Suppr超能文献

磷酸钠片与聚乙二醇溶液用于韩国健康成年人肠道准备的疗效及安全性比较

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sodium phosphate tablets and polyethylene glycol solution for bowel cleansing in healthy Korean adults.

作者信息

Lee Seung-Hwa, Lee Duck-Joo, Kim Kwang-Min, Seo Sang-Wook, Kang Joon-Koo, Lee Eun-Hye, Lee Dong-Ryul

机构信息

Health Promotion Center, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.

Department of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2014 Nov;55(6):1542-55. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.6.1542.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Bowel cleansing is generally regarded as time-consuming and unpleasant among patients. Patients commonly state that bowel preparation provokes more discomfort than the actual colonoscopic examination. The purpose of this study was to compare two regimens of sodium phosphate (NaP) tablets versus polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution for bowel preparation in healthy Korean adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single center, prospective, open-label, investigator-blinded, randomized, controlled-pilot study. A total of 62 healthy Korean subjects were randomly assigned to two groups (NaP vs. PEG). Efficacy, safety, and patient-related outcomes, as well as procedural parameters, were evaluated.

RESULTS

Although there were no significant differences in total Ottawa bowel quality score, fluid scores and the rate of adequate bowel preparation were significantly better in the NaP group than the PEG group. Additionally, the NaP group showed better results regarding patient tolerance, satisfaction, preference, and rate of adverse events than the PEG group. Significant fluctuations in specific serum electrolytes were common and of a greater magnitude in the NaP group than the PEG group. However, these abnormalities were transient and did not result in serious complications and side effects.

CONCLUSION

In this study, NaP tablets were shown to be an effective, well-tolerated, and acceptable regimen for bowel preparation. Also, our study suggests that NaP tablets may be safe and can be used as a bowel cleansing agent in healthy adults undergoing elective colonoscopy. Further multicenter, large scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

目的

在患者中,肠道清洁通常被认为既耗时又令人不适。患者普遍表示肠道准备引起的不适比实际结肠镜检查更多。本研究的目的是比较两种磷酸钠(NaP)片方案与聚乙二醇(PEG)溶液用于健康韩国成年人肠道准备的效果。

材料与方法

这是一项单中心、前瞻性、开放标签、研究者设盲、随机、对照试点研究。总共62名健康韩国受试者被随机分为两组(NaP组与PEG组)。评估了疗效、安全性、患者相关结局以及操作参数。

结果

尽管渥太华肠道总体质量评分无显著差异,但NaP组的液体评分和充分肠道准备率显著优于PEG组。此外,NaP组在患者耐受性、满意度、偏好和不良事件发生率方面的结果优于PEG组。特定血清电解质的显著波动很常见,且NaP组比PEG组的波动幅度更大。然而,这些异常是短暂的,未导致严重并发症和副作用。

结论

在本研究中,NaP片被证明是一种有效、耐受性良好且可接受的肠道准备方案。此外,我们的研究表明NaP片可能是安全的,可用于接受择期结肠镜检查的健康成年人作为肠道清洁剂。需要进一步的多中心、大规模研究来证实这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6d3/4205693/30aac2608e28/ymj-55-1542-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验