• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

方案 T 中对另一眼进行治疗的风险因素。

Risk factors for fellow eye treatment in protocol T.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Boston University School of Medicine, 85 East Concord Street, 8th floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.

Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;259(8):2203-2212. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05108-0. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00417-021-05108-0
PMID:33566149
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify risk factors for fellow eye treatment of diabetic retinopathy with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) injections during the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.Net) Protocol T trial METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis of randomized clinical trial data, Cox regression analysis was performed at 52 and 104 weeks to determine risk factors for treatment in 360 fellow eyes. Survival analysis was performed to determine mean time to treatment based upon medication used.

RESULTS

Of 360 fellow eyes, 142 (39.4%) required treatment between weeks 4 and 104. Risk factors predicting a lower likelihood of year 1 treatment included older subject age (Hazard Ratio [HR]=0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99; p = 0.02) and higher baseline study eye ETDRS score (HR=0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99, p = 0.04). Center-involving DME at baseline in the fellow eye was predictive of a higher treatment need at both 52 (HR=1.89, 95% CI 1.42-2.51, p < 0.0001) and 104 weeks (HR=2.68, 95% CI 1.75-4.11, p < 0.0001). Subjects treated in the study eye with aflibercept (HR=0.574, 95% CI 0.371-0.887, p = 0.013) and ranibizumab (HR=0.58, 95%CI 0.36-0.94, p = 0.03) were less likely to require first year fellow eye injection than subjects treated with bevacizumab although this difference was no longer significant at week 104 (aflibercept HR=0.77, 95% CI 0.52-1.16, p = 0.21; ranibizumab HR=0.66, 95% CI 0.43-1.00, p = 0.05). Mean time to treatment was significantly shorter in the bevacizumab group (bevacizumab 25.83 weeks, aflibercept 38.75 weeks, ranibizumab 34.70 weeks (p=0.012)).

CONCLUSION

Bilateral treatment with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections was common during the DRCR.net Protocol T. Medication choice may impact the risk of fellow eye treatment.

摘要

目的

在糖尿病视网膜病变临床研究网络(DRCR.Net)协议 T 试验中,确定接受血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)注射治疗糖尿病性视网膜病变的对侧眼治疗的危险因素。

方法

在这项随机临床试验数据的事后分析中,在第 52 周和第 104 周进行 Cox 回归分析,以确定 360 只对侧眼中 360 只眼的治疗危险因素。进行生存分析以确定基于使用的药物治疗的平均时间。

结果

在 360 只对侧眼中,有 142 只(39.4%)在第 4 周至第 104 周之间需要治疗。预测第一年治疗可能性较低的危险因素包括年龄较大的患者年龄(风险比[HR]=0.98,95%CI 0.96-0.99;p=0.02)和较高的基线研究眼 ETDRS 评分(HR=0.98,95%CI 0.97-0.99,p=0.04)。对侧眼基线时累及中心的 DME 可预测 52 周(HR=1.89,95%CI 1.42-2.51,p<0.0001)和 104 周(HR=2.68,95%CI 1.75-4.11,p<0.0001)时更高的治疗需求。在研究眼中接受阿柏西普(HR=0.574,95%CI 0.371-0.887,p=0.013)和雷珠单抗(HR=0.58,95%CI 0.36-0.94,p=0.03)治疗的患者比接受贝伐单抗治疗的患者更不可能需要第一年的对侧眼注射,尽管在第 104 周时这种差异不再显著(阿柏西普 HR=0.77,95%CI 0.52-1.16,p=0.21;雷珠单抗 HR=0.66,95%CI 0.43-1.00,p=0.05)。贝伐单抗组的平均治疗时间明显缩短(贝伐单抗 25.83 周,阿柏西普 38.75 周,雷珠单抗 34.70 周(p=0.012))。

结论

在 DRCR.Net 协议 T 期间,双侧接受抗 VEGF 眼内注射治疗很常见。药物选择可能会影响对侧眼治疗的风险。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for fellow eye treatment in protocol T.方案 T 中对另一眼进行治疗的风险因素。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;259(8):2203-2212. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05108-0. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
2
Comparison of Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: Extrapolation of Data to Clinical Practice.阿柏西普、贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的比较:数据外推至临床实践
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;134(1):95-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4110.
3
Persistent Macular Thickening Following Intravitreous Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Central-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema With Vision Impairment: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.玻璃体内注射阿柏西普、贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗伴有视力损害的累及中心的糖尿病性黄斑水肿后持续性黄斑增厚:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 1;136(3):257-269. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6565.
4
Aflibercept, bevacizumab or ranibizumab for diabetic macular oedema: recent clinically relevant findings from DRCR.net Protocol T.阿柏西普、贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:DRCR.net方案T的近期临床相关研究结果
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov;28(6):636-643. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000424.
5
Risk Factors for Meeting Criteria for Switching from Bevacizumab to Aflibercept When Treating Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema and Visual Acuity of < 20/40.患有糖尿病性黄斑水肿且视力<20/40 的眼睛转为使用阿柏西普时符合转换标准的风险因素。
Ophthalmology. 2024 Aug;131(8):967-974. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.01.037. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
6
Prospective study of aflibercept for the treatment of persistent macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusions in eyes not responsive to long-term treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab.前瞻性研究阿柏西普治疗对长期贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗无反应的视网膜静脉阻塞继发持续性黄斑水肿的疗效。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;48(1):53-60. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13636. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
7
Cost-consequence analysis of extended loading dose of anti-VEGF treatment in diabetic macular edema patients.糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者抗VEGF治疗延长负荷剂量的成本-后果分析
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01637-0.
8
Assessment of the DRCR Retina Network Approach to Management With Initial Observation for Eyes With Center-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema and Good Visual Acuity: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.DRCR 视网膜网络初始观察方法治疗中心性糖尿病黄斑水肿和良好视力眼的评估:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr 1;138(4):341-349. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.6035.
9
Changes in Blood Pressure and Urine Albumin-Creatinine Ratio in a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema.比较阿柏西普、贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的随机临床试验中血压和尿白蛋白/肌酐比值的变化。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Mar 1;59(3):1199-1205. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22853.
10
Recent clinically relevant highlights from the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network.糖尿病视网膜病变临床研究网络近期的临床相关要点。
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018 May;29(3):199-205. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000472.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-World Persistence and Treatment Interval in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors in the USA.美国抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的真实世界持续治疗情况及治疗间隔
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Oct;12(5):2465-2477. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00750-9. Epub 2023 Jun 22.