• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多维爱荷华暗示性量表(MISS)的意大利语改编版。

Italian adaptation of the Multidimensional Iowa Suggestibility Scale (MISS).

作者信息

Liuzza Marco Tullio, Tolomeo Eva, Occhiuto Giuseppe, Cilurzo Martina, Martino Iolanda, Cerasa Antonio

机构信息

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Calabria, Italy.

Department of Health Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Calabria, Italy.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2024 Apr 29;12:e17145. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17145. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.17145
PMID:38699191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11064866/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Suggestibility is a personality trait that reflects a general tendency to accept messages. The Multidimensional Iowa Suggestibility Scale (MISS) is a self-report scale developed to measure the degree of individuals' perceptions of their suggestibility. This study aimed to adapt the MISS in an Italian sample.

METHODS

We conducted two studies. In the first study, 345 subjects (270 females (78%), mean age = 36.21 years ± 14.06 SD) completed the translated Italian version of the MISS, composed of five subscales (consumer suggestibility; persuadability; sensation contagion; physiological reactivity; peer conformity). We investigated the structural validity of the scale through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) testing four measurement models (unidimensional, four-factor, hierarchical four factors, and bifactor) and explored reliability in terms of internal consistency through the McDonald's omega. In the second study, we cross-validated the MISS on a new independent sample. We enrolled 277 participants (196 females (71%), mean age 30.56, SD = 12.58) who underwent the new version of the scale. We performed factor analyses to test structural validity and compared four measurement models. Then, we investigated reliability and conducted a latent variable analysis to explore divergent validity.

RESULTS

The CFA in the first study revealed a bifactor solution of the MISS. This structure was interpretable and provided an adequate fit for the data. The final version of the scale was reduced to forty-six items with globally good indices of adaptation. The scale also demonstrated acceptable reliability in terms of internal consistency through the McDonald's Hierarchical Omega. In the second study, we found that the bifactor structure was confirmed. Factor loadings inspection revealed that there was no justification to report only the separate scores for the subscales. We also found that the scale showed good internal consistency, but mixed evidence for divergent validity.

CONCLUSIONS

In the end, the Italian version of the MISS demonstrated good psychometric properties which will be discussed in detail below.

摘要

背景

易受暗示性是一种反映接受信息总体倾向的人格特质。多维爱荷华易受暗示性量表(MISS)是一种为测量个体对自身易受暗示性的感知程度而编制的自陈量表。本研究旨在使MISS适用于意大利样本。

方法

我们进行了两项研究。在第一项研究中,345名受试者(270名女性(78%),平均年龄 = 36.21岁 ± 14.06标准差)完成了意大利语翻译版的MISS,该量表由五个分量表组成(消费者易受暗示性;可说服性;感觉感染;生理反应;同伴从众性)。我们通过验证性因素分析(CFA)测试四种测量模型(单维、四因素、层次四因素和双因素)来研究该量表的结构效度,并通过麦克唐纳ω系数从内部一致性方面探讨信度。在第二项研究中,我们在一个新的独立样本上对MISS进行交叉验证。我们招募了277名参与者(196名女性(71%),平均年龄30.56,标准差 = 12.58),他们接受了新版本的量表。我们进行因素分析以测试结构效度,并比较四种测量模型。然后,我们研究信度并进行潜在变量分析以探讨区分效度。

结果

第一项研究中的CFA揭示了MISS的双因素结构。这种结构是可解释的,并且对数据提供了充分的拟合。该量表的最终版本缩减为46个项目,具有总体良好的适配指标。该量表通过麦克唐纳层次ω系数在内部一致性方面也表现出可接受的信度。在第二项研究中,我们发现双因素结构得到了证实。因素载荷检验表明,没有理由只报告分量表的单独得分。我们还发现该量表显示出良好的内部一致性,但区分效度的证据不一。

结论

最终,意大利语版的MISS表现出良好的心理测量特性,将在下文详细讨论。

相似文献

1
Italian adaptation of the Multidimensional Iowa Suggestibility Scale (MISS).多维爱荷华暗示性量表(MISS)的意大利语改编版。
PeerJ. 2024 Apr 29;12:e17145. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17145. eCollection 2024.
2
Health-related quality of life in Iranian adolescents: a psychometric evaluation of the self-report form of the PedsQL 4.0 and an investigation of gender and age differences.伊朗青少年的健康相关生活质量:儿童生活质量量表4.0自我报告表的心理测量学评估及性别与年龄差异调查
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Mar 26;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01742-8.
3
Psychometric properties of an Arabic translation of the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA-2) questionnaire in a non-clinical sample of Arabic-speaking adults.多维度内感受性意识评估问卷(MAIA-2)阿拉伯语翻译版在阿拉伯语成年非临床样本中的心理测量学特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 9;23(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05067-2.
4
Individualised Care Scale-Nurse: Construct validity and internal consistency of the Spanish version.个性化护理量表-护士版:西班牙语版本的结构效度和内部一致性
Scand J Caring Sci. 2022 Jun;36(2):404-415. doi: 10.1111/scs.13051. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Body Perception Questionnaire.《身体知觉问卷》意大利语版的跨文化调适和心理计量特性。
PLoS One. 2021 May 27;16(5):e0251838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251838. eCollection 2021.
6
Chronic pain acceptance questionnaire: confirmatory factor analysis, reliability, and validity in Italian subjects with chronic low back pain.慢性疼痛接纳问卷:意大利慢性腰痛患者的验证性因子分析、信度和效度。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 1;38(13):E824-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182917299.
7
The Fear of Pain Questionnaire: Factor structure, validity and reliability of the Italian translation.疼痛恐惧问卷:意大利语翻译版的因子结构、效度和信度。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0210757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210757. eCollection 2019.
8
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) in a large and representative Swedish sample: is the use of the total scale and subscale scores justified?基于大样本和代表性瑞典样本的证据为本实践态度量表(EBPAS)的验证性因子分析:使用总量表和分量表得分是否合理?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Oct 14;20(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01126-4.
9
Validation of the Disaster Adaptation and Resilience Scale for Vulnerable Communities in Vietnam's Coastal Regions.越南沿海地区脆弱社区适应和恢复力量表的验证。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2024 May;57(3):279-287. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.24.110. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
10
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute effects of psilocybin on the dynamics of gaze fixations during visual aesthetic perception.裸盖菇素对视觉审美感知过程中注视动态的急性影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 9;15(1):24763. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10206-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Factorial validity of the problematic social media use scale among Chinese adults.中国成年人中问题性社交媒体使用量表的效标效度
Addict Behav. 2024 Jan;148:107855. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107855. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
2
Direct Verbal Suggestibility as a Predictor of Placebo Hypoalgesia Responsiveness.直接言语暗示性作为安慰剂性痛觉减退反应的预测指标
Psychosom Med. 2021;83(9):1041-1049. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000977.
3
Time to update our suggestibility scales.是时候更新我们的易感性量表了。
Conscious Cogn. 2021 Apr;90:103103. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103103. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
4
Direct verbal suggestibility: Measurement and significance.直接言语暗示性:测量与意义。
Conscious Cogn. 2021 Mar;89:103036. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.103036. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
5
A Critical Review of Standardized Measures of Hypnotic Suggestibility.催眠暗示性的标准化测量方法的批判性评价。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2021 Jan-Mar;69(1):50-71. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2021.1833209.
6
The Place of the Bifactor Model in Confirmatory Factor Analysis Investigations Into Construct Dimensionality in Language Testing.双因素模型在语言测试构念维度验证性因素分析研究中的地位
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 17;11:1357. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01357. eCollection 2020.
7
HYPNOTIC RESPONSIVENESS AND NONHYPNOTIC SUGGESTIBILITY:催眠反应性与非催眠暗示性:
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2020 Jan-Mar;68(1):38-67. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2020.1685330.
8
Neurobiology of placebo effect in Parkinson's disease: What we have learned and where we are going.帕金森病安慰剂效应的神经生物学:我们的所得与未来方向。
Mov Disord. 2018 Aug;33(8):1213-1227. doi: 10.1002/mds.27438.
9
Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here.谢谢克朗巴哈系数,接下来我们自己来。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):412-433. doi: 10.1037/met0000144. Epub 2017 May 29.
10
Best Alternatives to Cronbach's Alpha Reliability in Realistic Conditions: Congeneric and Asymmetrical Measurements.现实条件下克朗巴哈α信度的最佳替代方法:同属与不对称测量
Front Psychol. 2016 May 26;7:769. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769. eCollection 2016.