Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia.
Department of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Extension Education, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Prev Vet Med. 2021 Apr;189:105291. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105291. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
Bovine brucellosis is a neglected zoonotic disease prevalent in several developing countries including India. It has been successfully controlled in many developed countries by using vaccination in conjunction with extensive surveillance and test-and-cull approaches, but some of these approaches do not suit Indian culture and norms. This study was conducted to investigate the feasibility and social acceptability of various bovine brucellosis control strategies in India. Focus group discussions and key-informant interviews were conducted with veterinarians, para-veterinarians, veterinary academics, farmers and other stakeholders. Vaccination with the Brucella strain 19 vaccine was considered feasible, but the participants were concerned about the risk of self-inoculation, the inability to vaccinate pregnant and male animals, the difficulty to differentiate vaccinated from diseased animals and the challenges of maintaining the vaccine cold chain in India. As expected, the test-and-cull approach was not considered feasible as cattle are considered sacred by Hindus and their slaughter is banned in most states. Although the test-and-segregation approach appears reasonable in theory, it would have low acceptability, if implemented without providing any compensation to farmers. Negligible biosecurity was implemented by farmers: almost no biosecurity procedures were performed for visitors entering a farm, and testing of animals was rarely undertaken before introducing them to a farm. However, the participants considered that improving biosecurity would be more acceptable and feasible than both the test-and-cull and the test-and-segregation approaches. Similarly, inadequate personal protection was used by veterinary personnel for handling parturition, retention of placenta and abortion cases; this was considered as another area of possible improvement. Farmers and veterinarians expressed serious concerns about stray cattle as many of them could potentially be infected with brucellosis, and thus could spread the infection between farms. This study recommends using vaccination and biosecurity along with some ancillary strategies to control brucellosis in India. Information from the study could be used to develop an evidence-based disease control program for the disease in the country.
牛布鲁氏菌病是一种被忽视的人畜共患疾病,在包括印度在内的几个发展中国家流行。许多发达国家通过接种疫苗结合广泛的监测和检测与淘汰方法成功地控制了该病,但这些方法中的一些并不适合印度的文化和规范。本研究旨在探讨在印度实施各种牛布鲁氏菌病控制策略的可行性和社会可接受性。采用焦点小组讨论和关键知情人访谈的方法,对兽医、兽医助理、兽医学者、农民和其他利益相关者进行了调查。用布鲁氏菌 19 号疫苗进行免疫接种被认为是可行的,但参与者担心存在自我接种的风险、无法对怀孕和雄性动物进行免疫接种、难以区分免疫接种动物和患病动物以及在印度维持疫苗冷链的挑战。不出所料,检测与淘汰方法被认为不可行,因为牛在印度教中被视为神圣,在大多数邦禁止屠宰。尽管从理论上讲,检测与隔离方法似乎合理,但如果不向农民提供任何补偿,实施该方法的接受程度将很低。农民几乎没有实施任何生物安全措施:几乎没有对进入农场的访客采取任何生物安全措施,而且在将动物引入农场之前很少对其进行检测。然而,参与者认为,与检测与淘汰和检测与隔离方法相比,提高生物安全措施更具可接受性和可行性。同样,兽医人员在处理分娩、胎衣滞留和流产病例时,使用的个人防护措施也不足;这被认为是另一个可能改进的领域。农民和兽医对流浪牛表示严重关切,因为其中许多牛可能感染了布鲁氏菌病,从而可能在农场之间传播感染。本研究建议在印度使用疫苗接种和生物安全措施以及一些辅助策略来控制布鲁氏菌病。本研究的结果可用于为该国制定基于证据的疾病控制计划。