• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对 COVID-19 的预先护理计划长期护理计划。

An advance care planning long-term care initiative in response to COVID-19.

机构信息

University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Department of Medicine, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Apr;69(4):861-867. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17051. Epub 2021 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.17051
PMID:33577704
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8013602/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Describe a systematic approach to address advance care planning (ACP) during a COVID-19 outbreak and its impact on the incidence of new do-not-hospitalize (DNH) directives among long-term care (LTC) residents.

DESIGN

Prospective quality improvement initiative.

SETTING

Two long-term chronic care campuses within a large academic healthcare organization.

PARTICIPANTS

LTC residents with activated healthcare proxies who lacked DNH directives based on documentation in the electronic medical record (EMR) as of April 13, 2020.

INTERVENTION

Using a structured discussion guide, trained healthcare staff from various disciplines contacted the residents' proxies to conduct COVID-19 focused ACP discussions. Residents without DNH directives with COVID-19 were prioritized. Preferences ascertained in the discussion were communicated to the residents' primary care teams and directives were updated in the EMR accordingly.

MEASUREMENTS

Residents who acquired a new DNH directive during the study initiative were determined using the EMR. Subsequent changes in DNH orders, hospitalizations, and deaths were ascertained by retrospective chart review from the date of new DNH through August 5, 2020.

RESULTS

At baseline, 315/581 (54%) of LTC residents did not have a DNH directive. Their mean age was 87 (±9) years and 70% were female. Following ACP discussions, 124/315 (39%) of residents acquired a new DNH directive. Among residents with new DNH directives, 65/124 (52%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 from April 2, 2020 to May 21, 2020. During follow-up, only 6/124 (4.8%) residents had their DNH order reversed, 2/124 (1.6%) residents were hospitalized with illnesses unrelated to COVID-19, and 29/124 (23%) died.

CONCLUSIONS

There was substantial opportunity to increase the proportion of LTC residents with DNH orders during the COVID-19 pandemic through a systematic ACP initiative which utilized real-time EMR data. New directives to avoid hospitalizations were sustained among the majority of residents beyond the peak of the pandemic.

摘要

目的

描述一种在 COVID-19 爆发期间解决预先医疗护理计划(ACP)的系统方法,以及它对长期护理(LTC)居民中新的不入院(DNH)指令发生率的影响。

设计

前瞻性质量改进倡议。

设置

大型学术医疗保健组织内的两个长期慢性护理校园。

参与者

截至 2020 年 4 月 13 日,电子病历(EMR)中没有 DNH 指令的、医疗代理人已激活且缺乏 DNH 指令的 LTC 居民。

干预措施

使用结构化讨论指南,来自各个学科的经过培训的医疗保健人员联系居民的代理人进行以 COVID-19 为重点的 ACP 讨论。有 COVID-19 的没有 DNH 指令的居民被优先考虑。讨论中确定的偏好传达给居民的初级保健团队,并相应地在 EMR 中更新指令。

测量

通过 EMR 确定在研究倡议期间获得新 DNH 指令的居民。通过回顾性图表审查,从新 DNH 日期到 2020 年 8 月 5 日,确定 DNH 订单、住院和死亡的后续变化。

结果

在基线时,581 名 LTC 居民中有 315 名(54%)没有 DNH 指令。他们的平均年龄为 87(±9)岁,其中 70%为女性。进行 ACP 讨论后,315 名居民中有 124 名(39%)获得了新的 DNH 指令。在有新 DNH 指令的居民中,有 65 名(52%)从 2020 年 4 月 2 日至 5 月 21 日被诊断患有 COVID-19。在随访期间,只有 6 名(4.8%)居民的 DNH 指令被推翻,2 名(1.6%)居民因与 COVID-19 无关的疾病住院,29 名(23%)居民死亡。

结论

通过一项利用实时 EMR 数据的系统 ACP 倡议,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,有很大机会增加有 DNH 指令的 LTC 居民的比例。在大流行高峰期过后,大多数居民的新避免住院指令得以维持。

相似文献

1
An advance care planning long-term care initiative in response to COVID-19.针对 COVID-19 的预先护理计划长期护理计划。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Apr;69(4):861-867. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17051. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
2
Changes in Advance Care Planning for Nursing Home Residents During the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间养老院居民的预先护理计划的变化。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Jan;22(1):209-214. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.11.011. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
3
Systematic Advance Care Planning and Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations of Nursing Facility Residents.系统的预先护理计划和可避免的护理院居民住院。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Aug;67(8):1649-1655. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15927. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
4
An Advance Care Planning Video Decision Support Tool for Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.一项针对患有晚期痴呆症的养老院居民的预先护理计划视频决策支持工具:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jul 1;178(7):961-969. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.1506.
5
Effect of advance care planning video on do-not-hospitalize orders for nursing home residents with advanced illness.预先医疗护理计划视频对患有晚期疾病的养老院居民不送医院治疗医嘱的影响。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 8;22(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02970-3.
6
Outcomes of advance care directives after admission to a long-term care home: DNR the DNH?长期护理院入院后预先医疗指示的结果:不复苏?不治疗?
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02699-5.
7
The effect of a social work intervention to enhance advance care planning documentation in the nursing home.一项旨在加强养老院预立医疗计划文件记录的社会工作干预措施的效果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Feb;53(2):290-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53116.x.
8
Are Hospital/ED Transfers Less Likely Among Nursing Home Residents With Do-Not-Hospitalize Orders?对于有“请勿住院”医嘱的养老院居民,医院/急诊科转诊的可能性是否更低?
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 May 1;18(5):438-441. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.004. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
9
Changes in advance care planning in nursing homes before and after the patient Self-Determination Act: report of a 10-state survey.《患者自主决定法案》实施前后养老院预先照护计划的变化:十州调查报告
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Aug;45(8):939-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02963.x.
10
Do-not-resuscitate and do-not-hospitalize directives of persons admitted to skilled nursing facilities under the Medicare benefit.根据医疗保险福利入住专业护理机构的人员的“不要复苏”和“不要住院”指令。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Dec;53(12):2060-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00523.x.

引用本文的文献

1
How Have Quality Improvement Strategies Been Adopted and How Has Impact Been Assessed in Care Homes for Older People? A Systematic Search and Narrative Review.在养老院中,质量改进策略是如何被采用的,以及影响是如何被评估的?一项系统检索与叙述性综述
Int J Older People Nurs. 2025 Sep;20(5):e70036. doi: 10.1111/opn.70036.
2
Situation, Education, Innovation, and Recommendation: A Large-Scale Systematic Review of Advance Care Planning in the Age of COVID-19.现状、教育、创新与建议:COVID-19时代预先护理计划的大规模系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 15;12(6):667. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060667.
3
Advanced care planning in the early phase of COVID-19: a rapid review of the practice and policy lessons learned.2019冠状病毒病早期的高级护理计划:对实践和政策经验教训的快速回顾。
Front Health Serv. 2023 Sep 15;3:1242413. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1242413. eCollection 2023.
4
Palliative Approach to Care Education for Multidisciplinary Staff of Long-Term Care Homes: A Pretest Post-Test Study.长期护理院多学科工作人员姑息治疗护理教育:一项前后测研究
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2023 Feb 22;9:23337214231158470. doi: 10.1177/23337214231158470. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Understanding advance care planning in care homes throughout the COVID-19 pandemic: A critical realist review and synthesis.理解整个 COVID-19 大流行期间养老院中的预先护理计划:关键现实主义的综述与综合。
Palliat Med. 2023 May;37(5):663-676. doi: 10.1177/02692163221137103. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
6
Managing the Impact of COVID-19 in Nursing Homes and Long-Term Care Facilities: An Update.管理新冠疫情对养老院和长期护理机构的影响:最新进展。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Sep;23(9):1590-1602. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.06.028. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
7
Stakeholders' views on priorities essential for establishing a supportive environment for clinical trials in nursing homes.利益相关者对在养老院建立有利于临床试验环境的优先事项的看法。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Apr;70(4):950-959. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17710. Epub 2022 Mar 1.

本文引用的文献

1
A Structured Tool for Communication and Care Planning in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行时代的沟通和护理计划结构化工具。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jul;21(7):943-947. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.062. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
2
Mortality and the Use of Antithrombotic Therapies Among Nursing Home Residents with COVID-19.养老院 COVID-19 患者的死亡率和抗血栓治疗的应用。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68(8):1647-1652. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16664. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
3
Why does COVID-19 disproportionately affect older people?为什么新冠病毒对老年人的影响尤为严重?
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 May 29;12(10):9959-9981. doi: 10.18632/aging.103344.
4
Epidemiology of Covid-19 in a Long-Term Care Facility in King County, Washington.华盛顿州金县长期护理机构中 COVID-19 的流行病学。
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2005-2011. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2005412. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
5
The Importance of Addressing Advance Care Planning and Decisions About Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders During Novel Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19).在2019年新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情期间,重视预先医疗计划及关于不进行心肺复苏医嘱决策的重要性
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1771-1772. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4894.
6
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
7
Nursing Home Characteristics Associated With Implementation of an Advance Care Planning Video Intervention.与实施预先护理计划视频干预相关的养老院特征。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jul;20(7):804-809.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.133. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
8
Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing a Change Initiative in Long-Term Care Using the INTERACT® Quality Improvement Program.使用INTERACT®质量改进计划在长期护理中实施变革举措的障碍与促进因素
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2017 Jul/Sep;36(3):219-230. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000168.
9
An Interim Analysis of an Advance Care Planning Intervention in the Nursing Home Setting.养老院中预先医疗指示干预的中期分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Nov;64(11):2385-2392. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14463. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
10
The Effects of Advance Care Planning Interventions on Nursing Home Residents: A Systematic Review.预先护理计划干预对养老院居民的影响:一项系统评价
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Apr 1;17(4):284-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.12.017. Epub 2016 Feb 6.