Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Clin Obes. 2021 Jun;11(3):e12441. doi: 10.1111/cob.12441. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is an easy to use, portable tool, but the accuracy of the technique in infants and young children (<24 months) remains unclear. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies that have developed and validated BIA equations in this age group. MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched for relevant literature published up until June 30, 2020, using terms related to bioelectrical impedance, body composition, and paediatrics. Two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility, resulting in 15 studies that had developed and/or validated equations. Forty-six equations were developed and 34 validations were conducted. Most equations were developed in young infants (≤6 months), whereas only seven were developed among older infants and children (6-24 months). Most studies were identified as having a high risk of bias, and only a few included predominantly healthy children born at term. Using the best available evidence, BIA appears to predict body composition at least as well as other body composition tools; however, among younger infants BIA may provide little benefit over anthropometry-based prediction equations. Currently, none of the available equations can be recommended for use in research or in clinical practice.
生物电阻抗分析(BIA)是一种易于使用且便携的工具,但该技术在婴儿和幼儿(<24 个月)中的准确性仍不清楚。进行了系统的文献回顾,以确定在该年龄组中开发和验证 BIA 方程的研究。使用与生物电阻抗、身体成分和儿科学相关的术语,检索了截至 2020 年 6 月 30 日在 MEDLINE、Scopus、EMBASE 和 CENTRAL 上发表的相关文献。两名审查员独立筛选研究的合格性,最终有 15 项研究开发和/或验证了方程。开发了 46 个方程并进行了 34 次验证。大多数方程是在小婴儿(≤6 个月)中开发的,而只有 7 个是在较大婴儿和儿童(6-24 个月)中开发的。大多数研究被认为存在高偏倚风险,只有少数研究包括主要来自足月出生的健康儿童。根据最佳现有证据,BIA 似乎至少与其他身体成分工具一样能够预测身体成分;然而,在较小的婴儿中,BIA 可能不会比基于人体测量的预测方程提供更多的益处。目前,没有一种可用的方程可以推荐用于研究或临床实践。