Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, 12222, USA.
Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80526, USA.
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Aug;104(8):1834-1859. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.024. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
In response to COVID-19, we conducted a rapid review of risk communication interventions to mitigate risk from viruses to determine if such interventions are efficacious.
We searched for risk communication interventions in four databases: Medline, PsycInfo, the ProQuest Coronavirus Research Database, and CENTRAL. The search produced 1572 articles. Thirty-one articles were included in the final review.
Results showed risk communication interventions can produce cognitive and behavior changes around viruses. Results were more consistently positive for interventions focused on HIV/AIDS as compared to influenza. There was no consistent best intervention approach when comparing peer health, audio/visual, and intensive multi-media interventions. Tailoring risk communication toward a target population, in comparison to not tailoring, was related to better outcomes.
The results suggest that risk communication interventions can be efficacious at reducing risk from viruses. They also highlight the complexity of risk communication interventions. Additional research is needed to understand the mechanisms that lead risk communication to reduce risk from viruses.
Results support risk communication interventions to reduce risk from viruses.
针对 COVID-19,我们对风险沟通干预措施进行了快速审查,以减轻病毒带来的风险,确定这些干预措施是否有效。
我们在四个数据库中搜索风险沟通干预措施:Medline、PsycInfo、ProQuest 冠状病毒研究数据库和 CENTRAL。搜索产生了 1572 篇文章。最终审查纳入了 31 篇文章。
结果表明,风险沟通干预措施可以在病毒周围产生认知和行为上的变化。与流感相比,针对 HIV/AIDS 的干预措施的结果更为一致地呈阳性。在比较同伴健康、音频/视频和强化多媒体干预措施时,没有一致的最佳干预方法。与不针对特定人群相比,针对特定目标人群的风险沟通干预措施与更好的结果相关。
结果表明,风险沟通干预措施可以有效地降低病毒带来的风险。它们还突出了风险沟通干预措施的复杂性。需要进一步研究以了解导致风险沟通降低病毒风险的机制。
结果支持风险沟通干预措施以降低病毒带来的风险。