action plan delivered at discharge to patients with COPD on readmissions: a pilot study.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Dec;34(4):909-918. doi: 10.1111/scs.12798. Epub 2019 Dec 21.
3
The relation between self-efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and caregiver burden.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Sep;34(3):754-761. doi: 10.1111/scs.12780. Epub 2019 Oct 27.
4
Instruments to evaluate complexity in end-of-life care.
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2018 Dec;12(4):480-488. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000403.
5
What is palliative care? Perceptions of healthcare professionals.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2019 Mar;33(1):77-84. doi: 10.1111/scs.12603. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
6
A framework for complexity in palliative care: A qualitative study with patients, family carers and professionals.
Palliat Med. 2018 Jun;32(6):1078-1090. doi: 10.1177/0269216318757622. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
7
What does 'complex' mean in palliative care? Triangulating qualitative findings from 3 settings.
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Jan 4;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0259-z.
8
[Find your 1%: prevalence and mortality of a community cohort of people with advanced chronic disease and palliative needs].
Aten Primaria. 2019 Feb;51(2):71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
9
A scoping review and thematic classification of patient complexity: offering a unifying framework.
J Comorb. 2012 Oct 10;2:1-9. doi: 10.15256/joc.2012.2.15. eCollection 2012.
10
Predictive model of complexity in early palliative care: a cohort of advanced cancer patients (PALCOM study).
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Jan;26(1):241-249. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3840-3. Epub 2017 Aug 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验