Suppr超能文献

一项关于确定姑息治疗中患者护理需求复杂性的分类系统的系统评价。

A systematic review of classifications systems to determine complexity of patient care needs in palliative care.

作者信息

Grant Matthew, de Graaf Everlien, Teunissen Saskia

机构信息

Centre of Expertise Palliative Care Utrecht, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2021 Apr;35(4):636-650. doi: 10.1177/0269216321996983. Epub 2021 Mar 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Providing the right care for each individual patient is a key element of quality palliative care. Complexity is a relatively new concept, defined as the nature of patients' situations and the extent of resulting needs. Classifying patients according to the complexity of their care needs can guide integration of services, anticipatory discussions, health service planning, resource management and determination of needs for specialist or general palliative care. However, there is no consistent approach to interpreting and classifying complexity of patient needs.

AIM

The aim of this article is to identify and describe classification systems for complexity of patient care needs in palliative care.

DESIGN

Narrative systematic review (PROSPERO registration number CRD42020182102).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO databases were searched without time limitations. Articles were included that described classification systems for complexity of care requirements in populations with palliative care needs.

RESULTS

In total, 4301 records were screened, with nine articles identified reporting the use of patient classification systems in populations with palliative care needs. These articles included the use of six classification systems: HexCom, Perroca Scale, AN-SNAP, Hui Major Criteria, IDC-Pal and PALCOM. These systems were heterogenous in the manner they determined complexity of care needs. The HexCom and IDC-Pal systems contained items that covered all domains of complexity as described by Hodiamont; personal, social support, health care team and environment.

CONCLUSION

Although six classification systems have been developed, they access differing aspects of care needs and their application has been limited. The HexCOM and IDC-Pal systems offer the broadest determinations of complexity from an individual perspective. Further research is needed to apply these systems to populations external to those in which they were developed, and to appreciate how they may integrate with, and impact, clinical care.

摘要

背景

为每位患者提供恰当的护理是优质姑息治疗的关键要素。复杂性是一个相对较新的概念,被定义为患者情况的本质以及由此产生的需求程度。根据患者护理需求的复杂性对患者进行分类,可以指导服务整合、前瞻性讨论、卫生服务规划、资源管理以及确定专科或一般姑息治疗的需求。然而,在解释和分类患者需求的复杂性方面,尚无一致的方法。

目的

本文的目的是识别和描述姑息治疗中患者护理需求复杂性的分类系统。

设计

叙述性系统评价(PROSPERO注册号CRD42020182102)。

数据来源

对MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL和PsychINFO数据库进行无时间限制的检索。纳入的文章描述了姑息治疗需求人群护理需求复杂性的分类系统。

结果

共筛选了4301条记录,确定有9篇文章报告了在姑息治疗需求人群中使用患者分类系统的情况。这些文章包括使用六种分类系统:HexCom、佩罗卡量表、AN-SNAP、许氏主要标准、IDC-Pal和PALCOM。这些系统在确定护理需求复杂性的方式上存在差异。HexCom和IDC-Pal系统包含的项目涵盖了霍迪亚蒙特所描述的复杂性的所有领域;个人、社会支持、医疗团队和环境。

结论

虽然已经开发了六种分类系统,但它们涉及护理需求的不同方面,并且其应用有限。HexCOM和IDC-Pal系统从个体角度对复杂性提供了最广泛的判定。需要进一步研究将这些系统应用于其开发人群之外的人群,并了解它们如何与临床护理整合以及对临床护理产生何种影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e22a/8022082/030f29d0a23f/10.1177_0269216321996983-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验