• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量和评估意大利样本中的波动持久幸福感和真实持久幸福感。

Measuring and Assessing Fluctuating and Authentic-Durable Happiness in Italian Samples.

机构信息

Department of Economics, Management and Territory, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy.

Department of Humanities, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 8;18(4):1602. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041602.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18041602
PMID:33567744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7915643/
Abstract

On the basis of the self-centeredness and selflessness model, a new instrument assessing two distinct dimensions of happiness, fluctuating and authentic-durable, was developed. The current research aimed at examining the factor structure of the Italian version of the instrument, its psychometric properties and construct validity. To this end, two studies were carried out. Study 1 (N = 544) examined different measurement models, from unidimensional to multidimensional, from a fully symmetrical bifactor solution to a bifactor (S-1) solution. Findings indicated better and adequate fit indices for the last model. Using various samples (n = 1274) Study 2 confirmed the bifactor (S-1) structure and analysed psychometric properties, convergent and divergent validity and temporal stability of the instrument. Findings generally gave evidence of the multidimensional conceptualization of the construct, good levels of reliability values and adequate convergent validity of both scales. Discriminant validity showed mixed results from no association of age with authentic-durable happiness to weak and negative association with fluctuating happiness. Test-retest reliability displayed an adequate value of correlation coefficient for the two set scores of the authentic dimension and a value below the recommended cut-off criteria for the fluctuating dimension, where significant differences in the mean scores emerged. Future studies should aim to replicate the results of this research and attempt to overcome its limitations.

摘要

基于自我中心和无私的模型,开发了一种新的工具来评估幸福感的两个不同维度,即波动和真实持久。本研究旨在检验该工具的意大利版本的因素结构、心理测量学特性和构念效度。为此,进行了两项研究。研究 1(N=544)检验了不同的测量模型,从单维度到多维度,从完全对称的双因素解决方案到双因素(S-1)解决方案。研究结果表明,最后一个模型的拟合指数更好且更合适。使用不同的样本(n=1274),研究 2 证实了双因素(S-1)结构,并分析了工具的心理测量特性、收敛和发散效度以及时间稳定性。研究结果普遍证明了该构念的多维概念化、两个量表的可靠性值水平良好和收敛效度适当。区分效度显示出混合结果,即年龄与真实持久的幸福感之间没有关联,与波动的幸福感之间存在较弱和负相关。重测信度显示,真实维度的两个成套分数的相关系数具有适当的值,而波动维度的相关系数低于推荐的临界值标准,其中均值分数出现了显著差异。未来的研究应该旨在复制本研究的结果,并尝试克服其局限性。

相似文献

1
Measuring and Assessing Fluctuating and Authentic-Durable Happiness in Italian Samples.测量和评估意大利样本中的波动持久幸福感和真实持久幸福感。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 8;18(4):1602. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041602.
2
Measuring happiness: from fluctuating happiness to authentic-durable happiness.衡量幸福:从波动的幸福到真实持久的幸福。
Front Psychol. 2012 Feb 7;3:16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00016. eCollection 2012.
3
Self-centeredness and selflessness: happiness correlates and mediating psychological processes.自我中心与无私:幸福的关联及中介心理过程
PeerJ. 2017 May 11;5:e3306. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3306. eCollection 2017.
4
Italian adaptation of the Multidimensional Iowa Suggestibility Scale (MISS).多维爱荷华暗示性量表(MISS)的意大利语改编版。
PeerJ. 2024 Apr 29;12:e17145. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17145. eCollection 2024.
5
Validity and reliability of the Italian version of the ECOS-16 questionnaire in postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis.ECOS-16问卷意大利语版本在患有骨质疏松症所致椎体骨折的绝经后女性中的效度和信度
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 May-Jun;25(3):390-403.
6
Assessing quality of life in severe obesity: development and psychometric properties of the ORWELL-R.评估重度肥胖患者的生活质量:ORWELL-R量表的编制与心理测量学特性
Eat Weight Disord. 2016 Jun;21(2):277-88. doi: 10.1007/s40519-015-0222-z. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
7
Assessing self-efficacy in type 2 diabetes management: validation of the Italian version of the Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale (IT-DMSES).评估 2 型糖尿病管理中的自我效能感:糖尿病管理自我效能量表(IT-DMSES)意大利版本的验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Apr 23;16(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0901-3.
8
Validation of an Italian version of the Oxford happiness inventory in adolescence.验证意大利版牛津幸福感量表在青少年中的适用性。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(2):175-85. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.645931.
9
The Pemberton Happiness Index: Validation of the Universal Portuguese version in a large Brazilian sample.彭伯顿幸福指数:通用葡萄牙语版本在巴西大样本中的验证。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(38):e4915. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004915.
10
The Italian version of the Outpatient Physical Therapy Improvement in Movement Assessment Log: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties.《门诊物理治疗运动评估日志》意大利语版:跨文化调适与心理测量特性
Int J Rehabil Res. 2018 Mar;41(1):28-34. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000256.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship between Subjective Well-being and Social Support among Jordanian University Students.约旦大学生主观幸福感与社会支持之间的关系
Psychol Russ. 2022 Jun 30;15(2):53-64. doi: 10.11621/pir.2022.0204. eCollection 2022.
2
Predicting happiness levels of European immigrants and natives: An application of Artificial Neural Network and Ordinal Logistic Regression.预测欧洲移民和本地人的幸福水平:人工神经网络与有序逻辑回归的应用
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 31;13:1012796. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012796. eCollection 2022.
3
Validation of the Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives for Activities-Revised Scale in Chinese Adults.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining the Dimensionality, Reliability, and Invariance of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) Across Eight Countries.考察抑郁、焦虑和压力量表 21 项(DASS-21)在八个国家的维度、信度和不变性。
Assessment. 2021 Sep;28(6):1531-1544. doi: 10.1177/1073191119887449. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
2
Italian Validation of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Factor Structure, Reliability, Convergent, and Discriminant Validity.《生活意义问卷》的意大利语验证:因子结构、信度、聚合效度和区分效度
Psychol Rep. 2020 Apr;123(2):578-600. doi: 10.1177/0033294118821302. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
3
Anomalous results in G-factor models: Explanations and alternatives.
活动的愉悦和幸福动机修订量表在中国成年人中的验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 9;18(8):3959. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083959.
G 因子模型中的异常结果:解释与替代方案。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Sep;22(3):541-562. doi: 10.1037/met0000083. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
4
Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices.评估双因子模型:计算和解释统计指数。
Psychol Methods. 2016 Jun;21(2):137-50. doi: 10.1037/met0000045. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
5
Applying Bifactor Statistical Indices in the Evaluation of Psychological Measures.双因素统计指标在心理测量评估中的应用。
J Pers Assess. 2016;98(3):223-37. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
6
Item response theory analysis of the life orientation test-revised: age and gender differential item functioning analyses.生活取向测试修订版的项目反应理论分析:年龄和性别差异项目功能分析
Assessment. 2015 Jun;22(3):341-50. doi: 10.1177/1073191114544471. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
7
Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality.多维性存在下心理测量的评分和建模。
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(2):129-40. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.725437. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
8
Measuring happiness: from fluctuating happiness to authentic-durable happiness.衡量幸福:从波动的幸福到真实持久的幸福。
Front Psychol. 2012 Feb 7;3:16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00016. eCollection 2012.
9
Validation of an Italian version of the Oxford happiness inventory in adolescence.验证意大利版牛津幸福感量表在青少年中的适用性。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(2):175-85. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.645931.
10
The Satisfaction With Life Scale.生活满意度量表。
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.