Section of Radiology - BiND, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop St, UPMC Presbyterian Suite 200, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Eur Radiol. 2021 Sep;31(9):6868-6878. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07743-x. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
To evaluate targetoid appearance on T2-weighted imaging and signs of tumor vascular involvement as potential new LI-RADS features for differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from other non-HCC primary liver carcinomas (PLCs).
This IRB-approved, retrospective study was performed at two liver transplant centers. The final population included 375 patients with pathologically proven lesions imaged between 2007 and 2017 with contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. The cohort consisted of 165 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and 74 combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas, with the addition of 136 HCCs for control. Two abdominal radiologists (R1; R2) independently reviewed the imaging studies (112 CT; 263 MRI) and recorded the presence of targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images and features of tumor vascular involvement including encasement, narrowing, tethering, occlusion, and obliteration. The sensitivity and specificity of each feature were calculated for the diagnosis of non-HCC PLCs. Cohen's kappa (k) test was used to assess inter-reader agreement.
The sensitivity of targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images for the diagnosis of non-HCC PLCs was 27.5% and 32.6% (R1 and R2) and the specificity was 98.2% and 97.3% (R1 and R2). Among the features of tumor vascular involvement, those providing the highest sensitivity for non-HCC PLCs were vascular encasement (R1: 34.3%; R2: 37.2%) and obliteration (R1: 25.5%; R2: 29.7%). The highest specificity for non-HCC PLCs was provided by tethering (R1: 100%; R2: 97.1%) and occlusion (R1: 99.3%; R2: 99.3%). The inter-reader agreement was moderate to substantial (k = 0.48-0.77).
Targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images and features of tumor vascular involvement demonstrated high specificity for non-HCC malignancy.
• Targetoid appearance on T2-weighted imaging and signs of tumor vascular involvement have high specificity (92-100%) for the diagnosis of non-HCC PLCs, regardless of the presence of liver risk factors. • In the subset of patients with risk factors for HCC, the sensitivity of signs of tumor vascular involvement decreases for both readers (1.7-20.3%), while the specificity increases reaching values higher than 94.2%. • The inter-reader agreement is substantial for targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images (k = 0.74) and moderate to substantial for signs of tumor vascular involvement (k = 0.48-0.77).
评估 T2 加权成像上的靶征外观和肿瘤血管受累的征象作为 LI-RADS 的新特征,以区分肝细胞癌(HCC)与其他非 HCC 原发性肝癌(PLC)。
这项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性研究在两个肝移植中心进行。最终纳入了 375 例经病理证实的病变患者,这些患者在 2007 年至 2017 年间进行了增强 CT 或 MRI 检查。该队列包括 165 例肝内胆管细胞癌和 74 例混合型肝癌,并增加了 136 例 HCC 作为对照。两位腹部放射科医生(R1;R2)独立评估了影像学检查(112 例 CT;263 例 MRI),并记录了 T2 加权图像上的靶征外观以及肿瘤血管受累的特征,包括包绕、狭窄、束缚、闭塞和阻塞。计算了每个特征对非 HCC PLC 诊断的敏感性和特异性。采用 Cohen's kappa(k)检验评估读者间的一致性。
T2 加权图像上的靶征外观对非 HCC PLC 的诊断灵敏度为 27.5%和 32.6%(R1 和 R2),特异性为 98.2%和 97.3%(R1 和 R2)。在肿瘤血管受累的特征中,血管包绕(R1:34.3%;R2:37.2%)和阻塞(R1:25.5%;R2:29.7%)对非 HCC PLC 的诊断具有最高的敏感性。非 HCC PLC 提供最高特异性的特征是束缚(R1:100%;R2:97.1%)和闭塞(R1:99.3%;R2:99.3%)。读者间的一致性为中度至高度一致(k = 0.48-0.77)。
T2 加权图像上的靶征外观和肿瘤血管受累的特征对非 HCC 恶性肿瘤具有高特异性。
T2 加权成像上的靶征外观和肿瘤血管受累的征象对非 HCC 恶性肿瘤的诊断具有高特异性(92%-100%),无论是否存在肝脏风险因素。
在具有 HCC 风险因素的患者亚组中,两位读者的肿瘤血管受累征象的敏感性均降低(1.7%-20.3%),而特异性升高,达到高于 94.2%的值。
T2 加权图像上的靶征外观的读者间一致性为高度一致(k = 0.74),肿瘤血管受累征象的读者间一致性为中度至高度一致(k = 0.48-0.77)。