• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国有限新冠疫苗供应的优化分配

Optimal Allocation of the Limited COVID-19 Vaccine Supply in South Korea.

作者信息

Shim Eunha

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 4;10(4):591. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040591.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10040591
PMID:33557344
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7914460/
Abstract

Initial supply of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine may be limited, necessitating its effective use. Herein, an age-structured model of COVID-19 spread in South Korea is parameterized to understand the epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19. The model determines optimal vaccine allocation for minimizing infections, deaths, and years of life lost while accounting for population factors, such as country-specific age distribution and contact structure, and various levels of vaccine efficacy. A transmission-blocking vaccine should be prioritized in adults aged 20-49 years and those older than 50 years to minimize the cumulative incidence and mortality, respectively. A strategy to minimize years of life lost involves the vaccination of adults aged 40-69 years, reflecting the relatively high case-fatality rates and years of life lost in this age group. An incidence-minimizing vaccination strategy is highly sensitive to vaccine efficacy, and vaccines with lower efficacy should be administered to teenagers and adults aged 50-59 years. Consideration of age-specific contact rates and vaccine efficacy is critical to optimize vaccine allocation. New recommendations for COVID-19 vaccines under consideration by the Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are mainly based on a mortality-minimizing allocation strategy.

摘要

冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗的初始供应可能有限,因此必须有效使用。在此,我们对韩国COVID-19传播的年龄结构模型进行参数化,以了解COVID-19的流行病学特征。该模型确定了最佳疫苗分配方案,以在考虑特定国家年龄分布和接触结构等人口因素以及不同水平疫苗效力的情况下,尽量减少感染、死亡和生命年损失。为尽量减少累积发病率和死亡率,应优先为20至49岁的成年人以及50岁以上的人群接种阻断传播的疫苗。一种尽量减少生命年损失的策略涉及为40至69岁的成年人接种疫苗,这反映了该年龄组相对较高的病死率和生命年损失。一种将发病率降至最低的疫苗接种策略对疫苗效力高度敏感,效力较低的疫苗应接种给青少年和50至59岁的成年人。考虑特定年龄的接触率和疫苗效力对于优化疫苗分配至关重要。韩国疾病控制与预防中心正在考虑的COVID-19疫苗新建议主要基于一种将死亡率降至最低的分配策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/7914460/12bfc6b1dd70/jcm-10-00591-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/7914460/7d6cc20e3edb/jcm-10-00591-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/7914460/23edc1def4f1/jcm-10-00591-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/7914460/dbb4796f7f57/jcm-10-00591-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/7914460/be1d3d4378ac/jcm-10-00591-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/7914460/2a2c986504cb/jcm-10-00591-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/7914460/c760d210be19/jcm-10-00591-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/7914460/12bfc6b1dd70/jcm-10-00591-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/7914460/7d6cc20e3edb/jcm-10-00591-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/7914460/23edc1def4f1/jcm-10-00591-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/7914460/dbb4796f7f57/jcm-10-00591-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/7914460/be1d3d4378ac/jcm-10-00591-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/7914460/2a2c986504cb/jcm-10-00591-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/7914460/c760d210be19/jcm-10-00591-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/7914460/12bfc6b1dd70/jcm-10-00591-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimal Allocation of the Limited COVID-19 Vaccine Supply in South Korea.韩国有限新冠疫苗供应的优化分配
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 4;10(4):591. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040591.
2
Vaccine Effects on Susceptibility and Symptomatology Can Change the Optimal Allocation of COVID-19 Vaccines: South Korea as an Example.疫苗对易感性和症状学的影响会改变新冠疫苗的最佳分配方式:以韩国为例
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 25;10(13):2813. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132813.
3
Projecting the Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Variants and the Vaccination Program on the Fourth Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in South Korea.预测新冠病毒变异株和疫苗接种计划对韩国第四波新冠疫情的影响
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 16;18(14):7578. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147578.
4
Comparing COVID-19 vaccine allocation strategies in India: A mathematical modelling study.比较印度的 COVID-19 疫苗分配策略:一项数学建模研究。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;103:431-438. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.12.075. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
5
Dynamic prioritization of COVID-19 vaccines when social distancing is limited for essential workers.在社交距离对基本工人有限时,对 COVID-19 疫苗进行动态优先级排序。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 20;118(16). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2025786118.
6
Assessing Vaccination Prioritization Strategies for COVID-19 in South Africa Based on Age-Specific Compartment Model.基于特定年龄组 compartment 模型评估南非 COVID-19 疫苗接种优先级策略。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 15;10:876551. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.876551. eCollection 2022.
7
COVID-19 Vaccine Priority Strategy Using a Heterogenous Transmission Model Based on Maximum Likelihood Estimation in the Republic of Korea.韩国使用基于最大似然估计的异质传播模型的 COVID-19 疫苗优先接种策略。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 15;18(12):6469. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126469.
8
Dynamic Prioritization of COVID-19 Vaccines When Social Distancing is Limited for Essential Workers.当基本工作者的社交距离限制有限时,对2019冠状病毒病疫苗进行动态优先排序。
medRxiv. 2020 Dec 17:2020.09.22.20199174. doi: 10.1101/2020.09.22.20199174.
9
Optimizing Spatio-Temporal Allocation of the COVID-19 Vaccine Under Different Epidemiological Landscapes.优化 COVID-19 疫苗在不同流行景观下的时空分配。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;10:921855. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.921855. eCollection 2022.
10
Delay-Adjusted Age-Specific COVID-19 Case Fatality Rates in a High Testing Setting: South Korea, February 2020 to February 2021.高检测环境下调整年龄别延迟的 COVID-19 病死率:韩国,2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 2 月。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 11;18(10):5053. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105053.

引用本文的文献

1
A network-based model to assess vaccination strategies for the COVID-19 pandemic by using Bayesian optimization.一种基于网络的模型,用于通过贝叶斯优化评估针对新冠疫情的疫苗接种策略。
Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2024 Apr;181. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114695. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
2
Optimization Modeling for Pandemic Vaccine Supply Chain Management: A Review and Future Research Opportunities.大流行疫苗供应链管理的优化建模:综述与未来研究机会
Nav Res Logist. 2024 Oct;71(7):976-1016. doi: 10.1002/nav.22181. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
3
Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review of mathematical vaccine prioritization models.

本文引用的文献

1
Vaccine optimization for COVID-19: Who to vaccinate first?2019冠状病毒病疫苗优化:优先接种对象为谁?
Sci Adv. 2021 Feb 3;7(6). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf1374. Print 2020 Feb.
2
Model-informed COVID-19 vaccine prioritization strategies by age and serostatus.基于模型的 COVID-19 疫苗优先接种策略,按年龄和血清学状态分层。
Science. 2021 Feb 26;371(6532):916-921. doi: 10.1126/science.abe6959. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
3
Robust estimates of the true (population) infection rate for COVID-19: a backcasting approach.对新型冠状病毒肺炎真实(总体)感染率的稳健估计:一种回溯法。
从新冠疫情中学习:数学疫苗优先排序模型的系统综述
Infect Dis Model. 2024 May 15;9(4):1057-1080. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2024.05.005. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Vaccination strategies impact the probability of outbreak extinction: A case study of COVID-19 transmission.疫苗接种策略影响疫情爆发终止的概率:以新冠病毒传播为例的研究
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 15;10(6):e28042. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28042. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
5
Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review of mathematical vaccine prioritization models.从新冠疫情中学习:数学疫苗优先级模型的系统综述
medRxiv. 2024 Mar 7:2024.03.04.24303726. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.04.24303726.
6
An Epidemic Model with Infection Age and Vaccination Age Structure.一个具有感染年龄和接种年龄结构的流行病模型。
Infect Dis Rep. 2024 Jan 10;16(1):35-64. doi: 10.3390/idr16010004.
7
Predictive models for health outcomes due to SARS-CoV-2, including the effect of vaccination: a systematic review.预测 SARS-CoV-2 导致的健康结果的模型,包括疫苗接种的效果:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 16;13(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02411-1.
8
Assessing the cost-effectiveness of annual COVID-19 booster vaccination in South Korea using a transmission dynamic model.利用传染病传播动力学模型评估韩国每年进行 COVID-19 加强针接种的成本效益。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 23;11:1280412. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1280412. eCollection 2023.
9
Modeling vaccination strategies with limited early COVID-19 vaccine access in low- and middle-income countries: A case study of Thailand.低收入和中等收入国家早期新冠疫苗供应有限情况下的疫苗接种策略建模:以泰国为例
Infect Dis Model. 2023 Nov 15;8(4):1177-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2023.11.003. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Strategies and Trends in COVID-19 Vaccination Delivery: What We Learn and What We May Use for the Future.2019冠状病毒病疫苗接种策略与趋势:我们学到了什么以及未来可能会用到什么。
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Sep 16;11(9):1496. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11091496.
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Nov 18;7(11):200909. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200909. eCollection 2020 Nov.
4
Comparing COVID-19 vaccine allocation strategies in India: A mathematical modelling study.比较印度的 COVID-19 疫苗分配策略:一项数学建模研究。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;103:431-438. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.12.075. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
5
Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine.mRNA-1273 新型冠状病毒疫苗的有效性和安全性。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
6
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' Interim Recommendation for Allocating Initial Supplies of COVID-19 Vaccine - United States, 2020.免疫实践咨询委员会关于分配 COVID-19 疫苗初始供应的临时建议-美国,2020 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Dec 11;69(49):1857-1859. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6949e1.
7
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.BNT162b2 mRNA 新冠病毒疫苗的安全性和有效性。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
8
COVID-19 vaccines: no time for complacency.新冠疫苗:不能有丝毫自满。
Lancet. 2020 Nov 21;396(10263):1607. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32472-7.
9
A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine.一项针对 COVID-19 疫苗潜在接受度的全球调查。
Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):225-228. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1124-9. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
10
Waning Antibody Responses in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection.无症状和有症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染的抗体反应减弱。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;27(1):327-9. doi: 10.3201/eid2701.203515. Epub 2020 Oct 13.