• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ALPHA 项目:建立共识和优先级,以解决狼疮诊断、护理、治疗和研究方面的主要挑战的全球社区建议。

The ALPHA Project: Establishing consensus and prioritisation of global community recommendations to address major challenges in lupus diagnosis, care, treatment and research.

机构信息

Research, Lupus Foundation of America Inc, Washington, District of Columbia, USA

Faegre Drinker Consulting, Faegre Drinker Biddle and Reath LLP, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Lupus Sci Med. 2021 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2020-000433.

DOI:10.1136/lupus-2020-000433
PMID:33563729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7875256/
Abstract

The Addressing Lupus Pillars for Health Advancement (ALPHA) Project is a global consensus effort to identify, prioritise and address top barriers in lupus impacting diagnosis, care, treatment and research. To conduct this process, the ALPHA Project convened a multistakeholder Global Advisory Committee (GAC) of lupus experts and collected input from global audiences, including patients. In phase I, the ALPHA Project used expert interviews and a global survey of lupus experts to identify and categorise barriers into three overarching pillars: drug development, clinical care and access to care. In phase II, reported here, the GAC developed recommended actionable solutions to address these previously identified barriers through an in-person stakeholder meeting, followed by a two-round scoring process. Recommendations were assessed for feasibility, impact and timeline for implementation (FIT), where potential FIT component values were between 1 and 3 and total scores were between 3 and 9. Higher scores represented higher achievability based on the composite of the three criteria. Simplifying and standardising outcomes measures, including steroid sparing as an outcome (drug development) and defining the lupus spectrum (clinical care) ranked as the highest two priority solutions during the GAC meeting and received high FIT scores (7.67 and 7.44, respectively). Leveraging social media (access to care) received the highest FIT score across all pillars (7.86). Cross-cutting themes of many solutions include leveraging digital technology and applying specific considerations for special populations, including paediatrics. Implementing the recommendations to address key barriers to drug development, clinical care and access to care is essential to improving the quality of life of adults and children with lupus. Multistakeholder collaboration and guidance across existing efforts globally is warranted.

摘要

ALPHA 项目是一个全球性的共识行动,旨在确定、优先考虑和解决影响狼疮诊断、护理、治疗和研究的主要障碍。为了进行这一过程,ALPHA 项目召集了一个由狼疮专家组成的多方利益相关者全球顾问委员会(GAC),并从包括患者在内的全球受众那里收集了意见。在第一阶段,ALPHA 项目使用专家访谈和对全球狼疮专家的调查,将障碍分为三个总体支柱:药物开发、临床护理和获得护理。在第二阶段,这里报告的是,GAC 通过现场利益相关者会议以及两轮评分过程,制定了针对这些先前确定的障碍的建议可操作解决方案。建议根据可行性、影响和实施时间表(FIT)进行评估,潜在的 FIT 组件值在 1 到 3 之间,总分数在 3 到 9 之间。根据这三个标准的综合得分,分数越高表示可实现性越高。简化和标准化结果衡量标准,包括将类固醇节省作为结果(药物开发)和定义狼疮谱(临床护理),在 GAC 会议期间被列为两个最高优先级解决方案,并获得了较高的 FIT 分数(分别为 7.67 和 7.44)。利用社交媒体(获得护理)在所有支柱中获得了最高的 FIT 分数(7.86)。许多解决方案的交叉主题包括利用数字技术和针对特殊人群(包括儿科)应用特定考虑因素。实施这些建议以解决药物开发、临床护理和获得护理的关键障碍,对于提高成人和儿童狼疮患者的生活质量至关重要。需要在全球范围内进行多方利益相关者的合作和指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd79/7875256/5caaf1e00d8c/lupus-2020-000433f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd79/7875256/5caaf1e00d8c/lupus-2020-000433f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd79/7875256/5caaf1e00d8c/lupus-2020-000433f01.jpg

相似文献

1
The ALPHA Project: Establishing consensus and prioritisation of global community recommendations to address major challenges in lupus diagnosis, care, treatment and research.ALPHA 项目:建立共识和优先级,以解决狼疮诊断、护理、治疗和研究方面的主要挑战的全球社区建议。
Lupus Sci Med. 2021 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2020-000433.
2
Global consensus building and prioritisation of fundamental lupus challenges: the ALPHA project.全球狼疮基本挑战的共识构建与优先排序:ALPHA项目
Lupus Sci Med. 2019 Jul 19;6(1):e000342. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2019-000342. eCollection 2019.
3
Establishing Consensus Understanding of the Barriers to Drug Development in Lupus.确立狼疮药物研发障碍的共识理解
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Sep;54(5):1159-1165. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00134-2. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
4
Meeting report: the ALPHA project: a stakeholder meeting on lupus clinical trial outcome measures and the patient perspective.会议报告:ALPHA 项目:关于狼疮临床试验结局指标和患者视角的利益相关者会议。
Lupus Sci Med. 2023 Feb;10(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2023-000901. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
5
Towards development of treat to target (T2T) in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: PReS-endorsed overarching principles and points-to-consider from an international task force.迈向儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮的靶向治疗(T2T):来自一个国际工作组的 PReS 认可的总体原则和要点考虑。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Jun;82(6):788-798. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223328. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
6
The First National Pain Medicine Summit--final summary report.第一届全国疼痛医学峰会——最终总结报告。
Pain Med. 2010 Oct;11(10):1447-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00961.x.
7
European evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: the SHARE initiative.欧洲基于证据的儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮诊断和治疗推荐:SHARE 倡议。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Nov;76(11):1788-1796. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210960. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
8
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
9
Lupus spectrum ambiguity has long-term negative implications for patients.狼疮谱不确定性对患者有长期的负面影响。
Lupus Sci Med. 2023 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000856. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
10
Moving low value care lists into action: prioritizing candidate health technologies for reassessment using administrative data.将低价值医疗清单付诸行动:利用行政数据对候选健康技术进行重新评估的优先级排序。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 15;18(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3459-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology and factors associated with osteoporosis, falls and fractures in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease: a scoping review.慢性炎症性风湿性疾病患者骨质疏松症、跌倒和骨折的流行病学及相关因素:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 28;15(7):e096226. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096226.
2
Domains for inclusion in a novel Treatment Response Measure for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (TRM-SLE): results of a modified Delphi study.纳入系统性红斑狼疮新型治疗反应测量指标(TRM-SLE)的领域:一项改良德尔菲研究的结果
Lupus Sci Med. 2025 May 6;12(1):e001484. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2024-001484.
3
Understanding the impact of delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

本文引用的文献

1
Global consensus building and prioritisation of fundamental lupus challenges: the ALPHA project.全球狼疮基本挑战的共识构建与优先排序:ALPHA项目
Lupus Sci Med. 2019 Jul 19;6(1):e000342. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2019-000342. eCollection 2019.
2
SLE mortality remains disproportionately high, despite improvements over the last decade.尽管在过去十年中有所改善,但系统性红斑狼疮的死亡率仍然高得不成比例。
Lupus. 2018 Sep;27(10):1577-1581. doi: 10.1177/0961203318786436. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
3
Risk of adverse events from different drugs for SLE: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
了解系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)延迟诊断和误诊的影响。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Nov;13(11):4819-4823. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1177_24. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
4
Meeting report: the ALPHA project: a stakeholder meeting on lupus clinical trial outcome measures and the patient perspective.会议报告:ALPHA 项目:关于狼疮临床试验结局指标和患者视角的利益相关者会议。
Lupus Sci Med. 2023 Feb;10(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2023-000901. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
5
Lupus spectrum ambiguity has long-term negative implications for patients.狼疮谱不确定性对患者有长期的负面影响。
Lupus Sci Med. 2023 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000856. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
6
Improving access to SLE therapies in low and middle-income countries.改善中低收入国家 SLE 治疗方法的可及性。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Mar 29;62(Suppl 1):i30-i35. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac530.
7
"There's so much to be done": a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.“有太多的事情要做”:一项阐明儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮研究重点的定性研究。
Lupus Sci Med. 2022 Mar;9(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000659.
8
Importance of collaboration of dermatology and rheumatology to advance the field for lupus and dermatomyositis.皮肤科与风湿病学合作对推动狼疮和皮肌炎领域发展的重要性。
Int J Womens Dermatol. 2021 Sep 24;7(5Part A):583-587. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2021.09.002. eCollection 2021 Dec.
系统性红斑狼疮不同药物不良事件的风险:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Lupus Sci Med. 2018 Mar 9;5(1):e000253. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2017-000253. eCollection 2018.
4
It hasn't gone away: the problem of glucocorticoid use in lupus remains.它并未消失:狼疮中糖皮质激素的使用问题依然存在。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Apr 1;56(suppl_1):i114-i122. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew406.
5
The global burden of SLE: prevalence, health disparities and socioeconomic impact.系统性红斑狼疮的全球负担:患病率、健康差异和社会经济影响。
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016 Oct;12(10):605-20. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.137. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
6
Patients with overlap autoimmune disease differ from those with 'pure' disease.重叠性自身免疫病患者与“单纯”疾病患者不同。
Lupus Sci Med. 2015 May 6;2(1):e000084. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2015-000084. eCollection 2015.
7
Connective tissue diseases: Is SLE many single-organ diseases or an overlapping spectrum?
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015 Jul;11(7):385-6. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.61. Epub 2015 May 5.
8
Disparities in lupus care and outcomes.狼疮治疗与预后的差异。
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2009 Mar;21(2):102-9. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e328323daad.
9
Medicaid and access to care among persons with systemic lupus erythematosus.医疗补助与系统性红斑狼疮患者的医疗服务可及性
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 May 15;57(4):601-7. doi: 10.1002/art.22671.
10
Autoantibodies and overlap syndromes in autoimmune rheumatic disease.自身免疫性风湿性疾病中的自身抗体与重叠综合征。
J Clin Pathol. 2001 May;54(5):340-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.5.340.