University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, Whitewater, WI, United States of America.
Ethnobotanical Society of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 11;16(2):e0246390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246390. eCollection 2021.
An account of total of 58 plant species including 57 genera and 43 families was reported as useful in ethnomedicine from semi-structured questionnaire survey to the 76 participants of Kaski and Baitadi districts, Nepal. Fieldwork and participatory meetings were carried out between September 2017 and January 2018. A total of 419 emic use reports including 150 from Kaski and 269 from Baitadi were reported from 58 ethnomedicinal plant species. Each species was reported for 2-43 use reports and each participant recorded 1-12 use reports. About 25% (n = 104) use reports were associated with the treatment of digestive system disorders followed by 83 for general complaints. Of the species assessed, 53 species had IASc value < 0.25 and only five species had > 0.25. Species Swertia chirayita, Paris polyphylla, Bergenia ciliata, Valeriana jatamansi and Centella asiatica with > 0.25 IASc were found to be highly consented; however they were incongruent between the sample groups and sites. Divergent plant use knowledge specific to each sample district and group was corresponding to the heterogeneity of socio-economy and culture of the sites. Gender, ethnicity, household economy and food availability of the respondents were leading factors affecting the plant use knowledge. Despite the sites were relatively homogenous in eco-physiography, they possessed the distinct plant use knowledge, hinted that the socio-economic factors are more explanatory in plant use knowledge.
本研究通过半结构化问卷对尼泊尔卡斯基和拜塔迪地区的 76 名参与者进行了民族医学调查,共报道了 58 种植物,包括 57 属和 43 科,这些植物在民族医学中具有一定的用途。实地调查和参与式会议于 2017 年 9 月至 2018 年 1 月期间进行。共报道了 419 种植物的民间用途报告,其中 150 种来自卡斯基,269 种来自拜塔迪。从 58 种药用植物中报告了每种植物 2-43 种用途报告,每个参与者记录了 1-12 种用途报告。约有 25%(n=104)的用途报告与治疗消化系统疾病有关,其次是 83%的用途报告与一般疾病有关。在所评估的物种中,有 53 种物种的 IASc 值<0.25,只有 5 种物种的 IASc 值>0.25。IASc 值>0.25的物种如獐牙菜、云南重楼、岩白菜、缬草和积雪草被认为是高度一致的;然而,它们在样本组和地点之间并不一致。每个样本区和组特定的植物使用知识的差异与各地点的社会经济和文化的异质性相对应。受访者的性别、族裔、家庭经济和食物供应是影响植物使用知识的主要因素。尽管这些地点在生态生理学上相对同质,但它们拥有独特的植物使用知识,这表明社会经济因素在植物使用知识中更具解释力。