• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价细菌群落模拟胃肠道条件下的丙烯酰胺去除性能。

Evaluation of acrylamide-removing properties of bacterial consortia under simulated gastrointestinal conditions.

机构信息

Unidad de Investigación y Desarrollo en Alimentos (UNIDA), Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Veracruz, Veracruz, Mexico.

Laboratorio de Química y Biotecnología de Productos Lácteos, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo A. C., Hermosillo, Mexico.

出版信息

J Sci Food Agric. 2021 Sep;101(12):5049-5055. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11149. Epub 2021 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1002/jsfa.11149
PMID:33570782
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated the acrylamide-removing properties of probiotic monocultures; however, potential advantages of consortia over monocultures in reducing the dietary exposure to acrylamide have not been proven. Hence this work aims to assess the acrylamide (AA)-binding properties of bacterial consortia, consisting of either probiotic strains and / or representative bacteria of duodenal microbiota, exposed to simulated gastrointestinal conditions (SGC). The AA binding capacity of ten probiotic strains (PS) and six duodenal strains (NDS) was evaluated under different conditions; then, three different consortia (PS, NDS, and PS + NDS) were assessed under SGC.

RESULTS

Among individual PS, Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, Lactobacillus fermentum J23, L. pentosus J37 and J24, and L. casei Shirota, exhibited the highest AA-binding capacity (80-87%), while Bifidobacterium catenulatun ATCC27676, Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus ATCC19258, and S. gallolyticus ATCC9809 were the best (ca. 68%) NDS monocultures. Probiotic strain consortia showed higher (P < 0.05) AA binding capacity (> 90%) than monoculture bacteria. Conversely, individual NDS cultures displayed higher (P < 0.05) binding capacity than NDS consortia (60%). A significant reduction (P < 0.05) in AA removal capacity was observed when consortia were exposed to SGC, PS consortia being the most effective (> 60% removal).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that consortia of specific PS could play an important role in reducing the intestinal availability of acrylamide. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.

摘要

背景

先前的研究已经证明了益生菌的单培养物具有去除丙烯酰胺的特性;然而,与单培养物相比, consortium 在降低膳食中丙烯酰胺暴露方面的潜在优势尚未得到证实。因此,本研究旨在评估暴露于模拟胃肠道条件(SGC)下的益生菌和/或十二指肠微生物群代表细菌组成的细菌 consortium 的丙烯酰胺(AA)结合特性。在不同条件下评估了 10 株益生菌(PS)和 6 株十二指肠菌(NDS)的 AA 结合能力;然后,在 SGC 下评估了三种不同的 consortium(PS、NDS 和 PS+NDS)。

结果

在单独的 PS 中,凝结芽孢杆菌 GBI-30、发酵乳杆菌 J23、J37 和 J24 以及干酪乳杆菌 Shirota 表现出最高的 AA 结合能力(80-87%),而双歧杆菌 catenulatun ATCC27676、唾液链球菌乳亚种。嗜热亚种 ATCC19258 和 S. gallolyticus ATCC9809 是最好的(约 68%)NDS 单培养物。益生菌菌株 consortium 显示出更高(P<0.05)的 AA 结合能力(>90%)高于单培养细菌。相反,个体 NDS 培养物显示出更高(P<0.05)的结合能力高于 NDS consortium(60%)。当 consortium 暴露于 SGC 时,AA 去除能力显著降低(P<0.05),PS consortium 的效果最为显著(>60%去除)。

结论

这些结果表明,特定 PS 的 consortium 可能在降低肠道中丙烯酰胺的可用性方面发挥重要作用。©2021 化学工业协会。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of acrylamide-removing properties of bacterial consortia under simulated gastrointestinal conditions.评价细菌群落模拟胃肠道条件下的丙烯酰胺去除性能。
J Sci Food Agric. 2021 Sep;101(12):5049-5055. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11149. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
2
Evaluation of acrylamide-removing properties of two Lactobacillus strains under simulated gastrointestinal conditions using a dynamic system.使用动态系统在模拟胃肠道条件下评估两种乳酸杆菌菌株去除丙烯酰胺的特性。
Microbiol Res. 2016 Sep;190:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2016.04.016. Epub 2016 May 10.
3
Study of Potential Synergistic Effect of Probiotic Formulas on Acrylamide Reduction.益生菌配方对丙烯酰胺降低的潜在协同作用研究。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 28;24(5):4693. doi: 10.3390/ijms24054693.
4
The resistance of Bacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Lactobacillus strains with claimed probiotic properties in different food matrices exposed to simulated gastrointestinal tract conditions.不同食品基质中声称具有益生菌特性的芽孢杆菌、双歧杆菌和乳杆菌菌株在模拟胃肠道条件下的抗性。
Food Res Int. 2019 Nov;125:108542. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108542. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
5
Protective Effect of the Intracellular Content from Potential Probiotic Bacteria against Oxidative Damage Induced by Acrylamide in Human Erythrocytes.潜在益生菌细胞内物质对丙烯酰胺诱导的人红细胞氧化损伤的保护作用。
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2020 Dec;12(4):1459-1470. doi: 10.1007/s12602-020-09636-9.
6
Restoration of cefixime-induced gut microbiota changes by Lactobacillus cocktails and fructooligosaccharides in a mouse model.在小鼠模型中,用乳酸菌组合和低聚果糖恢复头孢克肟引起的肠道微生物群变化。
Microbiol Res. 2017 Jul;200:14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
7
Selection of Gut-Resistant Bacteria and Construction of Microbial Consortia for Improving Gluten Digestion under Simulated Gastrointestinal Conditions.在模拟胃肠道条件下改善谷蛋白消化的耐胃酸细菌的选择和微生物群落的构建。
Nutrients. 2021 Mar 19;13(3):992. doi: 10.3390/nu13030992.
8
Effect of potato fiber on survival of Lactobacillus species at simulated gastric conditions and composition of the gut microbiota in vitro.马铃薯纤维对模拟胃液条件下乳酸菌属生存的影响及体外肠道微生物组的组成。
Food Res Int. 2019 Nov;125:108644. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108644. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
9
Effect of chestnut extract and chestnut fiber on viability of potential probiotic Lactobacillus strains under gastrointestinal tract conditions.板栗提取物和板栗纤维对胃肠道条件下潜在益生菌乳杆菌菌株活力的影响。
Food Microbiol. 2013 Dec;36(2):161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 May 25.
10
Is Acrylamide as Harmful as We Think? A New Look at the Impact of Acrylamide on the Viability of Beneficial Intestinal Bacteria of the Genus .丙烯酰胺真如我们所想的那样有害吗?重新审视丙烯酰胺对有益肠道细菌属. 的生存能力的影响
Nutrients. 2020 Apr 21;12(4):1157. doi: 10.3390/nu12041157.

引用本文的文献

1
Dietary Exposure to Acrylamide Has Negative Effects on the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Review.膳食中丙烯酰胺的摄入对胃肠道有负面影响:综述。
Nutrients. 2024 Jun 26;16(13):2032. doi: 10.3390/nu16132032.