• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 3D 打印技术制作的定制无牙颌托盘的精度。

Evaluation of Precision of Custom Edentulous Trays Fabricated with 3D Printing Technologies.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2021 Jan-Feb;34(1):109-117. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7101.

DOI:10.11607/ijp.7101
PMID:33570526
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the reserved space quantity and printing accuracy of custom edentulous trays produced by two 3D printing methods (fused deposition modeling [FDM] and stereolithography apparatus [SLA]) and to compare them to traditional handmade (HM) methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The tissue surface data of maxillary and mandibular edentulous gypsum models were obtained through a 3D scanner to design the digital custom trays in Geomagic software. The custom trays were then printed with FDM and SLA technologies, and handmade custom trays were used as control. The scanned data of printing trays were registered with their digital data, and the printing errors were analyzed using the deviation analysis function. The distances between the tissue surface of gypsum models and the custom trays were measured in ImageWare and represented by 3D deviation.

RESULTS

None of the six groups revealed a significant difference (P > .05) compared to the set value of 1.00 mm. In the SLA group, the deviation of the mandibular area was significantly closer to the set value than for the HM group (P < .05), while no significant difference was displayed between the other groups. For the printing error between the two 3D groups, the SLA method showed significantly less error and better stability (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

3D-printed custom trays can meet clinical needs in the adaptability of tissue surfaces, and SLA-printed trays revealed better precision and less error than the other two methods. Accordingly, the use of SLA technology to make a 3D-printed custom tray is expected to be promoted in clinical practice.

摘要

目的

评估两种 3D 打印方法(熔融沉积建模 [FDM] 和立体光固化设备 [SLA])和传统手工制作(HM)方法制作的无牙颌托盘的预留空间量和打印精度,并对其进行比较。

材料与方法

通过 3D 扫描仪获取上颌和下颌无牙石膏模型的组织表面数据,在 Geomagic 软件中设计数字定制托盘。然后使用 FDM 和 SLA 技术打印定制托盘,并将手工定制托盘作为对照。将打印托盘的扫描数据与数字数据进行配准,并使用偏差分析功能分析打印误差。在 ImageWare 中测量石膏模型的组织表面和定制托盘之间的距离,并以 3D 偏差表示。

结果

与 1.00mm 的设定值相比,六个组均未显示出显著差异(P>0.05)。在 SLA 组中,下颌区域的偏差明显更接近设定值,而与 HM 组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而其他组之间无显著差异。对于两种 3D 组之间的打印误差,SLA 方法显示出更小的误差和更好的稳定性(P<0.001)。

结论

3D 打印定制托盘可以满足组织表面适应性的临床需求,SLA 打印托盘的精度优于其他两种方法,误差更小。因此,预计在临床实践中推广使用 SLA 技术制作 3D 打印定制托盘。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Precision of Custom Edentulous Trays Fabricated with 3D Printing Technologies.评估 3D 打印技术制作的定制无牙颌托盘的精度。
Int J Prosthodont. 2021 Jan-Feb;34(1):109-117. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7101.
2
[Computer aided design and 3-dimensional printing for the production of custom trays of maxillary edentulous jaws based on 3-dimensional scan of primary impression].基于初印模三维扫描的上颌无牙颌定制托盘制作的计算机辅助设计与三维打印
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016 Oct 18;48(5):900-904.
3
Application of FDM three-dimensional printing technology in the digital manufacture of custom edentulous mandible trays.熔融沉积成型三维打印技术在定制无牙下颌托盘数字化制造中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 14;6:19207. doi: 10.1038/srep19207.
4
[Quantitative evaluation of printing accuracy and tissue surface adaptation of mandibular complete denture polylactic acid pattern fabricated by fused deposition modeling technology].[基于熔融沉积成型技术制作的下颌全口义齿聚乳酸模型打印精度及组织面适合性的定量评价]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 9;52(6):342-345. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2017.06.004.
5
Evaluation of Implant Impression Accuracy Using Different Trays and Techniques with a 3D Superimposition Method.采用三维叠加法评估不同托盘和技术的种植体印模精度。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024 Aug 29;39(4):595-602. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10655.
6
Evaluation of a novel 3D-printed custom tray for the impressions of edentulous jaws.评价一种用于无牙颌印模的新型 3D 打印定制托盘。
J Dent. 2022 Oct;125:104279. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104279. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
7
Accuracy of multi-implant impressions using 3D-printing custom trays and splinting versus conventional techniques for complete arches.多种植体印模使用 3D 打印定制托盘和夹板与传统技术在全口的准确性比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 July/August;34(4):1007–1014. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7049. Epub 2019 May 20.
8
Accuracy of three-dimensional dental resin models created by fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, and Polyjet prototype technologies: A comparative study.三维牙本质树脂模型的精度由熔融沉积建模、立体光刻和 Polyjet 原型技术创建:一项比较研究。
Angle Orthod. 2018 May;88(3):363-369. doi: 10.2319/071117-460.1. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
9
Dimensional Stability and Retention Strength of Impressions to Custom Impression Trays Fabricated Using Conventional Method and Additive Technology - An In-vitro Study.采用传统方法和增材制造技术制作定制印模托盘的尺寸稳定性和保留强度:一项体外研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2023 Oct 1;34(4):427-432. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_519_23. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
10
Clinical evaluation of final impressions from three-dimensional printed custom trays.三维打印定制托盘最终印模的临床评估
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 2;7(1):14958. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14005-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Expert consensus on digital restoration of complete dentures.全口义齿数字化修复专家共识
Int J Oral Sci. 2025 Jul 30;17(1):58. doi: 10.1038/s41368-025-00388-2.
2
Clinical evaluation of computer-aided design and three-dimensional printing for completely edentulous mandibular custom tray fabrication: assessing clinician satisfaction.计算机辅助设计和三维打印用于全口无牙下颌定制托盘制作的临床评估:评估临床医生满意度
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 May 21;13:1556651. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1556651. eCollection 2025.
3
Chairside 3-D printed impression trays: a new approach to increase the accuracy of conventional implant impression taking? An in vitro study.
椅旁 3D 打印印模托盘:提高传统种植体印模制取精度的新方法?一项体外研究。
Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Dec 6;9(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00516-9.
4
Comparative Verification of the Accuracy of Implant Models Made of PLA, Resin, and Silicone.聚乳酸、树脂和硅胶制成的种植体模型准确性的比较验证
Materials (Basel). 2023 Apr 23;16(9):3307. doi: 10.3390/ma16093307.