Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Mar;272:113751. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113751. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
The war in Yemen, described as the world's 'worst humanitarian crisis,' has seen numerous attacks against health care. While global attention to attacks on health workers has increased significantly over the past decade, gaps in research on the lived experiences of frontline staff persist. This study draws on perspectives of frontline health workers in Yemen to understand the impact of the ongoing conflict on their personal and professional lives. Forty-three facility-based health worker interviews, and 6 focus group discussions with community-based health workers and midwives were conducted in Sana'a, Aden and Taiz governorates at the peak of the Yemen conflict. Data were analysed using content analysis methods. Findings highlight the extent and range of violence confronting health workers in Yemen as well as the coping strategies they use to attenuate the impact of acute and chronic stressors resulting from conflict. We find that the complex security situation - characterized by multiple parties to the conflict, politicization of humanitarian aid and constraints in humanitarian access - was coupled with everyday stressors that prevented health workers from carrying out their work. Participants reported sporadic attacks by armed civilians, tensions with patients, and harassment at checkpoints. Working conditions were dire, and participants reported chronic suspension of salaries as well as serious shortages of essential supplies and medicines. Themes specific to coping centered around fatalism and religious motivation, resourcefulness and innovation, and sense of duty and patriotism. Our findings demonstrate that health workers experience substantial stress and face various pressures while delivering lifesaving services in Yemen. While they exhibit considerable resilience and coping, they have needs that remain largely unaddressed. Accordingly, the humanitarian community should direct more attention to responding to the mental health and psychosocial needs of health workers, while actively working to ameliorate the conditions in which they work.
也门战争被描述为世界上“最严重的人道主义危机”,其间发生了众多针对医疗保健的袭击事件。尽管过去十年中,全球对袭击卫生工作者事件的关注度显著提高,但对一线工作人员实际经历的研究仍存在差距。本研究借鉴也门一线卫生工作者的观点,以了解持续冲突对他们个人和职业生活的影响。在也门冲突高峰期,我们在萨那、亚丁和塔伊兹省的医疗机构中进行了 43 次基于机构的卫生工作者访谈和 6 次基于社区的卫生工作者和助产士焦点小组讨论。我们使用内容分析方法对数据进行了分析。研究结果突显了也门卫生工作者所面临的暴力程度和范围,以及他们为减轻因冲突而产生的急性和慢性压力源的影响而采用的应对策略。我们发现,复杂的安全局势——其特点是冲突多方、人道主义援助的政治化以及人道主义准入的限制——与日常压力源相结合,使卫生工作者无法开展工作。参与者报告说,他们偶尔会受到武装平民的袭击、与病人产生紧张关系以及在检查站受到骚扰。工作条件恶劣,参与者报告说工资长期停发,基本用品和药品严重短缺。应对主题主要集中在宿命论和宗教动机、足智多谋和创新以及责任感和爱国主义上。我们的研究结果表明,也门的卫生工作者在提供救生服务时承受着巨大的压力,面临着各种压力。虽然他们表现出了相当的韧性和应对能力,但他们的需求在很大程度上仍未得到满足。因此,人道主义界应更加关注满足卫生工作者的心理健康和社会心理需求,同时积极努力改善他们的工作条件。