Institute for Occupational Safety and Environmental Health, Rīga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema 16, LV-1007 Rīga, Latvia.
Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Rīga Stradiņš University, Kronvalda Boulevard 9, LV-1010 Rīga, Latvia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 29;18(3):1193. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031193.
Sickness absence is one of the most important working population health indicators. It is a complex phenomenon that is investigated by health care and occupational health specialists, economists, and work psychologists. Sickness absence is used as a predictor for morbidity and mortality, but besides the health status of an individual, sickness absence is influenced by demographic, socio-economic factors, and work environment factors. Conflicts at work are a common psychosocial risk factor that can affect sickness absence. The aim of the study was to investigate the association between different types of workplace conflict and self-reported medically certified sickness absence using cross-sectional survey data pooled from four periodic national surveys-Work conditions and risks in Latvia (2006-2018). The sample is representative of the working population of Latvia, as respondents were randomly drawn from different regions and industries. In total, the study sample ( = 8557) consisted of employees between 16 and 80 years old (average 42.8 +/- 12.6) of which 46.2% were males and 53.8% were females. Researchers used the computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI) method for collecting data. The association between workplace conflicts and sickness absence was analysed by using binomial logistic regression and calculated as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), with adjustment for gender, age, education and survey year. The risk of sickness absence was higher among women (OR = 1.24, CI 1.13-1.35), employees aged 25-44 years old and employees with higher income. Controlling for socio-demographic factors and survey year, the odds of sickness absence increased significantly for all types of workplace conflict analysed. The strongest association with sickness absence was related to conflicts between managers and employees (OR = 1.51, CI 1.37-1.66) and conflicts between groups of employees (OR = 1.45, CI 1.31-1.61). Conflicts between employees and with customers also increased the odds of sickness absence (OR = 1.39, CI 1.27-1.52 and OR = 1.11, CI 1.01-1.23, respectively). Our findings suggest that tailored interventions at a company level for reducing workplace conflicts as risk factors of sickness absence are required. Those should focus on the improvement of managers' leadership and human resource management skills.
缺勤是最重要的工作人群健康指标之一。它是一个复杂的现象,受到医疗保健和职业健康专家、经济学家和工作心理学家的研究。缺勤被用作发病率和死亡率的预测指标,但除了个人的健康状况外,缺勤还受到人口统计学、社会经济因素和工作环境因素的影响。工作冲突是一种常见的社会心理风险因素,可能会影响缺勤。本研究的目的是使用来自拉脱维亚四个定期全国调查(工作条件和风险,2006-2018 年)的横断面调查数据,研究不同类型的工作场所冲突与自我报告的经医学证明的病假之间的关联。该样本代表了拉脱维亚的工作人群,因为受访者是从不同地区和行业中随机抽取的。研究样本共有 8557 名年龄在 16 至 80 岁之间的员工(平均年龄为 42.8 +/- 12.6),其中 46.2%为男性,53.8%为女性。研究人员使用计算机辅助个人访谈(CAPI)方法收集数据。使用二项逻辑回归分析工作场所冲突与病假之间的关联,并计算优势比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI),调整性别、年龄、教育和调查年份。女性(OR=1.24,CI 1.13-1.35)、25-44 岁的员工和收入较高的员工病假风险较高。在控制社会人口因素和调查年份后,所有类型的工作场所冲突分析均显著增加了病假的可能性。与员工和客户之间的冲突也增加了病假的几率(OR=1.39,CI 1.27-1.52 和 OR=1.11,CI 1.01-1.23,分别)。我们的研究结果表明,需要在公司层面采取有针对性的干预措施,减少工作场所冲突作为病假的风险因素。这些干预措施应侧重于提高管理人员的领导能力和人力资源管理技能。