Ferentz K S, Sobal J, Colgan R
Department of Family Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201.
J Fam Pract. 1988 Apr;26(4):415-20.
Opinions about a four-year family practice residency were elicited from a nationally representative sample of three groups of family physicians. Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of 308 residency graduates aged 30 to 35 years, all 383 residency directors, and a random sample of 319 third-year residents. Two mailings produced an 82 percent response rate. A four-year residency was favored by 32 percent of recent graduates, 20 percent of program directors, and 34 percent of third-year residents. Over 60 percent of residents and recent graduates would have entered a family practice program had the residency been of four years' duration. Perceived barriers to a four-year residency included lack of resources, loss of appeal, and the additional time commitment. Respondents were most willing to complete a fourth year of residency to receive additional training in orthopedics, obstetrics, gynecology, and pediatrics. Many respondents believed that the additional year would be helpful in obtaining hospital privileges in obstetrics and in coronary care and intensive care units. This study provides information useful in discussions regarding extending residency training.
从三组具有全国代表性的家庭医生样本中,征集了关于四年家庭医疗住院医师培训项目的意见。问卷被邮寄给308名年龄在30至35岁之间的住院医师毕业生随机样本、所有383名住院医师培训项目主任以及319名三年级住院医师的随机样本。两次邮寄后的回复率为82%。32%的应届毕业生、20%的项目主任和34%的三年级住院医师赞成四年制住院医师培训项目。如果住院医师培训为期四年,超过60%的住院医师和应届毕业生会选择进入家庭医疗项目。四年制住院医师培训项目存在的障碍包括资源短缺、吸引力下降以及额外的时间投入。受访者最愿意完成第四年住院医师培训,以获得骨科、妇产科和儿科方面的额外培训。许多受访者认为,额外的一年对获得产科以及冠心病护理和重症监护病房的医院特权会有所帮助。这项研究为有关延长住院医师培训的讨论提供了有用信息。