• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高社区对 COVID-19 预防措施的依从性:政策证据摘要。

Improving the adherence to COVID-19 preventive measures in the community: Evidence brief for policy.

机构信息

Graduate Course in Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sorocaba, Sorocaba, Brazil.

Fiocruz School of Government, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Brasília, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 1;10:894958. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.894958. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.894958
PMID:35979464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9376604/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify evidence-based strategies to improve adherence to the preventive measures against the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) at the community level.

METHOD

This is an evidence brief for policy, combining research evidence specific to contextual knowledge from stakeholders. A systematic search was performed in 18 electronic databases, gray literature, and a handle search, including only secondary and tertiary studies that focused on the adherence of the general population to COVID-19 preventive measures in the community. Two reviewers, independently, performed the study selection, data extraction, and assessment of the quality of the studies. Relevant evidence has been synthesized to draft evidence-based strategies to improve adherence. These strategies were circulated for external endorsement by stakeholders and final refinement. Endorsement rates >80%, 60-80% and <60% were considered high, moderate, and low respectively.

RESULTS

Eleven studies, with varying methodological qualities were included: high ( = 3), moderate ( = 3), low ( = 1), and critically low ( = 4). Three evidence based strategies were identified: i. Risk communication; ii. Health education to the general public, and iii. Financial support and access to essential supplies and services. The rates of endorsement were: 83% for risk communication, 83% for health education, and 92% for financial support and access to essential supplies and services. The evidence showed that an increase in knowledge, transparent communication, and public awareness about the risks of COVID-19 and the benefits of adopting preventive measures results in changes in people's attitudes and behavior, which can increase adherence. In addition, the guarantee of support and assistance provides conditions for people to adopt and sustain such measures.

CONCLUSIONS

These strategies can guide future actions and the formulation of public policies to improve adherence to preventive measures in the community during the current COVID-19 pandemic and other epidemics.

摘要

目的

确定在社区层面提高预防冠状病毒病(COVID-19)措施依从性的循证策略。

方法

这是一份针对政策的证据摘要,结合了针对利益相关者的背景知识的研究证据。在 18 个电子数据库、灰色文献和处理搜索中进行了系统搜索,仅纳入了关注社区中普通人群对 COVID-19 预防措施的依从性的二级和三级研究。两名审查员独立进行了研究选择、数据提取和研究质量评估。综合了相关证据,以起草提高依从性的循证策略。这些策略已分发给利益相关者进行外部认可和最终完善。认可率>80%、60-80%和<60%分别被认为是高、中、低。

结果

纳入了 11 项研究,其方法学质量各不相同:高(=3)、中(=3)、低(=1)和极低(=4)。确定了三项循证策略:i.风险沟通;ii.向公众进行健康教育;iii.财政支持和获得基本用品和服务。认可率分别为:风险沟通 83%、健康教育 83%、财政支持和获得基本用品和服务 92%。证据表明,增加对 COVID-19 风险和采取预防措施的益处的了解、透明沟通和公众意识会导致人们的态度和行为发生变化,从而提高依从性。此外,保障支持和援助为人们采取和维持这些措施提供了条件。

结论

这些策略可以指导未来的行动和公共政策的制定,以提高当前 COVID-19 大流行和其他流行病期间社区预防措施的依从性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9785/9376604/66413167880b/fpubh-10-894958-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9785/9376604/cf6f69b15645/fpubh-10-894958-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9785/9376604/66413167880b/fpubh-10-894958-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9785/9376604/cf6f69b15645/fpubh-10-894958-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9785/9376604/66413167880b/fpubh-10-894958-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving the adherence to COVID-19 preventive measures in the community: Evidence brief for policy.提高社区对 COVID-19 预防措施的依从性:政策证据摘要。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 1;10:894958. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.894958. eCollection 2022.
2
International travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.国际旅行相关防控措施以遏制 COVID-19 大流行:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 25;3(3):CD013717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013717.pub2.
3
The Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic Policy on Social Needs Across the State of Kansas and Western Missouri: Paired Survey Response Testing.新冠疫情政策对堪萨斯州和密苏里州西部地区社会需求的影响:配对调查响应测试。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Apr 25;9:e41369. doi: 10.2196/41369.
4
Impact of the eHealth literacy, knowledge and attitudes on COVID-19 prevention behavior among residents in the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study in Anhui Province, China.新冠肺炎大流行第二年居民的电子健康素养、知识和态度对新冠病毒预防行为的影响:中国安徽省的一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 2;10:1015803. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1015803. eCollection 2022.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
A comprehensive review of prioritised interventions to improve the health and wellbeing of persons with lived experience of homelessness.对改善有过无家可归经历者的健康和福祉的优先干预措施的全面综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 24;17(2):e1154. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1154. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review.在疾病爆发、流行或大流行期间及之后,为支持一线卫生和社会护理专业人员的适应能力和心理健康所采取的干预措施:一项混合方法的系统评价
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11(11):CD013779. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013779.
8
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
9
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
10
International assessment of the link between COVID-19 related attitudes, concerns and behaviours in relation to public health policies: optimising policy strategies to improve health, economic and quality of life outcomes (the iCARE Study).国际评估与公共卫生政策相关的 COVID-19 相关态度、关注和行为之间的联系:优化政策策略以改善健康、经济和生活质量结果(iCARE 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 11;11(3):e046127. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046127.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Two Years after the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed Methods Study.新冠疫情爆发两年后的知识、态度和行为:一项混合方法研究。
J Nurs Manag. 2024 Feb 16;2024:6636649. doi: 10.1155/2024/6636649. eCollection 2024.
2
Higher interest to continue COVID-19 practice recommendations in non-pandemic times among German GPs with better crisis leadership skills (egePan study).德国具有更好危机领导能力的全科医生在非大流行时期更有兴趣继续实施 COVID-19 实践建议(egePan 研究)。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 13;24(1):1396. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11855-7.
3
Qualitative research on undergraduate nursing students' recognition and response to short videos' health disinformation.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Germany: a cross-sectional, population-based study.德国 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫的预测因素:一项横断面、基于人群的研究。
Postgrad Med J. 2022 Oct 1;98(1164):756-764. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-141365.
2
RETRACTED: COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Resistance in India Explored through a Population-Based Longitudinal Survey.已撤回:通过一项基于人群的纵向调查探索印度对新冠疫苗的犹豫和抵触情绪。
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Sep 24;9(10):1064. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9101064.
3
Prophylaxis against covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis.
本科护理专业学生对短视频健康虚假信息的认知与应对的质性研究
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 31;10(15):e35455. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35455. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
4
Health and non-health benefits and equity impacts of individual-level economic relief programs during epidemics/pandemics in high income settings: a scoping review.高收入国家在传染病/大流行期间实施的个人经济救助计划的健康和非健康效益及公平影响:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):2106. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19493-8.
针对 COVID-19 的预防措施:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2021 Apr 26;373:n949. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n949.
4
A living WHO guideline on drugs to prevent covid-19.一份关于用药物预防新冠病毒的在世世界卫生组织指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 1;372:n526. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n526.
5
Rapid review of virus risk communication interventions: Directions for COVID-19.病毒风险沟通干预措施快速回顾:COVID-19 方向。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Aug;104(8):1834-1859. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.024. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
6
Social influence matters: We follow pandemic guidelines most when our close circle does.社会影响力很重要:当我们的亲密圈子遵守防疫指南时,我们最有可能遵守防疫指南。
Br J Psychol. 2021 Aug;112(3):763-780. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12491. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
7
Community interventions in Low-And Middle-Income Countries to inform COVID-19 control implementation decisions in Kenya: A rapid systematic review.社区干预在中低收入国家为肯尼亚的 COVID-19 控制实施决策提供信息:一项快速系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 8;15(12):e0242403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242403. eCollection 2020.
8
Protective behaviors for COVID-19 among Brazilian adults and elderly living with multimorbidity: the ELSI-COVID-19 initiative.巴西成年人和患有多种慢性病的老年人预防 COVID-19 的保护行为:ELSI-COVID-19 倡议。
Cad Saude Publica. 2020 Nov 13;36Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e00196120. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00196120. eCollection 2020.
9
Adherence to physical contact restriction measures and the spread of COVID-19 in Brazil.巴西对身体接触限制措施的遵守情况与新冠病毒病的传播
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2020 Nov 6;29(5):e2020432. doi: 10.1590/S1679-49742020000500018. eCollection 2020.
10
Non-pharmaceutical interventions for containment, mitigation and suppression of COVID-19 infection.用于遏制、缓解和抑制2019冠状病毒病感染的非药物干预措施。
Colomb Med (Cali). 2020 Jun 30;51(2):e4266. doi: 10.25100/cm.v51i2.4266.