Suppr超能文献

间充质干细胞及其产物在肺部疾病中的治疗潜力——静脉注射与吸入

Therapeutic Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Products in Lung Diseases-Intravenous Administration versus Inhalation.

作者信息

Fröhlich Eleonore

机构信息

Center for Medical Research, Medical University of Graz, Stiftingtalstr 24, 8010 Graz, Austria.

Research Center Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH, Inffeldgasse 13, 8010 Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Pharmaceutics. 2021 Feb 7;13(2):232. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13020232.

Abstract

The number of publications studying the therapeutic use of stem cells has steadily increased since 2000. Compared to other applications, there has been little interest in the evaluation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and MSC-derived products (mostly extracellular vesicles) for the treatment of respiratory diseases. Due to the lack of efficient treatments for acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the action of MSCs has also been studied. This review describes mode of action and use of MSCs and MSC-derived products in the treatment of lung diseases including the respective advantages and limitations of the products. Further, issues related to standardized production are addressed. Administration by inhalation of MSCs, compared to intravenous injection, could decrease cell damage by shear stress, eliminate the barrier to reach target cells in the alveoli, prevent thrombus formation in the pulmonary vasculature and retention in filter for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. There is more feasible to deliver extracellular vesicles than MSCs with inhalers, offering the advantage of non-invasive and repeated administration by the patient. Major obstacles for comparison of results are heterogeneity of the products, differences in the treatment protocols and small study cohorts.

摘要

自2000年以来,研究干细胞治疗用途的出版物数量稳步增加。与其他应用相比,对间充质干细胞(MSCs)和MSC衍生产品(主要是细胞外囊泡)用于治疗呼吸系统疾病的评估兴趣不大。由于缺乏针对由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染引起的急性呼吸窘迫综合征的有效治疗方法,人们也对MSCs的作用进行了研究。本综述描述了MSCs和MSC衍生产品在治疗肺部疾病中的作用方式和用途,包括产品各自的优点和局限性。此外,还讨论了与标准化生产相关的问题。与静脉注射相比,通过吸入方式给予MSCs可以减少剪切应力对细胞的损伤,消除到达肺泡中靶细胞的障碍,防止肺血管系统中血栓形成以及在体外膜肺氧合过滤器中的滞留。使用吸入器递送细胞外囊泡比递送MSCs更可行,具有患者非侵入性和重复给药优势。结果比较的主要障碍是产品的异质性、治疗方案的差异以及研究队列规模较小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cea/7915745/b73b33f4989f/pharmaceutics-13-00232-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验