• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特发性膜性肾病的免疫抑制治疗:一项更新的网状Meta分析。

Immunosuppressive treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: An updated network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Bao Neng, Gu Mingjia, Yu Xiang, Wang Jin, Gao Leiping, Miao Zhiwei, Kong Wei

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 157 Daming Road, Nanjing City, Jiangsu, 210000, PR China.

Department of Nephrology, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 6 Huanghe Road, Changshu City, Jiangsu, 215500, PR China.

出版信息

Open Life Sci. 2023 Jan 10;18(1):20220527. doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0527. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1515/biol-2022-0527
PMID:36694696
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9835199/
Abstract

This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of different pharmacological treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). Thirty-four relevant studies were extracted from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database, and MEDLINE. Treatment with tacrolimus (TAC), cyclophosphamide (CTX), mycophenolate mofetil, chlorambucil (CHL), cyclosporin A (CSA), steroids, rituximab (RTX), and conservative therapy were compared. Outcomes were measured using remission rate and incidence of side effects. Summary estimates were expressed as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The quality of findings was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. In the direct meta-analysis for comparison of complete remission (CR) rate, the curative effect of RTX is inferior to CTX (OR 0.37; CI 0.18, 0.75). In the NMA of CR rate, the results showed that the curative effects of CTX, CHL, and TAC were significantly higher than those of the control group. The efficacy of RTX is not inferior to the CTX (OR 0.81; CI 0.32, 2.01), and the level of evidence was moderate; CSA was not as effective as RTX, and the difference was statistically significant with moderate evidence (OR 2.98, CI 1.00, 8.91). In summary, we recommend CTX and RTX as the first-line drug for IMN treatment.

摘要

这项网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在研究不同药物治疗特发性膜性肾病(IMN)的疗效和安全性。从PubMed、Embase、Cochrane数据库和MEDLINE中提取了34项相关研究。比较了他克莫司(TAC)、环磷酰胺(CTX)、霉酚酸酯、苯丁酸氮芥(CHL)、环孢素A(CSA)、类固醇、利妥昔单抗(RTX)和保守治疗的效果。使用缓解率和副作用发生率来衡量结果。汇总估计值以比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CIs)表示。采用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价方法对研究结果的质量进行评估。在直接荟萃分析中比较完全缓解(CR)率时,RTX的疗效低于CTX(OR 0.37;CI 0.18,0.75)。在CR率的NMA中,结果显示CTX、CHL和TAC的疗效显著高于对照组。RTX的疗效不低于CTX(OR 0.81;CI 0.32,2.01),证据水平为中等;CSA不如RTX有效,差异具有统计学意义,证据水平为中等(OR 2.98,CI 1.00,8.91)。总之,我们推荐CTX和RTX作为IMN治疗的一线药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/6e6a86620468/j_biol-2022-0527-fig009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/18518b98aa85/j_biol-2022-0527-fig001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/95d7b8125f86/j_biol-2022-0527-fig002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/374c411b715c/j_biol-2022-0527-fig003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/bbcd8c2986d2/j_biol-2022-0527-fig004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/4e1e2aee5c77/j_biol-2022-0527-fig005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/28e16218748b/j_biol-2022-0527-fig006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/b79f6495746f/j_biol-2022-0527-fig007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/977ca8b6c955/j_biol-2022-0527-fig008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/6e6a86620468/j_biol-2022-0527-fig009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/18518b98aa85/j_biol-2022-0527-fig001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/95d7b8125f86/j_biol-2022-0527-fig002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/374c411b715c/j_biol-2022-0527-fig003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/bbcd8c2986d2/j_biol-2022-0527-fig004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/4e1e2aee5c77/j_biol-2022-0527-fig005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/28e16218748b/j_biol-2022-0527-fig006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/b79f6495746f/j_biol-2022-0527-fig007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/977ca8b6c955/j_biol-2022-0527-fig008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ad/9835199/6e6a86620468/j_biol-2022-0527-fig009.jpg

相似文献

1
Immunosuppressive treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: An updated network meta-analysis.特发性膜性肾病的免疫抑制治疗:一项更新的网状Meta分析。
Open Life Sci. 2023 Jan 10;18(1):20220527. doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0527. eCollection 2023.
2
Comparative efficacy of 13 immunosuppressive agents for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较 13 种免疫抑制剂治疗成人肾病综合征特发性膜性肾病的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 11;9(9):e030919. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030919.
3
Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy versus cyclophosphamide-corticosteroid combination therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis.他克莫司单药治疗与环磷酰胺 - 皮质类固醇联合治疗特发性膜性肾病的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 16;100(28):e26628. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026628.
4
Comparative effectiveness and tolerance of immunosuppressive treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis.特发性膜性肾病免疫抑制治疗的比较有效性和耐受性:一项网状Meta分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 12;12(9):e0184398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184398. eCollection 2017.
5
Efficacy and cost of different treatment in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.特发性膜性肾病患者不同治疗方法的疗效和成本:一项网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2021 May;94:107376. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107376. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
6
Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus vs cyclophosphamide in the therapy of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a meta-analysis.他克莫司与环磷酰胺治疗特发性膜性肾病患者的疗效及安全性:一项荟萃分析
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019 Jul 3;13:2179-2186. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S209211. eCollection 2019.
7
Tacrolimus versus cyclophosphamide for patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy and treated with steroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.他克莫司与环磷酰胺治疗激素治疗的特发性膜性肾病患者的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ren Fail. 2021 Dec;43(1):840-850. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2021.1914655.
8
Efficacy and safety of 12 immunosuppressive agents for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults: A pairwise and network meta-analysis.12种免疫抑制剂治疗成人特发性膜性肾病的疗效与安全性:一项成对和网状荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 25;13:917532. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.917532. eCollection 2022.
9
A comparison of cyclophosphamide versus tacrolimus in terms of treatment effect for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis.环磷酰胺与他克莫司治疗特发性膜性肾病的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2019 May-Jun;39(3):269-276. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2018.10.008. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
10
Immunosuppressive treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome.成人肾病综合征特发性膜性肾病的免疫抑制治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 16;2014(10):CD004293. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004293.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Fractional excretion of total protein predicts renal prognosis in Japanese patients with primary membranous nephropathy.总蛋白排泄分数可预测日本原发性膜性肾病患者的肾脏预后。
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Mar 20;17(5):sfae071. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae071. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Is There a Place for Apheresis in the Management of Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy? A Report of Three Cases and Literature Review.单采术在特发性膜性肾病治疗中是否有一席之地?三例报告及文献综述
J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 26;14(3):249. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030249.

本文引用的文献

1
KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases.KDIGO 2021肾小球疾病管理临床实践指南。
Kidney Int. 2021 Oct;100(4S):S1-S276. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.021.
2
Rituximab in Membranous Nephropathy.利妥昔单抗治疗膜性肾病
Kidney Int Rep. 2021 Jan 13;6(4):881-893. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.12.035. eCollection 2021 Apr.
3
Rituximab or Cyclophosphamide in the Treatment of Membranous Nephropathy: The RI-CYCLO Randomized Trial.利妥昔单抗或环磷酰胺治疗膜性肾病:RI-CYCLO随机试验
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Apr;32(4):972-982. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020071091. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
4
Efficacy and cost of different treatment in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.特发性膜性肾病患者不同治疗方法的疗效和成本:一项网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2021 May;94:107376. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107376. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
5
The STARMEN trial indicates that alternating treatment with corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide is superior to sequential treatment with tacrolimus and rituximab in primary membranous nephropathy.STARMEN 试验表明,在原发性膜性肾病中,与他克莫司和利妥昔单抗序贯治疗相比,皮质类固醇和环磷酰胺交替治疗更具优势。
Kidney Int. 2021 Apr;99(4):986-998. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.10.014. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
6
Comparative efficacy of 13 immunosuppressive agents for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较 13 种免疫抑制剂治疗成人肾病综合征特发性膜性肾病的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 11;9(9):e030919. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030919.
7
Rituximab or Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Membranous Nephropathy.利妥昔单抗或环孢素治疗膜性肾病。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 4;381(1):36-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814427.
8
Risk of infection with different immunosuppressive drugs combined with glucocorticoids for the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A pairwise and network meta-analysis.治疗特发性膜性肾病时,联合使用不同免疫抑制剂与糖皮质激素治疗的感染风险:一项基于配对和网络的荟萃分析。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2019 May;70:354-361. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
9
GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: addressing incoherence.网状meta 分析中评估一致性的 GRADE 方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;108:77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.025. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
10
GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: avoiding spurious judgments of imprecision in sparse networks.基于 GRADE 方法对网状meta 分析的一致性进行评估:避免在稀疏网络中对不精确性产生错误判断。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;105:60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.08.022. Epub 2018 Sep 22.