• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的真实世界持续治疗情况及治疗间隔

Real-World Persistence and Treatment Interval in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors in the USA.

作者信息

Bakri Sophie J, Delyfer Marie-Noelle, Grauslund Jakob, Andersen Steffen, Karcher Helene

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA.

University of Bordeaux, Team "Lifelong Exposures, Health and Aging" (LEHA), Inserm U1219, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Oct;12(5):2465-2477. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00750-9. Epub 2023 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1007/s40123-023-00750-9
PMID:37347405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10441838/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is little understanding of long-term treatment persistence in patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections for diabetic macular edema (DME), particularly relating to treatment intervals. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between treatment interval and discontinuation rate after 24 months of unilateral anti-VEGF treatment in patients with DME under routine clinical care in the USA.

METHODS

This was a non-interventional, retrospective cohort study to review the health insurance claims of adults with DME linked with the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases, who were continuously enrolled in a health plan for at least 6 months prior to their first anti-VEGF treatment and for a duration of at least 24 months between July 2011 and June 2017. Patients were grouped on the basis of the injection interval they achieved at 24 months of treatment. Discontinuation rate beyond 24 months and its association with treatment intervals at 24 months was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

The overall discontinuation rate among the 1702 eligible patients from 24 to 60 months after treatment initiation was 30%. At 60 months, patients were more likely to remain on treatment in shorter (75.3% [4-week interval group]) versus longer treatment interval groups (62.1% [> 12-week interval group], difference = 13.2%, [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06, 2.06], p = 0.01). Patients on a > 12-week interval were twice as likely to discontinue treatment compared with those on an 8-week interval (hazard ratio = 2.01 [95% CI 1.43, 2.82], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with DME on longer anti-VEGF treatment intervals at 24 months consistently had higher discontinuation rates in the following years than those on shorter treatment intervals.

摘要

引言

对于接受抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)注射治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的患者的长期治疗依从性,尤其是与治疗间隔相关的情况,人们了解甚少。本研究的目的是调查在美国常规临床护理下,DME患者单侧抗VEGF治疗24个月后治疗间隔与停药率之间的关联。

方法

这是一项非干预性回顾性队列研究,旨在审查与IBM MarketScan商业数据库和医疗保险补充数据库相关联的DME成年患者的健康保险理赔记录,这些患者在首次接受抗VEGF治疗前至少连续参加健康计划6个月,且在2011年7月至2017年6月期间持续至少24个月。患者根据治疗2个月时达到的注射间隔进行分组。使用Kaplan-Meier方法和Cox比例风险模型估计24个月后的停药率及其与24个月时治疗间隔的关联。

结果

1702例符合条件的患者在治疗开始后24至60个月的总体停药率为30%。在60个月时,与较长治疗间隔组(62.1%[间隔>12周组])相比,较短治疗间隔组(75.3%[4周间隔组])的患者更有可能继续接受治疗,差异为13.2%,[95%置信区间(CI)1.06,2.06],p = 0.01。与8周间隔组相比,间隔>12周的患者停药可能性是其两倍(风险比=2.01[95%CI 1.43,2.82],p < 0.001)。

结论

接受抗VEGF治疗间隔较长的DME患者在随后几年的停药率始终高于治疗间隔较短的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1873/10441838/e0c51534479c/40123_2023_750_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1873/10441838/d1e5deec4f26/40123_2023_750_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1873/10441838/a164ed566c93/40123_2023_750_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1873/10441838/e0c51534479c/40123_2023_750_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1873/10441838/d1e5deec4f26/40123_2023_750_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1873/10441838/a164ed566c93/40123_2023_750_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1873/10441838/e0c51534479c/40123_2023_750_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Real-World Persistence and Treatment Interval in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors in the USA.美国抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的真实世界持续治疗情况及治疗间隔
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Oct;12(5):2465-2477. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00750-9. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
2
Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment Discontinuation and Interval in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the United States.美国新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的抗血管内皮生长因子治疗停药和间隔时间。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;242:189-196. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
3
Risk of Systemic Adverse Events Associated with Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema in Routine Clinical Practice.常规临床实践中抗 VEGF 药物玻璃体腔内注射治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的系统性不良事件风险。
Ophthalmology. 2019 Jul;126(7):1007-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.09.040. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
4
Real-World Injection Frequency and Cost of Ranibizumab and Aflibercept for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema.真实世界中雷珠单抗和阿柏西普治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性和糖尿病性黄斑水肿的注射频率和费用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Mar;26(3):253-266. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.19245. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
5
Risk of Systemic Adverse Events after Intravitreal Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, and Aflibercept in Routine Clinical Practice.在常规临床实践中玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗、雷珠单抗和阿柏西普的全身不良事件风险。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Mar;128(3):417-424. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.062. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
6
Determinants in Initial Treatment Choice for Diabetic Macular Edema.糖尿病性黄斑水肿初始治疗选择的决定因素
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Jan;4(1):41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 May 25.
7
Does HbA1c Level or Glomerular Filtration Rate Affect the Clinical Response to Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy (Ranibizumab or Aflibercept) in Diabetic Macular Edema? A Real-Life Experience.糖化血红蛋白水平或肾小球滤过率是否会影响糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者对内皮生长因子治疗(雷珠单抗或阿柏西普)的临床反应?一项真实病例经验。
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Oct;12(5):2657-2670. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00758-1. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
8
Treatment patterns in patients with age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema: A real-world claims analysis in Dubai.年龄相关性黄斑变性和糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的治疗模式:迪拜真实世界的理赔分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 13;16(7):e0254569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254569. eCollection 2021.
9
Persistent Macular Thickening Following Intravitreous Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Central-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema With Vision Impairment: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.玻璃体内注射阿柏西普、贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗伴有视力损害的累及中心的糖尿病性黄斑水肿后持续性黄斑增厚:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 1;136(3):257-269. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6565.
10
Treatment Patterns of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Laser Therapy Among Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema.抗血管内皮生长因子治疗和激光治疗在糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者中的应用模式。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Sep;21(9):735-41. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.9.735.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Treatments for Diabetic Macular Edema: Simulated Bevacizumab-First Step Therapy Versus Real-World Practice.糖尿病性黄斑水肿治疗的成本效益:模拟的贝伐单抗初始治疗与实际临床实践对比
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2025 Aug 11:24741264251359888. doi: 10.1177/24741264251359888.
2
Treatment Cessation in Patients with Diabetic Maculopathy under Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy Following a Treat-and-Extend Protocol.遵循“治疗并延长”方案的玻璃体腔抗VEGF治疗的糖尿病性黄斑病变患者的治疗终止情况
Ophthalmol Sci. 2025 Jun 2;5(6):100838. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2025.100838. eCollection 2025 Nov-Dec.
3
Twelve-Month Outcomes of Faricimab for Patients with Sub-Optimally Responsive Diabetic Macular Oedema: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment patterns and persistence rates with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for diabetic macular oedema in the UK: A real-world study.英国抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的治疗模式和持续率:一项真实世界研究。
Diabet Med. 2022 Apr;39(4):e14746. doi: 10.1111/dme.14746. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
2
Discontinuation and loss to follow-up rates in clinical trials of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections.玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子注射临床试验中的停药和失访率。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;260(1):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05246-5. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
3
Risk factors for fellow eye treatment in protocol T.
法西单抗治疗反应欠佳的糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的12个月结局:一项回顾性单中心研究
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 May 16;19:1583-1591. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S513009. eCollection 2025.
4
Measures of diabetic retinopathy treatment coverage: protocol for a methodological review.糖尿病视网膜病变治疗覆盖率的衡量方法:一项方法学综述的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 29;15(3):e092081. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092081.
5
Improving Clinical Management of Diabetic Macular Edema: Insights from a Global Survey of Patients, Healthcare Providers, and Clinic Staff.改善糖尿病性黄斑水肿的临床管理:来自全球患者、医疗服务提供者和诊所工作人员调查的见解
Ophthalmol Ther. 2025 Jan;14(1):229-246. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-01060-4. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
6
Dexamethasone implant for refractory macular edema secondary to diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusion.用于治疗糖尿病性视网膜病变和视网膜静脉阻塞继发难治性黄斑水肿的地塞米松植入剂
Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 18;17(10):1837-1842. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.10.09. eCollection 2024.
7
Sustained Disease Control in DME Patients upon Treatment Cessation with Brolucizumab.接受布罗利珠单抗治疗的糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者停药后疾病的持续控制情况。
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 7;13(6):1534. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061534.
方案 T 中对另一眼进行治疗的风险因素。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;259(8):2203-2212. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05108-0. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
4
Adherence of patients with diabetic macular oedema to intravitreal injections: A systematic review.糖尿病黄斑水肿患者对玻璃体腔内注射治疗的依从性:一项系统评价。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;48(9):1286-1298. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13845. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
5
Ranibizumab or Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema: Comparison of 1-Year Outcomes from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry.雷珠单抗或阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:抗视网膜病变!注册研究的 1 年结局比较。
Ophthalmology. 2020 May;127(5):608-615. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.11.018. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
6
Noncompliance in Prospective Retina Clinical Trials: Analysis of Factors Predicting Loss to Follow-up.前瞻性视网膜临床试验中的不依从性:预测失访因素的分析。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb;210:86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.10.012. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
7
Prevalence, incidence and future projection of diabetic eye disease in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis.欧洲糖尿病眼病的患病率、发病率和未来预测:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Jan;35(1):11-23. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00560-z. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
8
Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema.糖尿病性黄斑水肿的治疗。
Curr Diab Rep. 2019 Jul 29;19(9):68. doi: 10.1007/s11892-019-1188-4.
9
Graphical Depiction of Longitudinal Study Designs in Health Care Databases.图形化展示医疗数据库中的纵向研究设计。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Mar 19;170(6):398-406. doi: 10.7326/M18-3079. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
10
Association of treatment adherence with real-life VA outcomes in AMD, DME, and BRVO patients.年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)、糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)和视网膜分支静脉阻塞(BRVO)患者治疗依从性与实际生活中退伍军人事务部(VA)结局的关联。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 20;12:13-20. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S151611. eCollection 2018.