Suppr超能文献

蓖麻毒素抗体对不同蓖麻毒素同工型和品种的中和能力。

Ricin Antibodies' Neutralizing Capacity against Different Ricin Isoforms and Cultivars.

机构信息

Paris-Saclay University, CEA, INRAE, Medicines and Healthcare Technologies Department (DMTS), SPI, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Department, Anti-Infectious Biotherapies and Immunity Unit, Army Biomedical Research Institute, 91220 Brétigny-sur-Orge, France.

出版信息

Toxins (Basel). 2021 Jan 29;13(2):100. doi: 10.3390/toxins13020100.

Abstract

Ricin, a highly toxic protein from , is considered a potential biowarfare agent. Despite the many data available, no specific treatment has yet been approved. Due to their ability to provide immediate protection, antibodies (Abs) are an approach of choice. However, their high specificity might compromise their capacity to protect against the different ricin isoforms (D and E) found in the different cultivars. In previous work, we have shown the neutralizing potential of different Abs (43RCA-G1 (anti ricin A-chain) and RB34 and RB37 (anti ricin B-chain)) against ricin D. In this study, we evaluated their protective capacity against both ricin isoforms. We show that: (i) RB34 and RB37 recognize exclusively ricin D, whereas 43RCA-G1 recognizes both isoforms, (ii) their neutralizing capacity in vitro varies depending on the cultivar, and (iii) there is a synergistic effect when combining RB34 and 43RCA-G1. This effect is also demonstrated in vivo in a mouse model of intranasal intoxication with ricin D/E (1:1), where approximately 60% and 40% of mice treated 0 and 6 h after intoxication, respectively, are protected. Our results highlight the importance of evaluating the effectiveness of the Abs against different ricin isoforms to identify the treatment with the broadest spectrum neutralizing effect.

摘要

蓖麻毒素是一种来自蓖麻的高毒性蛋白,被认为是一种潜在的生物战剂。尽管有许多数据可用,但尚未批准任何特定的治疗方法。由于抗体(Abs)能够提供即时保护,因此是首选方法。然而,它们的高特异性可能会影响它们保护不同品种中发现的不同蓖麻毒素同工型(D 和 E)的能力。在之前的工作中,我们已经证明了不同 Abs(43RCA-G1(抗蓖麻毒素 A 链)和 RB34 和 RB37(抗蓖麻毒素 B 链))对蓖麻毒素 D 的中和潜力。在这项研究中,我们评估了它们对两种同工型的保护能力。我们表明:(i)RB34 和 RB37 仅识别蓖麻毒素 D,而 43RCA-G1 识别两种同工型,(ii)它们在体外的中和能力取决于品种,(iii)当组合使用 RB34 和 43RCA-G1 时会产生协同作用。这种协同作用在体内用蓖麻毒素 D/E(1:1)进行鼻内中毒的小鼠模型中也得到了证明,其中分别在中毒后 0 和 6 小时接受治疗的约 60%和 40%的小鼠得到了保护。我们的结果强调了评估 Abs 对不同蓖麻毒素同工型的有效性以确定具有最广泛中和效果的治疗方法的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc84/7911099/b1a60ae79290/toxins-13-00100-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验