• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典 COPD 患者中关键性吸入器技术错误:一项分析视频记录演示的横断面研究。

Critical inhaler technique errors in Swedish patients with COPD: a cross-sectional study analysing video-recorded demonstrations.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/Region Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden.

出版信息

NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2021 Feb 9;31(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41533-021-00218-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41533-021-00218-y
PMID:33563979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7873256/
Abstract

A correct use of inhaler devices is essential in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment. Critical errors were studied by analysing 659 video-recorded demonstrations of inhaler technique from 364 COPD patients using six different inhaler device models. The majority of the included patients used two (55%) or more (20%) device models. Overall, 66% of the patients made ≥1 critical error with at least one device model. The corresponding numbers for patients using 1, 2 and ≥3 device models were 43%, 70% and 86%, respectively. The only factor associated with making ≥1 critical error was simultaneous use of two (adjusted odds ratios (aOR) 3.17, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.81, 5.64) or three or more (aOR 8.97, 95% CI 3.93, 22.1) device models. In conclusion, the proportion of patients making critical errors in inhaler technique was substantial, particularly in those using several different device models. To obtain optimal COPD treatment, it is important to assess a patient's inhaler technique and to minimise the number of inhaler device models.

摘要

正确使用吸入器装置对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的治疗至关重要。通过分析 364 名 COPD 患者使用六种不同吸入器装置模型进行的 659 次吸入器技术视频记录演示,研究了关键错误。大多数纳入的患者使用了两种(55%)或更多(20%)装置模型。总体而言,66%的患者在至少一种装置模型上犯了≥1 个关键错误。使用 1、2 和≥3 种装置模型的患者的相应数字分别为 43%、70%和 86%。唯一与犯≥1 个关键错误相关的因素是同时使用两种(调整后的优势比[aOR]3.17,95%置信区间[95%CI]1.81,5.64)或三种或更多(aOR 8.97,95%CI 3.93,22.1)装置模型。总之,在吸入器技术方面犯关键错误的患者比例相当大,特别是在使用多种不同装置模型的患者中。为了获得最佳的 COPD 治疗效果,评估患者的吸入器技术并尽量减少吸入器装置模型的数量非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a39e/7873256/735a5f2e2450/41533_2021_218_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a39e/7873256/8be29c0262a9/41533_2021_218_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a39e/7873256/735a5f2e2450/41533_2021_218_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a39e/7873256/8be29c0262a9/41533_2021_218_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a39e/7873256/735a5f2e2450/41533_2021_218_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Critical inhaler technique errors in Swedish patients with COPD: a cross-sectional study analysing video-recorded demonstrations.瑞典 COPD 患者中关键性吸入器技术错误:一项分析视频记录演示的横断面研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2021 Feb 9;31(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41533-021-00218-y.
2
COPD: misuse of inhaler devices in clinical practice.COPD:临床实践中吸入器装置的误用。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 May 30;14:1209-1217. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S178040. eCollection 2019.
3
Changes in critical inhaler technique errors in inhaled COPD treatment - A one-year follow-up study in Sweden.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)吸入治疗中关键吸入器技术错误的变化——瑞典的一项为期一年的随访研究
Respir Med. 2022 Jun;197:106849. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106849. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
4
Inhaler devices in asthma and COPD patients - a prospective cross-sectional study on inhaler preferences and error rates.哮喘和 COPD 患者的吸入器设备 - 关于吸入器偏好和错误率的前瞻性横断面研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Aug 20;20(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01246-z.
5
Inhaler devices in asthma and COPD--an assessment of inhaler technique and patient preferences.哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的吸入装置——吸入技术及患者偏好评估
Respir Med. 2014 Jul;108(7):968-75. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 May 10.
6
The Relationship Between Clinical Trial Participation and Inhaler Technique Errors in Asthma and COPD Patients.哮喘和 COPD 患者参与临床试验与吸入器技术错误之间的关系。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Jun 2;15:1217-1224. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S249620. eCollection 2020.
7
Technical Evaluation of Soft Mist Inhaler Use in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.软雾吸入器在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的使用技术评估:一项横断面研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Jun 22;15:1471-1479. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S253338. eCollection 2020.
8
Predictors of incorrect inhalation technique in patients with asthma or COPD: a study using a validated videotaped scoring method.哮喘或 COPD 患者吸入技术不正确的预测因素:一项使用经过验证的录像评分方法的研究。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2010 Oct;23(5):323-8. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2009.0785.
9
Comparative Study of Inhaler Device Handling Technique and Risk Factors for Critical Inhaler Errors in Korean COPD Patients.韩国 COPD 患者吸入器装置使用技术比较研究及严重吸入器错误的危险因素。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Apr 19;16:1051-1059. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S303761. eCollection 2021.
10
Determinants of poor inhaler technique and poor therapy adherence in obstructive lung diseases: a cross-sectional study in community pharmacies.影响阻塞性肺部疾病患者吸入器使用技术和治疗依从性的因素:社区药房的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Aug;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000823.

引用本文的文献

1
Recalibrating Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Nebulizers versus Inhalers for Maintenance Therapy in COPD: Past as Prologue.重新校准慢性阻塞性肺疾病维持治疗中雾化器与吸入器的认知和态度:以史为鉴。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Nov 28;19:2571-2586. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S491275. eCollection 2024.
2
Extrafine single inhaler triple therapy effectiveness in COPD patients previously treated with multiple-inhaler triple therapy: the TRIWIN study.既往接受多种吸入器三联疗法治疗的 COPD 患者中超细单吸入器三联疗法的疗效:TRIWIN 研究。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2024 Jan-Dec;18:17534666241263439. doi: 10.1177/17534666241263439.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Critical Error Frequency and the Impact of Training with Inhalers Commonly used for Maintenance Treatment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.严重错误发生率以及使用慢性阻塞性肺疾病维持治疗常用吸入器进行训练的影响。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Jun 9;15:1301-1313. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S224209. eCollection 2020.
2
The role of inspiratory flow in selection and use of inhaled therapy for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.吸气流量在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入治疗选择和使用中的作用。
Respir Med. 2020 Jan;161:105857. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.105857. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
3
Critical Inhaler Handling Error Is an Independent Risk Factor for Frequent Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Interim Results of a Single Center Prospective Study.
[Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): eosinophilia and novel drug therapies].
[慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD):嗜酸性粒细胞增多与新型药物疗法]
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2024 Jul;65(7):738-745. doi: 10.1007/s00108-024-01725-z. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
4
Does mixing inhaler devices lead to unchecked inhaler technique errors in patients with COPD? Findings from the cross-sectional observational MISMATCH study.混合吸入装置是否会导致 COPD 患者的吸入技术错误无法控制?来自横向观察性 MISMATCH 研究的结果。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023 Dec 22;10(1):e001821. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001821.
5
Prevalence and Factors Affecting Appropriate Inhaler Use in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Prospective Study.老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入器正确使用情况的患病率及影响因素:一项前瞻性研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 30;12(13):4420. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134420.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Single- versus Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy in a UK COPD Population: The INTREPID Trial.在英国 COPD 人群中,单吸入器三联疗法与多吸入器三联疗法的成本效益:INTREPID 试验。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Oct 25;17:2745-2755. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S370577. eCollection 2022.
吸入器使用严重失误是慢性阻塞性肺疾病频繁急性加重的独立危险因素:一项单中心前瞻性研究的中期结果
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Dec 2;14:2767-2775. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S234774. eCollection 2019.
4
A Cross-Sectional Study Assessing Appropriateness Of Inhaled Corticosteroid Treatment In Primary And Secondary Care Patients With COPD In Sweden.一项评估瑞典初级和二级护理中慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者吸入性糖皮质激素治疗适宜性的横断面研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Nov 5;14:2451-2460. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S218747. eCollection 2019.
5
What to consider before prescribing inhaled medications: a pragmatic approach for evaluating the current inhaler landscape.在开吸入药物之前需要考虑什么:评估当前吸入器领域的实用方法。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2019 Jan-Dec;13:1753466619884532. doi: 10.1177/1753466619884532.
6
Errors in inhaler use related to devices and to inhalation technique among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary health care.基层医疗保健中慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入器使用方面与装置及吸入技术相关的错误
Nurs Open. 2019 Aug 20;6(4):1519-1527. doi: 10.1002/nop2.357. eCollection 2019 Oct.
7
COPD: misuse of inhaler devices in clinical practice.COPD:临床实践中吸入器装置的误用。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 May 30;14:1209-1217. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S178040. eCollection 2019.
8
Impact of a Single Session of Inhalation Technique Training on Inhalation Skills and the Course of Asthma and COPD.单次吸入技术训练对哮喘和 COPD 患者吸入技能及病程的影响。
Respir Care. 2019 Oct;64(10):1250-1260. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06740. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
9
Systematic review of association between critical errors in inhalation and health outcomes in asthma and COPD.吸入性操作失误与哮喘和 COPD 患者健康结局相关性的系统评价。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2018 Nov 16;28(1):43. doi: 10.1038/s41533-018-0110-x.
10
A randomized, open-label, single-visit, crossover study simulating triple-drug delivery with Ellipta compared with dual inhaler combinations in patients with COPD.一项随机、开放标签、单次就诊、交叉研究,在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中模拟使用Ellipta进行三联药物递送并与双吸入器组合进行比较。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Aug 21;13:2515-2523. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S169060. eCollection 2018.