Rotărescu Violeta Stefania, Matei Diana Bianca, Mircea Ioana Alexandra, Mirescu Andreea Maria, Nedelescu Bogdan George, Nedelea Daniela Georgiana, Raluca Neagu Alexandra Nicoleta, Necşulescu Alexandru George, Oteşanu Gabriel Angelo, Tudor Lucian Constantin
Memory Laboratory, University of Bucharest, Romania.
Res Psychother. 2021 Jan 14;23(3):496. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2020.496. eCollection 2020 Dec 31.
In the unique context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, researchers and clinicians alike drew attention to the risks involved by physical and social isolation for mental health. Factors like resilience, gender, urban/rural environment, or preexisting anxiety can impact anxious states produced by home forced isolation. Based on these, we assumed that: i) there are significant differences in the level of anxiety (state) during the pandemic, depending on the living area of the subjects; ii) gender plays a moderating role in the relationship between resilience and anxiety; and iii) anxiety (trait), experiential avoidance, resilience, and family connectedness, determine the level of anxiety (state). The MemoryLab team conducted the present study on 495 subjects (n=411 women, age between 18 and 65). Of these, 350 live in large and medium urban areas, 63 in small urban areas, and 82 in rural areas. As instruments, we used The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI 2.0), The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire 2 (AAQ-2), The Aggression Questionnaire (AQ), The Family Connectedness Questionnaire, and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10 (CD-RISC-10), as well as the standard division of living areas according to community size. Data collection took place online during the spring peak of the pandemic. According to ANOVA analysis, people living in small urban areas have a higher level of anxiety. The difference is significant compared to those living in large and medium cities and villages. Gender has no moderating role in the relationship between resilience and the anxiety state. Also, experiential avoidance, anxiety (trait), and resilience play a significant role on the level of anxiety (state), measured during social isolation. The results could be an important indicator for understanding psychological mechanisms guiding interventions to support the communities effectively.
在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的独特背景下,研究人员和临床医生都关注到身体和社会隔离对心理健康所带来的风险。诸如心理韧性、性别、城乡环境或既往焦虑等因素,会影响因居家强制隔离而产生的焦虑状态。基于此,我们假设:i)在大流行期间,焦虑(状态)水平存在显著差异,这取决于受试者的居住区域;ii)性别在心理韧性与焦虑的关系中起调节作用;iii)焦虑(特质)、经验性回避、心理韧性和家庭联结度,决定焦虑(状态)水平。MemoryLab团队对495名受试者(n = 411名女性,年龄在18至65岁之间)进行了本研究。其中,350人生活在大中城市地区,63人生活在小城市地区,82人生活在农村地区。作为研究工具,我们使用了状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI 2.0)、接受与行动问卷2(AAQ-2)、攻击问卷(AQ)、家庭联结度问卷、康纳-戴维森心理韧性量表10(CD-RISC-10),以及根据社区规模对居住区域进行的标准划分。数据收集在大流行春季高峰期通过线上方式进行。根据方差分析,生活在小城市地区的人焦虑水平更高。与生活在大中城市和农村的人相比,这种差异具有显著性。性别在心理韧性与焦虑状态的关系中不起调节作用。此外,经验性回避、焦虑(特质)和心理韧性,在社交隔离期间所测量的焦虑(状态)水平上发挥着重要作用。这些结果可能是理解指导干预措施以有效支持社区的心理机制的重要指标。