Suppr超能文献

用于相对评估替代婴儿培养箱环境的电加热模拟器

Electrically heated simulator for relative evaluation of alternative infant incubator environments.

作者信息

Ultman J S, Berman S, Kirlin P, Vreslovic J M, Baer C B, Marks K H

机构信息

Department of Chemical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802.

出版信息

Med Instrum. 1988 Feb;22(1):33-8.

PMID:3357463
Abstract

A 10.9-cm diameter, copper ellipsoid was electrically heated to provide a simulation of sensible heat transfer from a newborn infant. The use of this simulator to determine mean radiant temperature and convective heat-transfer coefficient was demonstrated in three commercial incubators: the Isolette (Model C-86, Narco/Air Shields); the Armstrong Care-ette (Ohio Medical Products); and the I. C. (Ohmeda). The relative performance of these environmental therapeutic devices in shielding an infant against radiant heat loss was judged by the deviation of mean radiant temperature from incubator air temperature, which was varied from 32-36 degrees C. Whereas the I. C. incubator exhibited a radiant temperature always 0.5 degrees C less than air temperature, the Care-ette incubator showed radiant temperatures of 4.0-5.5 degrees C below air temperature, and the Isolette displayed radiant temperatures of 2.7-4.7 degrees C (inner wall removed) and 2.0-3.8 degrees C (inner wall inserted) below air temperature. The relative performance of the incubators in preventing convective heat loss was judged from the magnitude of the convective heat-transfer coefficient, hv. The I. C. incubator had an hv = 4.52 W/m2/degrees C; the Care-ette, 5.55 W/m2/degrees C; and the Isolette 7.19 W/m2/degrees C (inner wall removed) and 6.23 W/m2/degrees C (inner wall inserted). Although an ellipsoid simulator is not an anatomically correct substitute for an infant, it does provide a reliable and convenient comparison of steady-state heat transfer characteristics of alternative environmental devices.

摘要

一个直径为10.9厘米的铜质椭球体被电加热,以模拟新生儿的显热传递。在三种商用婴儿培养箱中展示了使用该模拟器来确定平均辐射温度和对流换热系数:Isolette(C - 86型,Narco/Air Shields公司);阿姆斯特朗Care - ette(俄亥俄医疗产品公司);以及I.C.(Ohmeda公司)。通过平均辐射温度与培养箱空气温度的偏差来判断这些环境治疗设备在保护婴儿免受辐射热损失方面的相对性能,空气温度在32 - 36摄氏度之间变化。I.C.培养箱的辐射温度总是比空气温度低0.5摄氏度,Care - ette培养箱的辐射温度比空气温度低4.0 - 5.5摄氏度,而Isolette培养箱(移除内壁)的辐射温度比空气温度低2.7 - 4.7摄氏度,(插入内壁)比空气温度低2.0 - 3.8摄氏度。根据对流换热系数hv的大小来判断培养箱在防止对流热损失方面的相对性能。I.C.培养箱的hv = 4.52 W/m²/°C;Care - ette培养箱为5.55 W/m²/°C;Isolette培养箱(移除内壁)为7.19 W/m²/°C,(插入内壁)为6.23 W/m²/°C。虽然椭球体模拟器在解剖学上并非婴儿的正确替代品,但它确实为替代环境设备的稳态传热特性提供了可靠且便捷的比较。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验