Suppr超能文献

术中计算机断层扫描辅助下的颈椎后路器械导航:不同病变和螺钉类型的准确性前瞻性研究。

Intraoperative Computed Tomography-Assisted Spinal Navigation in Dorsal Cervical Instrumentation: A Prospective Study on Accuracy Regarding Different Pathologies and Screw Types.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2021 May;149:e378-e385. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) navigated dorsal instrumentation has been successfully introduced as a new clinical standard. The proximity of vital anatomic structures makes cervical spine instrumentation an especially delicate task. Therefore, navigated approaches might prove to be beneficial. In this study, the accuracy of conventional instrumentation was compared with iCT navigated dorsal cervical spine instrumentation with focus on cervical pedicle screws (CPSs) versus lateral mass screws (LMSs) and pathologies.

METHODS

We analyzed a prospective consecutive series of patients undergoing cervical dorsal instrumentation with iCT and spinal navigation and retrospectively analyzed a cohort that received conventional cervical instrumentation with C-arm fluoroscopy (control group). Accuracy was assessed with a modified Gertzbein-Robbins classification. Underlying pathologies were taken into account regarding accuracy in different entities.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were treated using iCT (357 screws: 238 CPSs, 119 LMSs), and 98 patients underwent conventional instrumentation (632 screws: 69 CPSs, 563 LMSs). We achieved an initial accuracy of 93.28% (n = 220 screws) in the iCT group and 80.9% (n = 511 screws) in the control group (P < 0.001). Significant differences were found regarding the accuracy of CPS placement in cases of degenerative disorders (iCT vs. control; 94% vs. 63%; P < 0.001) and trauma (iCT vs. control; 88% vs. 72%; P < 0.05). iCT yielded favorable precision rates in regard to LMS placement (iCT vs. control; 94.2% vs. 82%; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Accuracy of iCT navigated instrumentation was significantly higher than conventional instrumentation. An overall tendency toward the use of CPSs with iCT navigation is evident, increasing the mechanical properties of the construct. iCT appears to be especially beneficial in elective surgery cases of degenerative spinal disorders.

摘要

背景

术中计算机断层扫描(iCT)导航的背侧器械已成功引入作为一种新的临床标准。由于紧邻重要的解剖结构,颈椎器械固定术是一项特别精细的任务。因此,导航方法可能会证明是有益的。在这项研究中,我们比较了传统器械与 iCT 导航背侧颈椎器械的准确性,重点关注颈椎椎弓根螺钉(CPS)与侧块螺钉(LMS)和病变。

方法

我们分析了一组接受 iCT 和脊柱导航的颈椎背侧器械的前瞻性连续患者系列,并回顾性分析了接受 C 臂透视常规颈椎器械的患者队列(对照组)。准确性采用改良的 Gertzbein-Robbins 分类进行评估。考虑到不同实体中的准确性,对基础病变进行了分类。

结果

59 例患者接受 iCT 治疗(357 枚螺钉:238 枚 CPS,119 枚 LMS),98 例患者接受常规器械治疗(632 枚螺钉:69 枚 CPS,563 枚 LMS)。在 iCT 组中,初始准确性为 93.28%(n=220 枚螺钉),在对照组中为 80.9%(n=511 枚螺钉)(P<0.001)。在退行性疾病(iCT 与对照组;94%与 63%;P<0.001)和创伤(iCT 与对照组;88%与 72%;P<0.05)的情况下,CPS 放置的准确性存在显著差异。iCT 在 LMS 放置方面具有较好的精度(iCT 与对照组;94.2%与 82%;P<0.05)。

结论

iCT 导航器械的准确性明显高于传统器械。iCT 导航中 CPS 的使用总体呈上升趋势,提高了结构的机械性能。iCT 似乎在退行性脊柱疾病的择期手术中特别有益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验