Mannweiler E, Thöle A, Lederer I
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1977 Aug;238(4):494-502.
Serum samples of 49 patients with echinococcosis, 32 of whom were diagnosed parasitologically (demonstration of protoscolices) and 17 of whom were diagnosed clinically (scintigram, histology), were examined for the presence of antibodies. The control group included sera from 74 patients with liver disease and tumors, 10 sera from blood donors, and 1330 sera for which serological tests for echinococcosis had been requested. The antigens used were two types of hydatid fluid, and aqueous extract from E. multilocularis cyst material, and protoscolices from E. granulosus and E. multilocularis. The results showed that the indirect immunofluorescence test with vital protoscolices was the most specific reaction whereas the indirect hemagglutination test with hydatid fluid and the extract from E. multilocularis was the most sensitive reaction. The latex turned out to be the least specific of the methods used. The sensitivity and specificity of our own results are compared with those of other investigators to emphasize the limitations of the immunodiagnosis of echinococcosis.
对49例包虫病患者的血清样本进行了抗体检测,其中32例经寄生虫学诊断(发现原头节),17例经临床诊断(闪烁扫描、组织学检查)。对照组包括74例肝病和肿瘤患者的血清、10例献血者的血清以及1330例曾要求进行包虫病血清学检测的血清。所用抗原有两种类型的棘球蚴液、多房棘球绦虫囊肿材料的水提取物以及细粒棘球绦虫和多房棘球绦虫的原头节。结果表明,用活原头节进行的间接免疫荧光试验是最具特异性的反应,而用棘球蚴液和多房棘球绦虫提取物进行的间接血凝试验是最敏感的反应。结果表明,乳胶法是所用方法中特异性最低的。将我们自己的结果的敏感性和特异性与其他研究者的结果进行比较,以强调包虫病免疫诊断的局限性。