Mestre-Bach Gemma, Fernández-Aranda Fernando, Jiménez-Murcia Susana, Potenza Marc N
Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, La Rioja, Spain.
Department of Psychiatry. Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain.
Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2020 Sep;7(3):97-108. doi: 10.1007/s40473-020-00212-7. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
The present review attempts to provide a comprehensive and critical overview of the neurocognitive mechanisms of gambling disorder (GD), problematic pornography use (PPU) and binge-eating disorder (BED), focusing specifically on decision-making processes.
GD, PPU and BED have been associated with decision-making impairments both under risk and ambiguity. Features such as intelligence, emotions, social variables, cognitive distortions, comorbidities, or arousal may condition decision-making processes in these individuals.
Impairments in decision-making seem to be a shared transdiagnostic feature of these disorders We also hypothesized the EG relative to the NEG group would demonstrate weaker relationships between problem-gambling severity and health/functioning measures (e.g., substance use) and gambling behaviors (e.g., more time spent gambling) given that EG would account for some of the variance in the relationships between ARPG and these measures. However, there is varying support for the degree to which different features may affect decision-making. Therefore, the study of decision-making processes can provide crucial evidence for understanding addictions and other disorders with addiction-like symptomatology.
本综述旨在对赌博障碍(GD)、问题性色情制品使用(PPU)和暴饮暴食障碍(BED)的神经认知机制进行全面且批判性的概述,特别关注决策过程。
GD、PPU和BED与风险和模糊情境下的决策障碍有关。智力、情绪、社会变量、认知扭曲、共病或唤醒等特征可能影响这些个体的决策过程。
决策障碍似乎是这些障碍的一个共同的跨诊断特征。我们还假设,相对于非问题赌徒组,问题赌徒组在问题赌博严重程度与健康/功能指标(如物质使用)以及赌博行为(如赌博时间更长)之间的关系会更弱,因为问题赌徒组会解释病理性赌博与这些指标之间关系的部分差异。然而,对于不同特征可能影响决策的程度,研究结果并不一致。因此,对决策过程的研究可为理解成瘾及其他有成瘾样症状的障碍提供关键证据。