Suppr超能文献

严重错误发生率以及使用慢性阻塞性肺疾病维持治疗常用吸入器进行训练的影响。

Critical Error Frequency and the Impact of Training with Inhalers Commonly used for Maintenance Treatment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

作者信息

Collier David J, Wielders Pascal, van der Palen Job, Heyes Logan, Midwinter Dawn, Collison Kathryn, Preece Andy, Barnes Neil, Sharma Raj

机构信息

William Harvey Research Institute, Barts & The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts & The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Jun 9;15:1301-1313. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S224209. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Training in correct inhaler use, ideally in person or by video demonstration, can minimize errors but is rarely provided in clinics. This open-label, low-intervention study evaluated critical error rates with dry-powder inhalers (DPIs), before and after training, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

METHODS

Patients prescribed an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β-agonist (LABA) (ELLIPTA, Turbuhaler, or DISKUS), long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/LABA (ELLIPTA or Breezhaler), or LAMA-only DPI (ELLIPTA, HandiHaler, or Breezhaler) were enrolled. Critical errors were assessed before training (Visit 1 [V1]; primary endpoint) and 6 weeks thereafter (Visit 2 [V2]; secondary endpoint). Logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for between-group comparisons.

RESULTS

The intent-to-treat population comprised 450 patients. At V1, fewer patients made ≥1 critical error with ELLIPTA (10%) versus other ICS/LABA DPIs (Turbuhaler: 40%, OR 4.66, =0.005; DISKUS: 26%, OR 2.48, =0.114) and other LAMA or LAMA/LABA DPIs (HandiHaler: 34%, OR 3.50, =0.026; Breezhaler: 33%, OR 3.94, =0.012). Critical error rates with the primary ICS/LABA DPI were not significantly different between ELLIPTA ICS/LABA (10%) and ICS/LABA plus LAMA groups (12-25%). Critical errors with the primary ICS/LABA DPI occurred less frequently with ELLIPTA ICS/LABA with or without LAMA (11%) versus Turbuhaler ICS/LABA with or without LAMA (39%, OR 3.99, <0.001) and DISKUS ICS/LABA with or without LAMA (26%, OR 2.18, =0.069). Simulating single-inhaler versus multiple-inhaler triple therapy, critical error rates were lower with ELLIPTA fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI; 10%) versus ELLIPTA FF/VI plus LAMA (22%), considering errors with either DPI (OR 2.50, =0.108). At V2, critical error rates decreased for all DPIs/groups, reaching zero only for ELLIPTA. Between-group comparisons were similar to V1.

CONCLUSION

Fewer patients made critical errors with ELLIPTA versus other ICS/LABA, and LAMA or LAMA/LABA DPIs. The effect of "verbal" training highlights its importance for reducing critical errors with common DPIs.

摘要

引言

正确使用吸入器的培训,理想情况下是亲自培训或通过视频演示,可将错误降至最低,但在诊所中很少提供。这项开放标签、低干预研究评估了慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者在使用干粉吸入器(DPI)时,培训前后的严重错误率。

方法

纳入了处方吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)/长效β受体激动剂(LABA)(易纳器、都保或准纳器)、长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)/LABA(易纳器或布地奈德吸入粉雾剂)或仅使用LAMA的DPI(易纳器、HandiHaler或布地奈德吸入粉雾剂)的患者。在培训前(第1次就诊[V1];主要终点)和此后6周(第2次就诊[V2];次要终点)评估严重错误。使用逻辑回归模型计算组间比较的优势比(OR)。

结果

意向性治疗人群包括450名患者。在V1时,与其他ICS/LABA DPI(都保:40%,OR 4.66,P = 0.005;准纳器:26%,OR 2.48,P = 0.114)以及其他LAMA或LAMA/LABA DPI(HandiHaler:34%,OR 3.50,P = 0.026;布地奈德吸入粉雾剂:33%,OR 3.94,P = 0.012)相比,使用易纳器的患者出现≥1次严重错误的人数较少。主要ICS/LABA DPI的严重错误率在易纳器ICS/LABA(10%)和ICS/LABA加LAMA组(12 - 25%)之间无显著差异。无论有无LAMA,与都保ICS/LABA(39%,OR 3.99,P < 0.001)和准纳器ICS/LABA(26%,OR 2.18,P = 0.069)相比,易纳器ICS/LABA的主要ICS/LABA DPI出现严重错误的频率较低。模拟单吸入器与多吸入器三联疗法,考虑两种DPI的错误情况,与易纳器糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗(FF/VI;10%)相比,易纳器FF/VI加LAMA(22%)的严重错误率较低(OR 2.50,P = 0.108)。在V2时,所有DPI/组的严重错误率均下降,仅易纳器的严重错误率降至零。组间比较与V1相似。

结论

与其他ICS/LABA、LAMA或LAMA/LABA DPI相比,使用易纳器出现严重错误的患者较少。“口头”培训的效果凸显了其对于减少常见DPI严重错误的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc13/7294437/8c13c68908a9/COPD-15-1301-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验